vhans5219
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 28, 2009
- Posts:
- 250
- Liked Posts:
- 0
- Location:
- Chicago IL
That should've counted right ?
What do you guys think ?
What do you guys think ?
- Joined:
- Apr 11, 2009
- Posts:
- 23,599
- Liked Posts:
- 7,413
My favorite teams
They ruled it good on the floor, every single replay that they showed was hard to tell, should've counted. Atrocity of epic proportions...well maybe not epic but it was pretty darn bad.
TheStig
New member
- Joined:
- Apr 5, 2009
- Posts:
- 3,636
- Liked Posts:
- 38
No, he moved the ball too much, if he would have cought it in shooting postion it would have been good. I thought the nba established anyway that you couldn't do a catch and shoot with less than .6.
engies
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 29, 2009
- Posts:
- 355
- Liked Posts:
- 0
- Location:
- Oakleigh South, Melbourne, Australia
of course from the top it would look like his hands still on it, from below it looks like it got off in time. Bottom line it was hard to tell and they should've left the call as is
Then again if the situation was reversed and nuggets had hit the same shot miller did, would we be feeling the same way?
I think in the end either way one team wouldve felt they got screwed
Bottom line is we wouldnt have been in that position if everyone other than rose deng taj and noah had hit there shots. We got plenty of good looks, but again Kirk Trainwreck and Salmons are just not bringing it this season
Then again if the situation was reversed and nuggets had hit the same shot miller did, would we be feeling the same way?
I think in the end either way one team wouldve felt they got screwed
Bottom line is we wouldnt have been in that position if everyone other than rose deng taj and noah had hit there shots. We got plenty of good looks, but again Kirk Trainwreck and Salmons are just not bringing it this season
mlewinth
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 31, 2009
- Posts:
- 680
- Liked Posts:
- 6
TheStig wrote:
Thats what I thought too....
Thats what I thought too....
TheStig
New member
- Joined:
- Apr 5, 2009
- Posts:
- 3,636
- Liked Posts:
- 38
mlewinth wrote:
As soon as I saw it going away from the basket, I knew we lost. There just isn't the time to shoot it unless its thrown perfectly. It was a bad play, you really had to have had a second cut going to the basket with Noah after Rose's cut. Or cleared out everyone from the basket and just lobed it to rose.
As soon as I saw it going away from the basket, I knew we lost. There just isn't the time to shoot it unless its thrown perfectly. It was a bad play, you really had to have had a second cut going to the basket with Noah after Rose's cut. Or cleared out everyone from the basket and just lobed it to rose.
Dpauley23
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2009
- Posts:
- 1,496
- Liked Posts:
- 4
Im pretty sure thats if you set your feet
Shakes
Iconoclast
- Joined:
- Apr 22, 2009
- Posts:
- 3,857
- Liked Posts:
- 142
It's impossible to tell so they should have let it stand. With the naked eye it looked good, with normal speed replays it looked good, with slow-mo replays it looked good, with freeze frames from 50 different angles there was some doubt. To me I let that stand, and if the Nuggets had made the shot I'd say the same thing (and be really pissed we left someone that wide open).
Ultimately though we should have won the game before then. Salmons is starting to look like the second coming of Larry Hughes, and Kirk is living up to the Hinbrick nickname right now.
Ultimately though we should have won the game before then. Salmons is starting to look like the second coming of Larry Hughes, and Kirk is living up to the Hinbrick nickname right now.
- Joined:
- Apr 11, 2009
- Posts:
- 23,599
- Liked Posts:
- 7,413
My favorite teams
TheStig wrote:
I thought if it was less that .3 than it needed to be a tip. I could be wrong though.
Diddy1122
I ain't your pal dickface
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2009
- Posts:
- 4,459
- Liked Posts:
- 1,155
- Location:
- Chicago
TheStig wrote:
.4. The Fisher Rule.
I still say it was good. It was really too close to tell either way but if you cant conclusively say one way or the other, the call should have stood. So the call should've stood & we should be 5-2 right now.
.4. The Fisher Rule.
I still say it was good. It was really too close to tell either way but if you cant conclusively say one way or the other, the call should have stood. So the call should've stood & we should be 5-2 right now.
TheStig
New member
- Joined:
- Apr 5, 2009
- Posts:
- 3,636
- Liked Posts:
- 38
clonetrooper264 wrote:
Yeah, your right its .3. Which is weird because miller didn't even have a full catch and shoot and it was so close.
http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_history.html
90-91
Yeah, your right its .3. Which is weird because miller didn't even have a full catch and shoot and it was so close.
http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_history.html
90-91
engies
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 29, 2009
- Posts:
- 355
- Liked Posts:
- 0
- Location:
- Oakleigh South, Melbourne, Australia
Diddy1122 wrote:
Not sure if this has been asked but is there any chance the bulls can send in a tape to NBA to review the decision
Not sure if this has been asked but is there any chance the bulls can send in a tape to NBA to review the decision
houheffna
Ignoring Idiots
- Joined:
- May 6, 2009
- Posts:
- 8,673
- Liked Posts:
- 2,711
Not worth the time...It won't change the results regardless...
B1LLIONAIREKR3W
New member
- Joined:
- May 3, 2009
- Posts:
- 89
- Liked Posts:
- 1
- Location:
- Chicago,IL
Bullsman24
Mr Metta World Peace
- Joined:
- May 10, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,403
- Liked Posts:
- 51
i'll say it once, there was no CONCLUSIVE evidence that it was no good. it was way too close to tell. if that's not the refs loving melo and billups, idk what is...