[A] Building Confidence: CHI 3, STL 1

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
Vying on 30 minutes of solid hockey, the Blackhawks were able to pull out a win that could arguably be the most important of the season.



Although the Blackhawks were victimized for a slow start once again, they snowballed into an avalanche of momentum while Corey Crawford held the fort for the first half of the game. Crawford's stellar performance is noted by his .967 save percentage, mimicking his performance of only 24 hours earlier, and certainly rolling with confidence as of late.



“I’m more in control. I thought I was starting to run out of position and ending up out of my net," said Crawford. "I[font=HelveticaNeue,]t was costing us a goal every game. That’s too much."[/font]



Corey's ability to tighten up his game allowed the Blackhawks to survive the 1st period, where they were out-shot 15-4. Unfortunately, NHL officials deemed that Andy McDonald was able to brush a kicked puck into the net with his stick, putting the Blues ahead late in the 1st period.



That goal would stand as the only goal the Blues would score. Mid-way through the 2nd period the scales would start to tip in the Blackhawks direction, although neither team was able to generate a goal in the middle frame.



By the time the 3rd period rolled around, the Blues couldn't handle the uphill battle, and the Blackhawks popped in 3 unanswered goals starting with Duncan Keith finding a hole in Brian Elliot, effectively ending his shutout streak. Later in the period, Dave Bolland's centering feed directed through Elliot to break the tie and force the Blues to opt for the extra attacker in the final minute of the game. Hossa made them pay by converting with an impressive empty net goal to put the Blues away in regulation.



Once again, the Blackhawks failed to convert on the power-play. Which streak will the Blackhawks break first? Scoring a power-play goal? Or getting a shutout?



CALL 'EM UP



Dylan Olsen and Jimmy Hayes both had impressive outings. Both clearly have no problem showing their physical presence and even seem to welcome it.



St. Louis is a blue collar team, they work hard, and they love to hit hard. Having two young players in our system that are willing to stand up and fight back is encouraging for our future sustained success in the Central Division and post-season action.



Olsen in particular has added some snarl to the back-end, a refreshing change of pace having another defenseman that can take a body and win battles in front of the net. Olsen really looks like he may be a perfect fit for Nick Leddy down the line. Both are polar opposites of each other and may be able to cover for each others weaknesses in a similar light that Keith and Seabrook fit as opposites.



BLACKHAWKS THREE STARS OF THE GAME



1. Corey Crawford

2. Duncan Keith

3. Dylan Olsen



Click here to view the article
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
waiting for the Crawford haters to not show up in this thread.
 

Chief Walking Stick

Heeeh heeeeh he said POLES
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
47,651
Liked Posts:
26,187
Reaves is a fucking pussy... refuses to fight Scott at the beginning of the game then tackles him from behind and punches him while he's down at the end of the game.
 

roshinaya

fnord
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,533
Liked Posts:
440
The Hawks pulled themselves out of their asses for the rest of the game after an abysmal first. Glad to see the bounces go the Hawks way for once and ice cold empty netter by Hoss the Boss. Keep on building on that momentum and string those wins together. Crawford also looks to have been improving and it will hopefully lead to him finding his solid game. The PP was still beyond awful, but it's to be expected and nothing worth getting in a huff about anymore.
 

JOVE23

New member
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
2,458
Liked Posts:
0
HOPEFULLY *knock on wood* the worst is behind us.
 

Mach29

New member
Joined:
Nov 27, 2011
Posts:
163
Liked Posts:
0
Watched the first two frames, second was better than a painful first BUT: Hey you get lucky. W'll take it anyway we can get it, This game and the next will decide where this season goes - too late to fall into another freefall so it's all falling into place. Confidence = WINS. I feel good!!
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
waiting for the Crawford haters to not show up in this thread.



I'll show. I'm not a fan of his. He has ways to go to get his save percentage respectable. Needs better rebound control, and I think he's not very good at goal scrambles.



I wasn't a fan of his last year. He needs to give his team a better chance to win games and do it more consistently. The Defence has taken a beating and the poor goaltending this whole season has gotten a pass,



A goaltender, IMO, needs to keep it around 2 GA a game to give his team a chance to win. Sometimes it will be 20 shots against, sometimes it needs to be 40.



He needs to win a playoff series too.



With that said, he played well today. Lets see if he can put another stretch together.
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
I'll show. I'm not a fan of his. He has ways to go to get his save percentage respectable. Needs better rebound control, and I think he's not very good at goal scrambles.



I wasn't a fan of his last year. He needs to give his team a better chance to win games and do it more consistently. The Defence has taken a beating and the poor goaltending this whole season has gotten a pass,



A goaltender, IMO, needs to keep it around 2 GA a game to give his team a chance to win. Sometimes it will be 20 shots against, sometimes it needs to be 40.



He needs to win a playoff series too.



With that said, he played well today. Lets see if he can put another stretch together.



it's not like he has never won a playoff series and has played 30 of them. He's played in one playoff series, and was a huge reason it went to game 7 overtime.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
Coming from the guy who coddles "23 year old" Patrick Kane, but Corey Crawford has to win a playoff series coming off a rookie season last year. Give the kid a break.
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
Coddles? Kane's produced his whole career.



Crawford had a solid year last season. I said it at that time too. If you think a .901 save percentage is good, I don't know what to tell you. But I'm sure, it's the goalie coaches fault.
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
23 year old Kane, by the way - Silver Medal, Stanley Cup, Rookie of the Year.



And 12th in the NHL in assists - in having a "down" year.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
I'll take .955 save percentage for the last 3 games, with the D injured, for 500 Alex.



Once again, Crawfords problems this season have been fixable, and it looks like he's figuring it out:



[font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]“I’m more in control. I thought I was starting to run out of position and ending up out of my net," said Crawford. "I[/font][font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]t was costing us a goal every game. That’s too much."[/font]



Not sure what a "better chance to win" looks like if you've watched the last 3 games he played.
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
I agree, last 3 games, he's been good. First 39 - not so good. I've never expected him to be a Vezina candidate, just average or consistent.



.900 - not so good.



If he can keep it where it was last year - .917....I'd be happy. All that would have been, would be about 20 more saves this year in the first 41gm. The team would've had a few more wins with 20 less GA.



Looks like his coach is improving his game.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
Holy shit are you being way too critical of a young goalie in his second full professional season. Are you a tiger mom too?
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
Look, Rex asked if his "haters" to come out. I'm not a fan of his - wasn't a fan last year. I don't bash the guy at every chance.



I said last year how he earned the job and played very well.



Sorry if I don't think he's been very good this season. I want him to do well. I want him to play better. The Hawks need better goaltending than they've gotten the first 60gms this year. I don't think that's a secret. Whether it's him, Emery, or whoever - I don't give a shit. But a .900 save percentage doesn't give your team a chance to win. I don't think or expect him to come in and win a Vezina, just be better than what he's been. I'd go on a limb and think he probably thinks the same of himself.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
I agree, last 3 games, he's been good. First 39 - not so good. I've never expected him to be a Vezina candidate, just average or consistent.



.900 - not so good.



If he can keep it where it was last year - .917....I'd be happy. All that would have been, would be about 20 more saves this year in the first 41gm. The team would've had a few more wins with 20 less GA.



Looks like his coach is improving his game.



I really don't care to bring up his stats this year, so you can look at the game log yourself. But I disagree that he was bad in the first 39 games he played, he has just been inconsistent this year, which is not uncommon among sophomore goaltenders.



His flaws have nothing to do with talent, so I hope him and Waite are figuring it out.



I agree a .900 save percentage is not good enough, but that really doesn't matter at this point, all that matters is how he performs during the final stretch of the season.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
835
Anyone else want to join the Dylan Olsen fan club? Man is he exactly what the Hawks lack on the back end. Big, physical, defensively responsible, and nasty to boot. Somebody on another forum said it, and I'll echo it. Olsen hates guys standing in front of the net. That's fucking awesome. Didn't give an inch against the Blues' hacks either. He and Hayes need to stay up, even if it means waiving one of the useless retirees.
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
I agree, last 3 games, he's been good. First 39 - not so good. I've never expected him to be a Vezina candidate, just average or consistent.



.900 - not so good.



If he can keep it where it was last year - .917....I'd be happy. All that would have been, would be about 20 more saves this year in the first 41gm. The team would've had a few more wins with 20 less GA.



Looks like his coach is improving his game.



lol at saying the first 39 games of his season has been garbage. Come on man, you know just like we all do that this was something that gradually happened.



Hell, he opened the season at 3-1-1 1.80GAA and .942 Save Percentage.



goaltending is all confidence, he is starting to get his game back.
 

Top