sth
New member
- Joined:
- May 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 2,851
- Liked Posts:
- 0
- Location:
- Billings, Montana
Nice try Billyboy but the Hawks overcame your shitty officiating!!! So let me on be half of Hawks nation invite you to kiss our collective asses!!!
Razzberry
New member
- Joined:
- May 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 125
- Liked Posts:
- 0
Re: Bill McCreary can eat an butt!
O'Rourke was the one making the terrible calls in the third.
O'Rourke was the one making the terrible calls in the third.
- Joined:
- May 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 47,886
- Liked Posts:
- 26,375
Re: Bill McCreary can eat an butt!
[quote name="sth"]Nice try Billyboy but the Hawks overcame your shitty officiating!!! So let me on be half of Hawks nation invite you to kiss our collective asses!!![/quote]
FIXED
[quote name="sth"]Nice try Billyboy but the Hawks overcame your shitty officiating!!! So let me on be half of Hawks nation invite you to kiss our collective asses!!![/quote]
FIXED
Maiden
New member
- Joined:
- May 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,148
- Liked Posts:
- 0
That icing call was ridiculous!!!!! I've seen 1000 clearings over the course of this season that were icings before tonight call was. BRUTAL
- Joined:
- May 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,802
- Liked Posts:
- 0
[quote name="Maiden"]That icing call was ridiculous!!!!! I've seen 1000 clearings over the course of this season that were icings before tonight call was. BRUTAL[/quote]
No shit.
Beyond that, I honestly do not understand how a team that was the 7th worst in the regular season and 3rd worst in the playoffs prior to this series, is suddenly angels...and conversely a team that was 4th best in the regular season and 6th best in the playoffs, is suddenly devils.
Seriously, I usually do not call out officiating, but this shit is too lopsided this series and it is not that obvious that it should be.
No shit.
Beyond that, I honestly do not understand how a team that was the 7th worst in the regular season and 3rd worst in the playoffs prior to this series, is suddenly angels...and conversely a team that was 4th best in the regular season and 6th best in the playoffs, is suddenly devils.
Seriously, I usually do not call out officiating, but this shit is too lopsided this series and it is not that obvious that it should be.
Razzberry
New member
- Joined:
- May 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 125
- Liked Posts:
- 0
They showed a replay of it between periods. Buff was on the wrong side of the red line when he tipped it, but I agree with you. Icing has always had a bit of a grey area on plays made right around the red line.
howcho
New member
- Joined:
- May 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 774
- Liked Posts:
- 40
- Location:
- Abbotsford, British Columbia
Hawks penalties where deserved for the most part save the first one to Bolland. The icing call was correct, Buff is a good 3ft away from the line. I thought SJ could have been called for one or two that where not, but overall, I do not think the refs where that poor.
Guest
Guest
Re: Bill McCreary can eat an butt!
[quote name="Razzberry"]O'Rourke was the one making the terrible calls in the third.[/quote]
Without a doubt. Although McCreary made up the interference on Bolland which was bullshit. Then called the "kicked in goal" good. Which it didn't look like he wanted to wait for Toronto to prove he made another poor call.
The Icing on the tying goal was in excusable. The Shark NOT ONLY TOUCHED THE PUCK, but could have played it.
NHL Officiating Blows. 2nd game in this series they've had to over come it. Appears the NHL wanted them to stick around a couple of more games.
[quote name="Razzberry"]O'Rourke was the one making the terrible calls in the third.[/quote]
Without a doubt. Although McCreary made up the interference on Bolland which was bullshit. Then called the "kicked in goal" good. Which it didn't look like he wanted to wait for Toronto to prove he made another poor call.
The Icing on the tying goal was in excusable. The Shark NOT ONLY TOUCHED THE PUCK, but could have played it.
NHL Officiating Blows. 2nd game in this series they've had to over come it. Appears the NHL wanted them to stick around a couple of more games.
Rdrhwke
New member
- Joined:
- May 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,428
- Liked Posts:
- 0
I don't think it matters as the Hawks are still up 3-0.
But the one-sidedness is annoying and hopefully will end once this series does.
We do not need a repeat of this crap in the Finals.
But the one-sidedness is annoying and hopefully will end once this series does.
We do not need a repeat of this crap in the Finals.
Guest
Guest
[quote name="howcho"]Hawks penalties where deserved for the most part save the first one to Bolland. The icing call was correct, Buff is a good 3ft away from the line. I thought SJ could have been called for one or two that where not, but overall, I do not think the refs where that poor.[/quote]
I guess the NHL just completely stopped calling "diving".
Weren't that poor? Sharks were the 8th penalized team during the regular season. They've been called for 4 penalties in 3 games.
Yea, right. Meanwhile the Hawks have been called for 16! Including a lengthy 5 on 3 which the first penalty of that 5 on 3 was complete horse shit.
And the Shark could have played the puck on the icing. It was not the right call.
I guess the NHL just completely stopped calling "diving".
Weren't that poor? Sharks were the 8th penalized team during the regular season. They've been called for 4 penalties in 3 games.
Yea, right. Meanwhile the Hawks have been called for 16! Including a lengthy 5 on 3 which the first penalty of that 5 on 3 was complete horse shit.
And the Shark could have played the puck on the icing. It was not the right call.
Guest
Guest
[quote name="Rdrhwke"]I don't think it matters as the Hawks are still up 3-0.
But the one-sidedness is annoying and hopefully will end once this series does.
We do not need a repeat of this crap in the Finals.[/quote]
Appears you guys had a child in the chat too. Sorry about that there most certainly should have been a moderator in the chat. No excuse from us.
But the one-sidedness is annoying and hopefully will end once this series does.
We do not need a repeat of this crap in the Finals.[/quote]
Appears you guys had a child in the chat too. Sorry about that there most certainly should have been a moderator in the chat. No excuse from us.
- Joined:
- May 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 47,886
- Liked Posts:
- 26,375
[quote name="R K"]
[quote name="Rdrhwke"]I don't think it matters as the Hawks are still up 3-0.
But the one-sidedness is annoying and hopefully will end once this series does.
We do not need a repeat of this crap in the Finals.[/quote]
Appears you guys had a child in the chat too. Sorry about that there most certainly should have been a moderator in the chat. No excuse from us.[/quote]
LOL! A "child" would even be underestimating it.
[quote name="Rdrhwke"]I don't think it matters as the Hawks are still up 3-0.
But the one-sidedness is annoying and hopefully will end once this series does.
We do not need a repeat of this crap in the Finals.[/quote]
Appears you guys had a child in the chat too. Sorry about that there most certainly should have been a moderator in the chat. No excuse from us.[/quote]
LOL! A "child" would even be underestimating it.
howcho
New member
- Joined:
- May 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 774
- Liked Posts:
- 40
- Location:
- Abbotsford, British Columbia
[quote name="R K"]
[quote name="howcho"]Hawks penalties where deserved for the most part save the first one to Bolland. The icing call was correct, Buff is a good 3ft away from the line. I thought SJ could have been called for one or two that where not, but overall, I do not think the refs where that poor.[/quote][/quote]
[quote name="R K"]I guess the NHL just completely stopped calling "diving".
Weren't that poor? Sharks were the 8th penalized team during the regular season. They've been called for 4 penalties in 3 games.
Yea, right. Meanwhile the Hawks have been called for 16! Including a lengthy 5 on 3 which the first penalty of that 5 on 3 was complete horse shit.
And the Shark could have played the puck on the icing. It was not the right call.[/quote]
You are clearly delusional my friend.
WTF do their records throughout the year have to do with these games? Hawks PP was shit in the last part of the season and now they are scoring, things change.
[quote name="howcho"]Hawks penalties where deserved for the most part save the first one to Bolland. The icing call was correct, Buff is a good 3ft away from the line. I thought SJ could have been called for one or two that where not, but overall, I do not think the refs where that poor.[/quote][/quote]
[quote name="R K"]I guess the NHL just completely stopped calling "diving".
Weren't that poor? Sharks were the 8th penalized team during the regular season. They've been called for 4 penalties in 3 games.
Yea, right. Meanwhile the Hawks have been called for 16! Including a lengthy 5 on 3 which the first penalty of that 5 on 3 was complete horse shit.
And the Shark could have played the puck on the icing. It was not the right call.[/quote]
You are clearly delusional my friend.
WTF do their records throughout the year have to do with these games? Hawks PP was shit in the last part of the season and now they are scoring, things change.
Guest
Guest
Then I stand delusional. The Shark could have clearly played the puck. Did they not show Q blowing an brain cell from the bench? He clearly disagrees with you as several people above do too. It was right in front of me no doubt they could have played the puck and this series has most certainly been called one sided.
12-6 on PP's. In two games of the three it's been 11-2??? Tell me the Hawks have taken that many more penalties and I'll show you a small piece of land slightly under water for sale. Lake front!
Better team is still winning. Again how many DIVES today? Three?
Regular season has a LOT to do with it. You telling me they just STOP taking penalties. Not buying that one either.
12-6 on PP's. In two games of the three it's been 11-2??? Tell me the Hawks have taken that many more penalties and I'll show you a small piece of land slightly under water for sale. Lake front!
Better team is still winning. Again how many DIVES today? Three?
Regular season has a LOT to do with it. You telling me they just STOP taking penalties. Not buying that one either.
sth
New member
- Joined:
- May 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 2,851
- Liked Posts:
- 0
- Location:
- Billings, Montana
Seriously if the Sharks dove anymore today they could be an Olympic diving team. I'm sorry half of the penalties were bogus. Especially the first two on Bolland. And the Hawks couldn't draw a penalty for anything. Games 1 and 3 were horrible ref wise it shows how much poise the Hawks have to overcome it.
sth
New member
- Joined:
- May 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 2,851
- Liked Posts:
- 0
- Location:
- Billings, Montana
Double post. I blame the NHL refs. :lol:
Rdrhwke
New member
- Joined:
- May 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,428
- Liked Posts:
- 0
[quote name="R K"]
Appears you guys had a child in the chat too. Sorry about that there most certainly should have been a moderator in the chat. No excuse from us.[/quote]
I guess the term "child" would be one way of putting it. He didn't much care for me....but I think he really liked Stu.
Appears you guys had a child in the chat too. Sorry about that there most certainly should have been a moderator in the chat. No excuse from us.[/quote]
I guess the term "child" would be one way of putting it. He didn't much care for me....but I think he really liked Stu.
whiteevo
New member
- Joined:
- May 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 673
- Liked Posts:
- 17
- Location:
- kalamazoo, mi
...i was hoping for some kind of make up call after that pussy hook hossa took for the 5 on 3...
...then i thought for sure we'd get something for "taking" three in a row in the third...
...then i was fucking floored about that icing call...
guess i'll be waiting for a call all the way into sunday now.
****'m, go hawks
...then i thought for sure we'd get something for "taking" three in a row in the third...
...then i was fucking floored about that icing call...
guess i'll be waiting for a call all the way into sunday now.
****'m, go hawks
supraman
New member
- Joined:
- May 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 8,024
- Liked Posts:
- 196
- Location:
- St.Pete, FL
I think Buff's tripping call in game 3 was a dive too. from the angle buff was at he would have a hard time actually tripping a player, yes he did touch the opponent's skates or shin pads but the player dove.
Rdrhwke
New member
- Joined:
- May 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,428
- Liked Posts:
- 0
[quote name="supraman"]I think Buff's tripping call in game 3 was a dive too. from the angle buff was at he would have a hard time actually tripping a player, yes he did touch the opponent's skates or shin pads but the player dove.[/quote]
I also thought Heatley took a dive on that call.
Oh well, doesn't matter anyways.
I also thought Heatley took a dive on that call.
Oh well, doesn't matter anyways.
Staff online NOW
-
bamainatlantaYou wake him up, you keep him up