Bears new restrictions on the media covering practices

SERE Bear

Drinking da Bears better
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
6,636
Liked Posts:
6,758
From Jeremy Stotz at Bear Report-

The Bears no longer allow video or still shots taken beyond the first 10 minutes of practice. Gone are the days when we could film the rookies throughout practice to give the fans a better idea of their skill sets.

The Bears no longer allow media to report on the specifics of practice, including who is playing where and with what team (starters, backups, etc.).


I feel bad for JS as this was a strong point of his during the off season. His breakdowns and videos of players were phenomenal an I for one will miss that aspect of his coverage.


On the flip side I was always shocked at how just much the Bears allowed to be videoed and if I was in charge I would never have allowed videos to be taken at practice by reporters.
 

Mikeropod

Well-known member
Joined:
May 13, 2013
Posts:
856
Liked Posts:
642
Location:
South Bend, IN
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. San Antonio Spurs
  1. Chicago Bears
  2. Cleveland Browns
  1. San Jose Sharks
  1. Miami (Ohio) Redhawks
  2. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
I can see how that's a problem for his business model! Yeah, that stinks, I always enjoyed hearing perspectives on how the fresh teammates are doing.
 

BearsFan51

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 13, 2013
Posts:
9,247
Liked Posts:
4,738
I see absolutely no reason that practices should not be entirely open to the fans and the media. There's absolutely no secrets that can be gained by completely opening practice for all to see. Plus the amount of money it takes to attend a game it should be mandated that there as much free and open access as possible for the fans when it's not during the season. Every mini-camp practice should be open (there's only six mini-camp practices on average anyway barring a coaching change). And all of those practices plus OTAs should be open access.

The fans provide the revenue for everything they should be rewarded with as much free access as possible during times like this. The regular season, fine no access I understand but these team building activities should be open access FULLY.
 

Toast88

Well-known member
Joined:
May 10, 2014
Posts:
14,886
Liked Posts:
15,051
Kinda sucks, but I hate it when sports journalists whine about accessability
 

iueyedoc

Variant Also Negotiates
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
21,636
Liked Posts:
26,697
Location:
Mountains to Sea
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
I see absolutely no reason that practices should not be entirely open to the fans and the media. There's absolutely no secrets that can be gained by completely opening practice for all to see. Plus the amount of money it takes to attend a game it should be mandated that there as much free and open access as possible for the fans when it's not during the season. Every mini-camp practice should be open (there's only six mini-camp practices on average anyway barring a coaching change). And all of those practices plus OTAs should be open access.

The fans provide the revenue for everything they should be rewarded with as much free access as possible during times like this. The regular season, fine no access I understand but these team building activities should be open access FULLY.
**** yeah!! In fact I find it appalling that I am not allowed to spot Kyle Long when he bench presses and with all I do for the Bears, an after practice 40 yard dash double dare with Kevin White should not be allowed to be denied.

If you want dibs on handing out shower towels, I'm cool with that.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,410
Liked Posts:
36,748
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
The fans provide the revenue for everything they should be rewarded with as much free access as possible during times like this. The regular season, fine no access I understand but these team building activities should be open access FULLY.
You're right. What could possibly go wrong?

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on...after-texans-fan-harasses-matt-schaub-at-home

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-s...t-insults-to-wrong-chris-conte-220644754.html

[video=youtube;CqeLZ7vVLYE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqeLZ7vVLYE[/video]
 

iueyedoc

Variant Also Negotiates
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
21,636
Liked Posts:
26,697
Location:
Mountains to Sea
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
I see absolutely no reason that practices should not be entirely open to the fans and the media. There's absolutely no secrets that can be gained by completely opening practice for all to see. Plus the amount of money it takes to attend a game it should be mandated that there as much free and open access as possible for the fans when it's not during the season. Every mini-camp practice should be open (there's only six mini-camp practices on average anyway barring a coaching change). And all of those practices plus OTAs should be open access.

The fans provide the revenue for everything they should be rewarded with as much free access as possible during times like this. The regular season, fine no access I understand but these team building activities should be open access FULLY.
Sounds logical.

laughing-puppets-o.gif
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,410
Liked Posts:
36,748
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
I'm a teacher, so really tax payers are responsible for my salary. Given that, I don't see why ANY taxpayer shouldn't have full access to the schools they help fund.
 

Bearly

Guest
LOL they could close practice completely and not lose an a penny of revenue. Greed of bloggers and reporters at the detriment of the team.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,410
Liked Posts:
36,748
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
If ESPN were to boycott covering the NFL from Tuesday to Saturday the teams would never lose any money. Maybe it's time the media starts reflecting on how much coverage of the NFL is actually important?
 

Toast88

Well-known member
Joined:
May 10, 2014
Posts:
14,886
Liked Posts:
15,051
If ESPN were to boycott covering the NFL from Tuesday to Saturday the teams would never lose any money. Maybe it's time the media starts reflecting on how much coverage of the NFL is actually important?

Well, the answer is, as much as the consumer by and large wants.

I don't think the problem is that the media is covering too much football. It's the way in which they cover football that's problematic. I mean, these players and coaches are required to make themselves available to the media, and for their troubles, 90 percent of questions are some inane variation of, "So, how great did that touchdown feel?" or some such bullshit.

Sports journalists, for the most part, have lost any semblance of real insight or analysis, probably partly because the sports media machine is full of fans now instead of journalists. As a non-sports journalist, I fucking wish my subjects were required to talk to me. They're not. So I find other creative and meaningful ways to tell the news (records, secondary sources, etc.). I certainly don't stomp my feet and pout when a city councilman or mayor won't talk to me.

Part of me wishes sports leagues tomorrow would lift their requirements of players and coaches to talk to the media. That might filter out all the bullshitters who don't belong there and leave the real professionals who know what the **** they're doing.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,410
Liked Posts:
36,748
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
Well, the answer is, as much as the consumer by and large wants.

I don't think the problem is that the media is covering too much football. It's the way in which they cover football that's problematic. I mean, these players and coaches are required to make themselves available to the media, and for their troubles, 90 percent of questions are some inane variation of, "So, how great did that touchdown feel?" or some such bullshit.

Sports journalists, for the most part, have lost any semblance of real insight or analysis, probably partly because the sports media machine is full of fans now instead of journalists. As a non-sports journalist, I fucking wish my subjects were required to talk to me. They're not. So I find other creative and meaningful ways to tell the news (records, secondary sources, etc.)

Part of me wishes sports leagues tomorrow would lift their requirements of players and coaches to talk to the media. That might filter out all the bullshitters who don't belong there and leave the real professionals who know what the **** they're doing.
Great post.

This is why I love guys like Marshawn Lynch. IMO, guys like Lynch are great because they actually force sports journalists to actually do the work. It amazes me how much they'll ***** about what Lynch does to them, but not seek out a backup offensive lineman who actually might give them a real interview.
 

TheWinman

2020 CCS Survivor Fantasy Football Champion
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
7,071
Liked Posts:
3,226
Location:
Ann Arbor, MI
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Jim McMahon was never called "Hollywood"
 

Top