Bulls pre-draft workout Schedule

Newskoolbulls

New member
Joined:
Mar 28, 2009
Posts:
2,897
Liked Posts:
9
Location:
Bullspodcasters>Any other bulls board
Cool thanks.

Mr. Thorton nice to see you on the list, and Janneros baby brother.
 

Dpauley23

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
1,496
Liked Posts:
4
I don't there brothers. The list doesn't make since because we don't have 2 round pick and Thornton the only who can be 1 rounder
 

Newskoolbulls

New member
Joined:
Mar 28, 2009
Posts:
2,897
Liked Posts:
9
Location:
Bullspodcasters>Any other bulls board
Dpauley23 wrote:
I don't there brothers. The list doesn't make since because we don't have 2 round pick and Thornton the only who can be 1 rounder

No your wrong they are brothers. Jeremy and Jannero.
 

Manic Devourer

New member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2009
Posts:
328
Liked Posts:
0
Dpauley23 wrote:
I don't there brothers. The list doesn't make since because we don't have 2 round pick and Thornton the only who can be 1 rounder

As they say in business, you've got to always cover your ass.

We could trade up in the draft, and may end up getting a second round pick in return. We could trade both our picks for an Amar'e or a Bosh, and end up buying a late first rounder or second round pick. I mean, anything can happen from now until the draft, so it's best to cover all bases and be prepared.
 

Diddy1122

I ain't your pal dickface
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
4,459
Liked Posts:
1,155
Location:
Chicago
Dpauley23 wrote:
I don't there brothers. The list doesn't make since because we don't have 2 round pick and Thornton the only who can be 1 rounder

Yes, Jeremy and Jannero are brothers, even though they look nothing alike, kinda like me and my brother. And the list makes sense because we are looking for role players in this draft. So checking out potential 2nd Rounders/Undrafteds is perfectly logical, especially if Pax is looking to trade out of the 1st round.

Plus it's pre-draft, so no one really knows where any of these players are gonna fall on the board.
 

Newskoolbulls

New member
Joined:
Mar 28, 2009
Posts:
2,897
Liked Posts:
9
Location:
Bullspodcasters>Any other bulls board
I would love JP on this team to take Robersons spot.
 

Dpauley23

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
1,496
Liked Posts:
4
I would tough to replace Robersons trash talking. We already have 5 pgs on this roster so we don't need another one
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,579
Liked Posts:
7,408
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Well I must say, Jeremy looks a lot better than his brother. I'd be fine replacing Roberson with him. I would like to see when the Bulls start working out players that they'll actually consider drafting with the 16 pick.
 

Newskoolbulls

New member
Joined:
Mar 28, 2009
Posts:
2,897
Liked Posts:
9
Location:
Bullspodcasters>Any other bulls board
Dpauley23 wrote:
I would tough to replace Robersons trash talking. We already have 5 pgs on this roster so we don't need another one

Jeremy is a scorer off the bench like his brother. Hes no pg, he does however have a pgs body.
 

Ralphb07

New member
Joined:
Mar 29, 2009
Posts:
490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Palm Bay FL
At 26 regardless where we go with 16 I want Marcus Thornton.... I think he could step in and help us from the get go as a role player
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,579
Liked Posts:
7,408
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Can someone please tell me why I still want Tyler Hansbrough? It's beginning to boggle my mind a bit.
 

Manic Devourer

New member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2009
Posts:
328
Liked Posts:
0
clonetrooper264 wrote:
Can someone please tell me why I still want Tyler Hansbrough? It's beginning to boggle my mind a bit.

Well I'm a fan of Tyler though many aren't, so I can emphasis with you.

If we end up drafting a guard with the 16th, I would gladly draft Tyler with the 26th. But I would definitely not want him for the 16th though. I think he could definitely be a rotation player for us right off the bat next year, as an energy player off the bench that bugs the opposing second unit players with his energy and relentlessness.

I'm just guessing that most people with a late pick, they prefer to draft a player who has a better chance of developing into something more than they are, but the truth is, so late in the draft you may as well go for a player that is proven and can contribute right away and Tyler can do that. He'll get you some points, and rebounds every single game and you won't ever have to question how hard he plays because you know he'll always bring it up 20 or down 20.
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,579
Liked Posts:
7,408
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Manic Devourer wrote:
clonetrooper264 wrote:
Can someone please tell me why I still want Tyler Hansbrough? It's beginning to boggle my mind a bit.

Well I'm a fan of Tyler though many aren't, so I can emphasis with you.

If we end up drafting a guard with the 16th, I would gladly draft Tyler with the 26th. But I would definitely not want him for the 16th though. I think he could definitely be a rotation player for us right off the bat next year, as an energy player off the bench that bugs the opposing second unit players with his energy and relentlessness.

I'm just guessing that most people with a late pick, they prefer to draft a player who has a better chance of developing into something more than they are, but the truth is, so late in the draft you may as well go for a player that is proven and can contribute right away and Tyler can do that. He'll get you some points, and rebounds every single game and you won't ever have to question how hard he plays because you know he'll always bring it up 20 or down 20.
Yeah it must be a hustle thing. It's a quality I've grown to like from watching the Skiles era. The guy will play his heart out no matter what which must be like heaven for a coach. Hansbrough at the 26 would make me very happy. Besides, how much talent are you really expecting from the 26 anyway?
 

Rose1

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
360
Liked Posts:
0
JP will better than all of them guys. I saw Thronton play in Community College, and he's nothing special. He reminds me of a smaller Jason Terry. What the hell do I want him on the Bulls for when we have Ben Gordon! He's another SG that's a tweener and can't really defend.
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,579
Liked Posts:
7,408
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
I don't see the Bulls taking any of those players to be honest
 

Rose1

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
360
Liked Posts:
0
you right. If Daye is there, Bulls will grab him instead.
 

Ralphb07

New member
Joined:
Mar 29, 2009
Posts:
490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Palm Bay FL
Rose1 wrote:
JP will better than all of them guys. I saw Thronton play in Community College, and he's nothing special. He reminds me of a smaller Jason Terry. What the hell do I want him on the Bulls for when we have Ben Gordon! He's another SG that's a tweener and can't really defend.

I had no idea you have inside information and that Gordon is back..........
 

Top