CBE 93: How many wins will the Bulls finish with?

Fred

New member
Joined:
Mar 29, 2009
Posts:
982
Liked Posts:
7
I'll stick with my preseason prediction of 39. Mark says more than 41. What do you say?

I also argue that anything less than 41 will be a MASSIVE disappointment considering:
a. Rose is now an All-Star. He's better this year than he was last year.
b. Noah is much better than last year.
c. Taj jas added some needed interior defense.
d. Greater Defensive Focus.

The team was basically the same as the one that finished last year at 17-10....we just swapped out Gordon for Deng.

Derrick Rose, Brad Miller, Taj Gibson Played in every game.
Luol Deng 61,
Joakim Noah 50
Kirk Hinrich 55
 

Shakes

Iconoclast
Joined:
Apr 22, 2009
Posts:
3,857
Liked Posts:
142
Well up until Noah went out we were on a 21-10 run. That was with Hinrich, Miller and Salmons playing much worse than during that 17-10 run. After the Portland game (and before the news that Noah was gone for 3 weeks) I was confident of finishing with 45+ wins.

I really think we would have won 50+ games this year if:
a) Rose started the year healthy
b) Noah stayed healthy
c) To a lesser extent, if Hinrich/Miller/Salmons at least managed the level of suck they reached the last couple of months, rather than the doesn't even belong in the NBA level of suck they started the year with.

So now we're looking at around 40 wins. It'll be a disappointment, but what are you going to do? Injuries happen. The 21-10 run shows the level the core of Rose/Deng/Noah can reach when healthy, even when surrounded by not very good team mates. Get them some help and this team can be really good. Get them one of the big three and they can be contenders.
 

dougthonus

New member
Joined:
Mar 13, 2009
Posts:
2,665
Liked Posts:
9
Fred wrote:
I'll stick with my preseason prediction of 39. Mark says more than 41. What do you say?

I also argue that anything less than 41 will be a MASSIVE disappointment considering:
a. Rose is now an All-Star. He's better this year than he was last year.
b. Noah is much better than last year.
c. Taj jas added some needed interior defense.
d. Greater Defensive Focus.

The team was basically the same as the one that finished last year at 17-10....we just swapped out Gordon for Deng.

Derrick Rose, Brad Miller, Taj Gibson Played in every game.
Luol Deng 61,
Joakim Noah 50
Kirk Hinrich 55

For someone who says he doesn't want to talk about Gordon unless baited into it, you sure seem to bring up Gordon a lot.

The team also swapped out Tyrus for Hakim Warrick, John Salmons for Flip Murray (both downgrades) and is missing the guy you consider the biggest difference maker. I would say without the injuries and without the trades the Bulls would have finished with 45+ wins easily.

With the trades and injuries, who knows, even 39 wins seems optimistic right now.
 

cool007

New member
Joined:
Mar 29, 2009
Posts:
688
Liked Posts:
2
Location:
Mundelein
I predicted 42 wins and I said they might still win 44 games.

Well, they were on pace to win 44 games atleast until Noah was shut down last month.

Now, I think we will win around 38-40 games.

But when I look at the remainder schedule. I think I am going crazy.

Here's Cool's predictions:


March
Thu 11 @ Orlando 7:00pm L
Fri 12 @ Miami 6:30pm L
Tue 16 @ Memphis 7:00pm L
Wed 17 @ Dallas 7:30pm L
Fri 19 vs Cleveland 7:00pm L
Sat 20 @ Philadelphia 6:00pm W
Mon 22 vs Houston 7:00pm W (Noah is BACK BABY)
Thu 25 vs Miami 7:00pm W
Sat 27 vs New Jersey 7:00pm W
Sun 28 @ Detroit 5:00pm W
Tue 30 vs Phoenix 7:00pm W

April
Fri 02 @ Washington 6:00pm W
Sat 03 vs Charlotte 7:00pm W
Tue 06 vs Milwaukee 7:00pm W
Thu 08 vs Cleveland 7:00pm L
Fri 09 @ New Jersey 7:00pm W
Sun 11 @ Toronto 5:00pm L
Tue 13 vs Boston 7:00pm W
Wed 14 @ Charlotte 7:00pm L


Please tell me I am crazy. Why do I see a 9-game Winning streak after 10 game Losing streak????

I see it as 11-8 for this stretch.

42-40 overall record at the end.
 

RPK

New member
Joined:
Mar 29, 2009
Posts:
287
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
[No message]
 

postdiction

New member
Joined:
Jun 16, 2009
Posts:
118
Liked Posts:
0
Fred wrote:
I'll stick with my preseason prediction of 39. Mark says more than 41. What do you say?

I also argue that anything less than 41 will be a MASSIVE disappointment considering:
a. Rose is now an All-Star. He's better this year than he was last year.
b. Noah is much better than last year.
c. Taj jas added some needed interior defense.
d. Greater Defensive Focus.

The team was basically the same as the one that finished last year at 17-10....we just swapped out Gordon for Deng.

Derrick Rose, Brad Miller, Taj Gibson Played in every game.
Luol Deng 61,
Joakim Noah 50
Kirk Hinrich 55

It would only be a "MASSIVE disappointment" if everybody was healthy. Noah hasn't been healthy since before the all star break. Now Deng is also having injury issues (calf strain)/ and has been sick. So considering injuries no getting to 41 wins without Noah and without a healthy Deng is not a "MASSIVE disappointment".
 

postdiction

New member
Joined:
Jun 16, 2009
Posts:
118
Liked Posts:
0
dougthonus wrote:
For someone who says he doesn't want to talk about Gordon unless baited into it, you sure seem to bring up Gordon a lot.

The team also swapped out Tyrus for Hakim Warrick, John Salmons for Flip Murray(both downgrades) and is missing the guy you consider the biggest difference maker. I would say without the injuries and without the trades the Bulls would have finished with 45+ wins easily.

With the trades and injuries, who knows, even 39 wins seems optimistic right now.

+1



The current Bulls have very little talent besides Rose that isn't injured/sick.
 

Fred

New member
Joined:
Mar 29, 2009
Posts:
982
Liked Posts:
7
postdiction wrote:
Fred wrote:
I'll stick with my preseason prediction of 39. Mark says more than 41. What do you say?

I also argue that anything less than 41 will be a MASSIVE disappointment considering:
a. Rose is now an All-Star. He's better this year than he was last year.
b. Noah is much better than last year.
c. Taj jas added some needed interior defense.
d. Greater Defensive Focus.

The team was basically the same as the one that finished last year at 17-10....we just swapped out Gordon for Deng.

Derrick Rose, Brad Miller, Taj Gibson Played in every game.
Luol Deng 61,
Joakim Noah 50
Kirk Hinrich 55

It would only be a "MASSIVE disappointment" if everybody was healthy. Noah hasn't been healthy since before the all star break. Now Deng is also having injury issues (calf strain)/ and has been sick. So considering injuries no getting to 41 wins without Noah and without a healthy Deng is not a "MASSIVE disappointment".

Does anyone recall our record before Noah missed his first game due to injury?
 

Fred

New member
Joined:
Mar 29, 2009
Posts:
982
Liked Posts:
7
dougthonus wrote:
Fred wrote:
I'll stick with my preseason prediction of 39. Mark says more than 41. What do you say?

I also argue that anything less than 41 will be a MASSIVE disappointment considering:
a. Rose is now an All-Star. He's better this year than he was last year.
b. Noah is much better than last year.
c. Taj jas added some needed interior defense.
d. Greater Defensive Focus.

The team was basically the same as the one that finished last year at 17-10....we just swapped out Gordon for Deng.

Derrick Rose, Brad Miller, Taj Gibson Played in every game.
Luol Deng 61,
Joakim Noah 50
Kirk Hinrich 55

For someone who says he doesn't want to talk about Gordon unless baited into it, you sure seem to bring up Gordon a lot.

The team also swapped out Tyrus for Hakim Warrick, John Salmons for Flip Murray (both downgrades) and is missing the guy you consider the biggest difference maker. I would say without the injuries and without the trades the Bulls would have finished with 45+ wins easily.

With the trades and injuries, who knows, even 39 wins seems optimistic right now.

Tyrus for Hakim was a downgrade? Their numbers for the Bulls are remarkably similar, although Hakim has a slightly higher PPG average and Tyrus has more blocks. Tyrus did also provide a crappy attitude, incredibly poor defensive rebounding fundamentals, incredibly poor shot selection, and the occasional petulant outburst. Of course Tyrus is 100 times more talented, but as far as what each has brought to the table for our team, I honestly don't consider it a downgrade.
 

Fred

New member
Joined:
Mar 29, 2009
Posts:
982
Liked Posts:
7
Shakes wrote:
Well up until Noah went out we were on a 21-10 run. That was with Hinrich, Miller and Salmons playing much worse than during that 17-10 run. After the Portland game (and before the news that Noah was gone for 3 weeks) I was confident of finishing with 45+ wins.

I really think we would have won 50+ games this year if:
a) Rose started the year healthy
b) Noah stayed healthy
c) To a lesser extent, if Hinrich/Miller/Salmons at least managed the level of suck they reached the last couple of months, rather than the doesn't even belong in the NBA level of suck they started the year with.

So now we're looking at around 40 wins. It'll be a disappointment, but what are you going to do? Injuries happen. The 21-10 run shows the level the core of Rose/Deng/Noah can reach when healthy, even when surrounded by not very good team mates. Get them some help and this team can be really good. Get them one of the big three and they can be contenders.

Noah went out on February 5th and missed 7 games. At what point before that did we go 21-10? Could you please point out that stretch?

Actually, we went 8-6 in Feb with Noah missing or hobbled for most of the month. You shouldn't go from that to 0-10 (what I predict they'll be after they lose the next 5) just because the schedule gets more difficult, ESPECIALLY with the way Rose is playing. You have to beat Indiana at Indiana, and you have to beat Memphis at home, with or without Noah. And you would like to beat Dallas with a roster of 8 guys (minues Haywood, Dampier, and Jason Terry), and you would have if Deng wasn't outscored 24-6 by Butler.

This injury excuse is ridiculous. We're not making the playoffs because of our pathetic start, despite Noah's superb play from Game 1.
 

postdiction

New member
Joined:
Jun 16, 2009
Posts:
118
Liked Posts:
0
Fred wrote:
Shakes wrote:
Well up until Noah went out we were on a 21-10 run. That was with Hinrich, Miller and Salmons playing much worse than during that 17-10 run. After the Portland game (and before the news that Noah was gone for 3 weeks) I was confident of finishing with 45+ wins.

I really think we would have won 50+ games this year if:
a) Rose started the year healthy
b) Noah stayed healthy
c) To a lesser extent, if Hinrich/Miller/Salmons at least managed the level of suck they reached the last couple of months, rather than the doesn't even belong in the NBA level of suck they started the year with.

So now we're looking at around 40 wins. It'll be a disappointment, but what are you going to do? Injuries happen. The 21-10 run shows the level the core of Rose/Deng/Noah can reach when healthy, even when surrounded by not very good team mates. Get them some help and this team can be really good. Get them one of the big three and they can be contenders.

Noah went out on February 5th and missed 7 games. At what point before that did we go 21-10? Could you please point out that stretch?

Actually, we went 8-6 in Feb with Noah missing or hobbled for most of the month. You shouldn't go from that to 0-10 (what I predict they'll be after they lose the next 5) just because the schedule gets more difficult, ESPECIALLY with the way Rose is playing. You have to beat Indiana at Indiana, and you have to beat Memphis at home, with or without Noah. And you would like to beat Dallas with a roster of 8 guys (minues Haywood, Dampier, and Jason Terry), and you would have if Deng wasn't outscored 24-6 by Butler.

This injury excuse is ridiculous. We're not making the playoffs because of our pathetic start, despite Noah's superb play from Game 1.

How come you use the injury excuse to rationalize why BG is sucking and why Detroit has a horrible record?

Also, why do you keep ignoring the fact that Deng has been playing poorly or missed an entire game due to injury/sickness. If I remember correctly he had a knee problem for a couple of games, then was sick with a stomach flu and now has calf problem.

Noah and Deng are 2 of our top 3 players, missing them is a huge blow to the Bulls. Before Noah went out I believe we were trending upwards and had the 3rd or 4th best record in the east since mid December(when Rose finally got healthy).

Granted there are teams (Lakers, Magic, Cavs ect....) that can miss some of their top players and still be good due to excellent depth but, they also have huge payrolls and aren't trying to cut money to get under the cap.

The Bulls are in a difficult position. They have to cut enough money/talent to get max cap space and still have enough talent to make the playoffs. Something is going to suffer and that is depth. So yes the Bulls aren't very deep but even then a healthy Bulls team would make playoffs.
 

Fred

New member
Joined:
Mar 29, 2009
Posts:
982
Liked Posts:
7
postdiction wrote:
Fred wrote:
Shakes wrote:
Well up until Noah went out we were on a 21-10 run. That was with Hinrich, Miller and Salmons playing much worse than during that 17-10 run. After the Portland game (and before the news that Noah was gone for 3 weeks) I was confident of finishing with 45+ wins.

I really think we would have won 50+ games this year if:
a) Rose started the year healthy
b) Noah stayed healthy
c) To a lesser extent, if Hinrich/Miller/Salmons at least managed the level of suck they reached the last couple of months, rather than the doesn't even belong in the NBA level of suck they started the year with.

So now we're looking at around 40 wins. It'll be a disappointment, but what are you going to do? Injuries happen. The 21-10 run shows the level the core of Rose/Deng/Noah can reach when healthy, even when surrounded by not very good team mates. Get them some help and this team can be really good. Get them one of the big three and they can be contenders.

Noah went out on February 5th and missed 7 games. At what point before that did we go 21-10? Could you please point out that stretch?

Actually, we went 8-6 in Feb with Noah missing or hobbled for most of the month. You shouldn't go from that to 0-10 (what I predict they'll be after they lose the next 5) just because the schedule gets more difficult, ESPECIALLY with the way Rose is playing. You have to beat Indiana at Indiana, and you have to beat Memphis at home, with or without Noah. And you would like to beat Dallas with a roster of 8 guys (minues Haywood, Dampier, and Jason Terry), and you would have if Deng wasn't outscored 24-6 by Butler.

This injury excuse is ridiculous. We're not making the playoffs because of our pathetic start, despite Noah's superb play from Game 1.

How come you use the injury excuse to rationalize why BG is sucking and why Detroit has a horrible record?

Also, why do you keep ignoring the fact that Deng has been playing poorly or missed an entire game due to injury/sickness. If I remember correctly he had a knee problem for a couple of games, then was sick with a stomach flu and now has calf problem.

Noah and Deng are 2 of our top 3 players, missing them is a huge blow to the Bulls. Before Noah went out I believe we were trending upwards and had the 3rd or 4th best record in the east since mid December(when Rose finally got healthy).

Granted there are teams (Lakers, Magic, Cavs ect....) that can miss some of their top players and still be good due to excellent depth but, they also have huge payrolls and aren't trying to cut money to get under the cap.

The Bulls are in a difficult position. They have to cut enough money/talent to get max cap space and still have enough talent to make the playoffs. Something is going to suffer and that is depth. So yes the Bulls aren't very deep but even then a healthy Bulls team would make playoffs.

#1. Deng has played in 62 of 63 games so far. He was healthy enough to score 24 points 5 days ago. Have injuries really hobbled Luol Deng so far this season, any more so than the average NBA player? Have Deng's injuries hurt the Bulls more than, let's say, Dwayne Wade's injuries have hurt the Heat? Wade has actually missed 4 entire games. True, if Deng's hurt going forward, the playoffs will be a very long shot for us. But AT THIS POINT of the season, our top 2 offensive players have played in 124 out of 125 games...How many teams can say that? Certainly not Milwaukee, Detroit, Miami, Houston, Boston, Portland, the Lakers, the Clippers, the Pacers, San Antonio...and that's just off the top of my head. And yet, we're the #9 seed.

#2. I listen to the Skiles' postgame interviews on Youtube quite a bit. The Bucks post them there. Even before Salmons saved their season, I never heard him use injuries as an excuse. They played pretty well before John showed up, even though they are half as talented as we are. Which team has been hurt more by injuries? Noah has played in 50 games. Michael Redd has played in 18. AS A WHOLE, which injury has hurt their respective teams more?

#3. "How come you use the injury excuse to rationalize why BG is sucking and why Detroit has a horrible record?" How are my critical comments about the TEAM and the Bulls' fans/coach/announcers using the injury excuse relevant to pointing out the detrimental effect an injury has had on BG's performance? I fail to see the connection. I could point out that Yao Ming hasn't helped out the Rockets this year, and then talk about a team with a legitimate injury beef (Portland), but why would that even be relevant.

But since you brought it up, BG is averaging 13.7 PPG in 28 minutes. I'm praying for a shooting guard to approach those numbers. I'll let his coach take it from here:
"It isn't a fair year to look at numbers for him because he has been hurt so much. That's one of the things I look at right now. I just don't think it's a fair question because it's not reflective of what type of player he is. You've got a guy who's a quality person, a quality professional, and all he does is work. He wants to do well. Sometimes, the mind might be right, but the body is saying, 'Hey, you can't do but so much.' That's what's occurred a lot. He started off the season really playing extremely well, and then he had the injuries." – John Kuester. I'm sure someone in the Bulls organization said the same thing about Luol last year.
 

Shakes

Iconoclast
Joined:
Apr 22, 2009
Posts:
3,857
Liked Posts:
142
Fred wrote:
Noah went out on February 5th and missed 7 games. At what point before that did we go 21-10? Could you please point out that stretch?

So we beat the Knicks (twice), the Pacers, the Wolves and the Sixers without Noah. The best record of those teams is 23-40. If you expect that to carry over into us being able to cope without Noah against anyone decent you're fooling yourself.

Actually, we went 8-6 in Feb with Noah missing or hobbled for most of the month. You shouldn't go from that to 0-10 (what I predict they'll be after they lose the next 5) just because the schedule gets more difficult, ESPECIALLY with the way Rose is playing. You have to beat Indiana at Indiana, and you have to beat Memphis at home, with or without Noah. And you would like to beat Dallas with a roster of 8 guys (minues Haywood, Dampier, and Jason Terry), and you would have if Deng wasn't outscored 24-6 by Butler.

This injury excuse is ridiculous. We're not making the playoffs because of our pathetic start, despite Noah's superb play from Game 1.

Before Noah went out we were the 6th ranked defense in the league. We're already down to the 11th ranked and plummeting like a rock. The offense has been fine, we've been an average to slightly above average offense since Christmas and have if anything been even better recently. But the defense has gone from one of the best to one of the worst in the league.

Either players have forgotten how to play defense all of a sudden or it's the players that are there (or more to the point no longer there). You can't say injuries are no excuse. If Jordan went down during the dynasty and the Bulls started losing would you say "injuries are no excuse, Jud Buechler should be able to fill in"? Because that's as ridiculous as expecting to swap Noah for Richards and have the defense to hold up against good teams.
 

pinkizdead

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
3,692
Liked Posts:
131
Location:
south loop
Re:CBE 93: How many wins will the Bulls finish wit

Fred wrote:
I'll stick with my preseason prediction of 39. Mark says more than 41. What do you say?

I also argue that anything less than 41 will be a MASSIVE disappointment considering:
a. Rose is now an All-Star. He's better this year than he was last year.
b. Noah is much better than last year.
c. Taj jas added some needed interior defense.
d. Greater Defensive Focus.

The team was basically the same as the one that finished last year at 17-10....we just swapped out Gordon for Deng.

Derrick Rose, Brad Miller, Taj Gibson Played in every game.
Luol Deng 61,
Joakim Noah 50
Kirk Hinrich 55

no. i expected to suck. in fact i thought we would be significantly worse if we hit the tiniest bit of injuries. we really only have 7 nba players on our rosters.

the start of the year, we had injuries and poor chemistry - salmons playing out of position, and little to no scoring from our big minute players.

we HAD a greater defensive focus, but we were playing far too many players who were limited on the offensive end. Basically at the start of the year we had hinrich, Tyrus, and noah playing major minutes. Rose salmons and deng(whose isn't capable of generating his own shot) are good offensive players, it's hard for them to pick up the scoring for the entire team. Also besides taj gibson, the major starters got little to nothing from the bench. Miller was playing terribly back then. pargo is still playing terribly.

Moreover rose's injury and salmon's child created a situation in which the other bulls needed to step up their scoring load. this simply didnt happen. Vinnie isn't a great x's and o's coach, so we didnt have the same luck/production that milwaukee is getting from their role players.

second half of the season
rose is phenomenal. deng is playing well. hinrich still sucks, but he's managed to suck favorably. (i acknowledge that i dont dislike hinrich, i dislike his role on this team and his contract. if hinrich was on a 5 million dollar a year contract, and a 6th man, i'd love him. ) Sadly noah and taj are injured. miller has risen from the grave ( didn't he do this last year? crappy first half o the season, and a great second half? maybe during the begining of the year, it's hard to be in playing conditioning at 34) we've down graded our defensively orientated players for better contracts. really if we could have landed murray by trading johnson, this team would have looked a lot better this year . I think we might have shot our selves in the foot this year :( .

Edit: deng is now also injured. Taj is doing worse. this bulls team doesnt have the same depth as the previous bulls team did. Although both rose and noah have progressed significantly, the talent around them has regressed. last year we had the depth comparable to portland. Admittedly their big men are better, but we had the best guard rotation in the league last year. this year our rotation is not nearly the same level of depth. hopefully we get a shooter in the draft and find a quality big man.


with that in mind, injuries have doomed this bulls team to a terrible season.
 

TheStig

New member
Joined:
Apr 5, 2009
Posts:
3,636
Liked Posts:
38
Re:CBE 93: How many wins will the Bulls finish wit

How could our defense have fallen off, we have the 06-07 2nd team defensive, all world defender Kirk "feisty" Hinrich. Surely, his defense makes up for any deficiency on this team anywhere.
 

postdiction

New member
Joined:
Jun 16, 2009
Posts:
118
Liked Posts:
0
#1 Deng's injuries while not severe enough for him to be out have caused him to play poorly. He has been a very consistent scorer for the Bulls the entire season until a few games ago. As you yourself said, he has been inconsistent for the last few games and I believe it is his knee/stomach/calf problems that have led to this inconsistent play.
Better play from him and we might have won one or two games in this losing streak thus not being the #9 seed.


#2
They played pretty well before John showed up
They did NOT play well before Salmons got there. They are currently 5 games over .500 and I believe they are 11-1 since his arrival. So before he got there they were 5 games under. I don't know 5 games under in the east doesn't count as great in my book.


#3. See if you can follow me, you have said something along the lines of: "well look BGs having a bad season only because he has been injured and if he is healthy I am sure he will be much better and hey look at the Pistons they have had so many injuries otherwise they would be a decent team"

Thus saying it is okay for the Pistons to suck because they have had so many injuries. Yet when it happens to Bulls you refuse accept that when injuries occur there will be some drop of in play. Why is it okay for other players/teams to suck when injured but not for the Bulls?

With Noah we held opponents to the lowest fg% in the NBA. Go check what the what the opponent fg% has been recently. With Noah we were one of the best rebounding teams in the NBA now we are lucky if the opponent doesn't get an offensive rebound. Noah's loss is a direct cause for this drop in defense and rebounding.

While I agree with you that maybe if he had a better start to the season we wouldn't be in this position, to completely dismiss injuries to our key guys and say this Bulls team not being in the playoffs will be a horrible disappointment is being stubborn.

I strongly believe that if Noah and Deng were completely healthy we would be in the playoffs right now.

Oh and I didn't bring up BG you did:

dougthonus wrote:
For someone who says he doesn't want to talk about Gordon unless baited into it, you sure seem to bring up Gordon a lot.
 

Shakes

Iconoclast
Joined:
Apr 22, 2009
Posts:
3,857
Liked Posts:
142
Re:CBE 93: How many wins will the Bulls finish wit

TheStig wrote:
How could our defense have fallen off, we have the 06-07 2nd team defensive, all world defender Kirk "feisty" Hinrich. Surely, his defense makes up for any deficiency on this team anywhere.

One Fred in the thread is enough without having people doing their best Fred impersonation. ;)
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,601
Liked Posts:
7,413
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Re:CBE 93: How many wins will the Bulls finish wit

Shakes wrote:
TheStig wrote:
How could our defense have fallen off, we have the 06-07 2nd team defensive, all world defender Kirk "feisty" Hinrich. Surely, his defense makes up for any deficiency on this team anywhere.

One Fred in the thread is enough without having people doing their best Fred impersonation. ;)
Well by technicality you can say that whoever Hinrich is guarding will have an off night or whatever, but there's still 4 other guys who can run all over us with Deng, who's probably our 1st or 2nd best perimeter defender depending on how much you overrate Hinrich, and Taj, probably our 2nd best interior defender (which btw is far more important than perimeter D) out. Rose still isn't that great of a defender yet and Miller tries his best and sometimes succeeds, but he can't play heavy minutes. But really...Kirk should be swatting or stripping the ball away on defensive possession anyway, what a crappy defender he is turning out to be. Surely his feistyness alone should be worth 12 defensive stops. :p
 

TheStig

New member
Joined:
Apr 5, 2009
Posts:
3,636
Liked Posts:
38
Re:CBE 93: How many wins will the Bulls finish wit

Shakes wrote:
TheStig wrote:
How could our defense have fallen off, we have the 06-07 2nd team defensive, all world defender Kirk "feisty" Hinrich. Surely, his defense makes up for any deficiency on this team anywhere.

One Fred in the thread is enough without having people doing their best Fred impersonation. ;)

Lol, I was just trying to illustrate a point I always make. Front court defense is much more important.
 

TheStig

New member
Joined:
Apr 5, 2009
Posts:
3,636
Liked Posts:
38
Re:CBE 93: How many wins will the Bulls finish wit

clonetrooper264 wrote:
Shakes wrote:
TheStig wrote:
How could our defense have fallen off, we have the 06-07 2nd team defensive, all world defender Kirk "feisty" Hinrich. Surely, his defense makes up for any deficiency on this team anywhere.

One Fred in the thread is enough without having people doing their best Fred impersonation. ;)
Well by technicality you can say that whoever Hinrich is guarding will have an off night or whatever, but there's still 4 other guys who can run all over us with Deng, who's probably our 1st or 2nd best perimeter defender depending on how much you overrate Hinrich, and Taj, probably our 2nd best interior defender (which btw is far more important than perimeter D) out. Rose still isn't that great of a defender yet and Miller tries his best and sometimes succeeds, but he can't play heavy minutes. But really...Kirk should be swatting or stripping the ball away on defensive possession anyway, what a crappy defender he is turning out to be. Surely his feistyness alone should be worth 12 defensive stops. :p
Did you watch last nights game?
 

Top