- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 6,122
- Liked Posts:
- 1,642
- Location:
- Misery
I disagree about Bickell as the breakout player, I'd personally go with Frolik for that, but I like the read and love the part that at the end it says we'll be right up top in the conference all season long... not sure if that mean top 3, top 4, top whatever, but I like it...
Ya, Smith too... he should play a large role in the team's success...
Yeah. He'll probably be playing onthe second line. I don't expect him to become like Toews in a year, but he's going to be an important part of this team coming together.
Yeah. He'll probably be playing onthe second line. I don't expect him to become like Toews in a year, but he's going to be an important part of this team coming together.
I really don't see Smith ever being a top 6 player in the NHL. If he ever tops 45 points I will be very, very pleasantly surprised. He is a nice complete player for his age, but he doesn't have a very high ceiling. Crazier things have happened and he did put up nice numbers in college, but I just haven't really seen the offensive creativity or awareness around the net to be a top 6 player (in the NHL and AHL) . Trust me, I like what Smith brings to the table and I think he would be a great depth guy in this league as a top 9 guy (who could spot in the top 6 at times) but I just don't think he is a second line guy.
I dont think Smith is a lock for the roster right nowYeah. I disagree about Bickell, too. I think Frolik, Leddy, or Smith will be the breakout player.
Smith hasn't proven anything in the NHL; taking a look at prospects, and can't miss prospects in the not so distant history of the Hawks (or probably any team for that matter- I'm not entirely sure where all of the gushing is coming from- especially to the point of automatically giving that guy a slot based upon what? A handful of regular season games and one round of the playoffs?
No offense intended, but it strikes me as a little over the top. Strike that -- way over the top.
I'm not even sure with the depth chart as it currently stands that Mr Smith even makes the roster at the start of the season.
Both stalberg and smith are borderline on making the team IMO
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using Tapatalk
Both stalberg and smith are borderline on making the team IMO
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using Tapatalk
I can see Smith being borderline, but not Stalberg. If Stalberg isn't on the team I would be pretty surprised. Most of it has to do with the fact that Stalberg has a 1 way contract compared to Smith/Kruger having two-way contracts. Also, Stalberg is pretty serviceable and accepted his role nicely towards the end of last year - even if he isn't your prototypical bottom 6 guy. He does give you some versatility with his skill set. I still think Stalberg is the perfect #13 guy for this team, and that could be where he fits in.
I think Smith will make the team. That's just my opinion, though. As long as he has a good training camp, he has a spot on the roster.