I actually still believe in Wentz. I think he still can be a good QB. I don't think I've ever seen a team lose WRs and OL like they have the last 2 years. And while the OL wouldn't be much better in Chicago, the WRs would be if the Bears keep Robinson.
Wentz's contract is horrible for the Eagles, but isn't too bad for the team trading for him. With the Eagles taking all the signing bonus money, the acquiring team gets Wentz for 4 years/98.4Mil. That's 24M per year, which is below average for a QB (19th most AAV). But he has an out in his deal after 2 years, which basically makes it a 2-year/47.4M deal, that has 0 dead cap after 2022.
That being said, to trade a draft pick (probably would take a 3rd and 5th IMO) and pay Wentz as the 19th highest paid QB, you'd basically have to be pretty sure he's a top 10 QB for it to be a net gain. There's plenty of doubt he can be that again. And considering Wentz has been WAY worse than Trubisky and even Foles this year, the Bears can gamble on QB improvement much cheaper with Mitch (or basically free with Foles).
It just doesn't make sense for the Bears to trade for a QB at all. But it definitely doesn't make sense to trade for a QB that you aren't 100% sure can be the answer.
I haven't followed the eagles exploits this season but there seems to be obvious reasons why the terrible year.
Its also very hard for me to believe that he just fell off the face of the earth after his prior 3 years worth of good play.
During his 2nd - 4th years (2017 - 2019), CW compiled a 81-21 td/int ratio of 4-1 which is pretty impressive.
He also ranked 4th, 7th and 13th in passer rating during those years.
The defense is 9th in points allowed and 7th in DVOA this year and still has a few more good years left.
The question remains, who would be the best QB to lead the offense during this time period?
Assuming Arob is tagged and they can afford everything, do they....
-trade a 3rd and 5th for CW and put him back into a much better situation
-sign/tag Mitch
-roll the dice with a rookie QB?