The older teams have an advantage, definitely. But to say that is all they need to be NBA Champions with a short schedule, that's a stretch.
It would be funny if the Spurs did win though. That would be two asterix championships for them.
I disagree teams like OKC and Chicago and Miami have the advantage they have young legs. Playing 66 games in such a short time will be bad on the older teams like the Spurs shit there will even be back to backs in the playoffs to get all the games in. And there will also be back to back to backs in the regular season. I think this season will benefit teams who have been together a while with chemistry but with a star like Durant or Rose or LBJ who is still young enough to handle so many games in such a short period.
here is the schedule info...
2011-12 NBA Schedule Breakdown
Regular Season Start Date: December 25, 2011
Regular Season End Date: April 26, 2012
Playoffs Start Date: April 28, 2012
Last Possible Finals Date: June 26, 2012
Individual Team Schedule Breakdown
Conference Games: 48
• Play 6 teams 4 times (2 home, 2 away)
• Play 4 teams 3 times (2 home, 1 away)
• Play 4 teams 3 times (1 home, 2 away)
Non-Conference Games: 18
• Play 3 teams 2 times (1 home, 1 away)
• Play 6 teams 1 time at home
• Play 6 teams 1 time away
Back to Back to Backs: All teams with at least 1; no more than 3
Playoff Back to Backs: Possible in second round
JMO