- Joined:
- Nov 29, 2014
- Posts:
- 13,374
- Liked Posts:
- 15,883
- Location:
- Texas
Who?Stop finding ways to defend the guy, he
Stop finding ways to defend the guy, he sucks, it’s clearly obvious. You have to be blind not to see it
Who?Stop finding ways to defend the guy, he
Stop finding ways to defend the guy, he sucks, it’s clearly obvious. You have to be blind not to see it
No one can run what Nagy is doing? Nagy can’t run what Nagy wants to do
sorry but false he doesn't put his team in a good position to win. He needs so much to go his way for a win its not sustainable as his record against decent + teams shows. I've watched him and others some will be ok some won't. He will be a chase Daniel level guy and get paid til he wants to leave NFL.No separation by the receivers. Its not as if Mitch was missing wide open guys. There wasn't much there. On top of that, Defense wasn't getting off the field and unable to produce good field position.
It wasn't a good game by Mitch, but he isn't an all star. He played well enough to put his team in a position to win. Playcalling and defense were more to blame.
Those talking about tagging Mitch though are joking or just following the media trying to sell a headline. Mitch is going to hit FA and very unlikely to get more than 10-12 mil a year.
I actually can't stop laughing at this guy. Imagine having this feeble of a mind.
There will be better options than mitch available in FA.I still expect mitch to be back.
Not because he's good, but because we have no better option. Unless, like I mentioned earlier, the dolphins decide to move on from tua and draft wilson/fields and we can trade for him.
Anyone who doesn't see the progression and are screaming about a single bad throw must really not understand the game of football.
Once we couldn't stop Rodgers, the game plan turned predictable like another poster mentioned. The Packers have a way of forcing an opposing offenses hand to have to out Rodgers, Rodgers. It doesn't work very often. Just look at what they did to Tannehill) last week: 11 of 24 for 121 yards 1TD and 2 INT. This was a guy who many have indicated would be the perfect qb in the bears offense and have even referred to as MT's "ceiling." He really played more like Kyle Orton in that game.
We're getting closer and closer to being competitive against Green Bay. This game was competitive most of the way and yes Mitch had a single bad throw (Rodgers probably should have also been picked a couple times and probably would have been if Roquan Smith didn't take an early exit). Rodgers did play near perfect football and we were down Jaylon Johnson and Roquan Smith and still managed to make this game competitive the majority of the way.
Save for the 1 pick, Mitch was efficient and is gaining confidence. His deep ball needs work but he wouldn't be the first quarterback in NFL history to struggle with the deep ball early in his career. This last month hasn't been a fluke and suddenly even the offensive line is playing acceptable football.
Why blow all of that up when they're trending in the right direction? Why create a need at QB when we have one that we already win with. Instead they should keep the core of guys they have; Mitch, A-Rob, Mooney, Montgomery, Cohen, etc. Build off of that and let the offense continue to ascend.
Couple that with what will almost certainly be an improved defense by Eddie Goldman clogging up the interior after a year of rest and perhaps now the flexibility to add yet another defensive play maker without the need for a QB and less of a need for offensive lineman. Maybe this will be the answer to the Bears beating the Packers with another blue chip player on the defense and an offense that's coming into its own.
They should absolutely give it another shot and anyone who doesn't see that is completely idiotic. If Foles was not pulled, this is easily a 10-6 team. Mitch responded to his benching by coming back with the first back to back to back to back 30 point games for the first time since 1965.
Did you PM him?
Such is the life of a Bears fan. The best play we can point to by our QB was a missed TD. And, yes, we settled for a FG.One pass thats a TD if he throws it farther?
Yeah, not impressed
I believe if Mahomes was here, he would be bad alsoThat could very well be the truth. But we know the answer is not Trubisky or Foles, so...
I still expect mitch to be back.
Not because he's good, but because we have no better option. Unless, like I mentioned earlier, the dolphins decide to move on from tua and draft wilson/fields and we can trade for him.
I believe if Mahomes was here, he would be bad also
Not just that. One of those was a 4th down throw so who cares? It only gets you better field position if intercepted. I was more disappointed he bothered and didn't just tuck it when the play was obviously not run like it was supposed to be.If your logic is about almost INT'S, Rodgers should have had 3 picks
This. He wouldn't be as good but Mahomes>>>>Mith under any circumstances.His talent...even we couldn’t fuck that up.
To be fair, Tua has looked every bit like a Chicago Bears QB this season.
Mitch has got to go. Rodgers is 21 - 5 in his career against the Bears. That's a .807 winning percentage. Can Mitch beat Rodgers and Green Bay? No. If you can't consistently beat the top team in your division then you're at best a wild card team playing on the road and that road leads to nowhere.
He was a problem.157 passer rating for Rodgers but you want to talk about how Mitch was the problem lol