Cisco Plans to Cut as Many as 10,000 jobs

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
http://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...-buoy-profit/2011/07/12/gIQAMGFVAI_story.html



Cisco Said to Plan Cutting as Many as 10,000 Jobs to Buoy Profit

By Ashlee Vance, Olga Kharif and Zachary Tracer, Published: July 11 | Updated: Tuesday, July 12, 8:00 AM



July 12 (Bloomberg) -- Cisco Systems Inc., the largest networking-equipment company, may cut as many as 10,000 jobs, or about 14 percent of its workforce, to revive profit growth, according to two people familiar with the plans.



The cuts include as many as 7,000 jobs that would be eliminated by the end of August, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the plans aren’t final. Cisco is also providing early-retirement packages to about 3,000 workers who accepted buyouts, the people said.



Cisco Chief Executive Officer John Chambers is slashing jobs and exiting less-profitable businesses as competitors such as Juniper Networks Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co. take market share in Cisco’s main businesses with lower-priced, simpler products. Sales of Cisco’s switches and routers, which made up more than half of revenue last year, will continue to slip, said Brian Marshall, an analyst at Gleacher & Co.



Eliminating jobs will help Cisco wring $1 billion in savings in fiscal 2012, the company said in May. Cisco expects costs of $500 million to $1.1 billion in the fiscal fourth quarter as a result of the voluntary early retirement program, it said in a quarterly filing.



“We will provide additional detail on the cost reductions, including layoffs, on our next earnings call,” Karen Tillman, a spokeswoman for San Jose, California-based Cisco, said in reference to an earnings call scheduled for early August. She declined to discuss job-cut figures.



‘Too Many Employees’



The voluntary retirement packages included one year’s pay and medical benefits, and were offered to about 5,800 employees, two people said.



“The revenue trajectory hasn’t been where it should be,” Marshall, who has a “neutral” rating on the stock with a target price of $17, said in an interview. “The company is not staffed on an appropriate level. They simply have too many employees.”



Cisco fell 31 cents, or 2 percent, to $15.43 yesterday on the Nasdaq Stock Market. The stock had dropped 24 percent this year before today, while the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index had risen 4.9 percent.



Analysts at Gleacher and Miller Tabak & Co. said yesterday that the company would cut at least 5,000 jobs as part of a turnaround effort.



Cisco’s share of worldwide switching revenue dropped 5.8 percentage points to 68.5 percent in the first quarter of 2011 from a year earlier, according to a May report from Dell’Oro Group, a Redwood City, California-based researcher. Hewlett- Packard gained switching share in that period.



Router Losses



In global router sales, Cisco lost 6.4 percentage points to 54.2 percent of the market, while Juniper gained, Dell’Oro said.



Cisco’s revenue is projected to rise 7 percent this year to $43 billion, less than the 11 percent growth posted in 2010, according to the average estimate of analysts in a Bloomberg survey. Analysts have an average stock target price of $20.62, Bloomberg data show.



Cisco said in May that it shuttered the Flip video-camera unit and cut 550 jobs. The company may eliminate more positions in the consumer-product unit, which makes Linksys home- networking equipment, Marshall said. Some investors have said the company should exit consumer products entirely to focus on traditional enterprise offerings such as routers and switches. Cisco’s equipment is used by corporate networks and telephone and Internet service providers to direct Web traffic.



Trimming about 5,000 jobs would reduce operating expenses by about $1 billion annually and boost 2012 earnings by about 8 percent, Marshall said.



The company is also reorganizing management to streamline its business and focus on areas of growth, Cisco said in May. To speed decision making, the company organized field operations into three geographic regions and reformed a council-style management structure.



So now, profits are not enough...profit growth must be maintained. Nevermind they said nothing about not being able to afford these positions to remain profitable...just that they are not profitable ENOUGH right now. So more people will be jobless soon, great.
 

Kerfuffle

New member
Joined:
Jul 12, 2010
Posts:
1,417
Liked Posts:
0
So now, profits are not enough...profit growth must be maintained. Nevermind they said nothing about not being able to afford these positions to remain profitable...just that they are not profitable ENOUGH right now. So more people will be jobless soon, great.

Pete - they have shareholders that they need to look out for and those shareholders want their investments to grow. Layoffs cut admin expenses and increase profitability. You need to look at this as a business decision and a sound one at that. No one wants to see layoffs and people thrown on the street but at the same time if companies didn't look out for their bottom line no one would be in business. Everyone is controlling costs and focusing on doing more with less especially in this deep recession.
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
they are the private sector, they have every right to do that. If we disagree with it we can protest by not buying their products and/or writing letters.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
Pete - they have shareholders that they need to look out for and those shareholders want their investments to grow. Layoffs cut admin expenses and increase profitability. You need to look at this as a business decision and a sound one at that. No one wants to see layoffs and people thrown on the street but at the same time if companies didn't look out for their bottom line no one would be in business. Everyone is controlling costs and focusing on doing more with less especially in this deep recession.

Not seeing my point at all.

FYI - I am a business major.



I personally think the stock market is one of the biggest problems with this country. I am all for privately owned businesses that put their own neck on the line in an effort to provide a service/product to the community in the name of making a living for themselves.

I am not in favor of an investment market that removes itself from the entire equation save one aspect: profit. Societies suffer greatly from this because artificial wealth is created through the investment market, and such is the case with Cisco, their board is essentially dictating that thousands of people go hungry and homeless tomorrow because they want more PROFIT.



The investors' pockets may get fatter but quite quickly a more indigent populus is less willing and able to buy products and services from that company, thereby draining demand, resulting in reduced sales...and PROFIT.



While this equation is extremely complex with lots of parenthesis and hypotheticals, it still comes down to A+B=C...or A-B=C.
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
Not seeing my point at all.

FYI - I am a business major.



I personally think the stock market is one of the biggest problems with this country. I am all for privately owned businesses that put their own neck on the line in an effort to provide a service/product to the community in the name of making a living for themselves.

I am not in favor of an investment market that removes itself from the entire equation save one aspect: profit. Societies suffer greatly from this because artificial wealth is created through the investment market, and such is the case with Cisco, their board is essentially dictating that thousands of people go hungry and homeless tomorrow because they want more PROFIT.



The investors' pockets may get fatter but quite quickly a more indigent populus is less willing and able to buy products and services from that company, thereby draining demand, resulting in reduced sales...and PROFIT.



While this equation is extremely complex with lots of parenthesis and hypotheticals, it still comes down to A+B=C...or A-B=C.





Wish GM woulda did something to help prices and jack their stock up. *******.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
I personally think the stock market is one of the biggest problems with this country.



BINGO!!! The best companies I worked for, were privately owned companies. Once they went public, they all went to shit. Gone were the pay raises, the good benefits, the ample budget and resources to get the job done. Their goals change from "being profitable and providing services" to "raising stock prices and pleasing investors and the board". 95% of the time that means cutting jobs and forcing those still employed to work twice as hard to accomplish the same thing. Being profitable simply isn't enough anymore. In order for a company to be a "good investment" they have to show ever increasing profits. It's all about the rich getting richer on the backs of the people that make it possible in the first place.



**** big business.
 

roshinaya

fnord
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,533
Liked Posts:
440
The investors' pockets may get fatter but quite quickly a more indigent populus is less willing and able to buy products and services from that company, thereby draining demand, resulting in reduced sales...and PROFIT.



And there lies the inherent paradox of capitalism. And the idea of infinite growth with finite resources is absurd.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
And there lies the inherent paradox of capitalism. And the idea of infinite growth with finite resources is absurd.

SciFi fans and writers surmise that aliens will come here to drain us of our natural resources one day...wrong! We will be the ones going to other planets to do that. All in the name of greed.
 

BiscuitintheBasket

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,802
Liked Posts:
0
Some info from a company insider.



There are a high number of retirees that will come of this, somewhere in the neighborhood of 50% of the cuts. These people will be given a nice severance package of at least 1 year of pay at their current levels.



Linksys and Flip have been a money sieve for Cisco , and with Flip being shutdown that was about 500 jobs cut that were not stateside, and a small amount of administrative stateside(~30-70 people). About 2.5k of the jobs to be cut are from overseas assembly lines tied to Linksys.



About an 1k of the jobs were employee's that Cisco contracted out to help businesses with setups and upgrades. Most have barely had 2 assignments a month. These all were in the 150k-300k salary range.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
Good to hear that the US workforce won't bear the brunt of these cuts.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
Bisquit, the article indicates much of what you said.



However, it doesn't support my platform that greed and profit GROWTH are killing us...so zip it! lol
 

BiscuitintheBasket

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,802
Liked Posts:
0
Bisquit, the article indicates much of what you said.



However, it doesn't support my platform that greed and profit GROWTH are killing us...so zip it! lol





LOL!



No I am not happy about the losses, but it is primarily from the failing divisions of the company. Just one of those decision points for the company to keep floating the failing divisions (from what I understand Flip had no profit in it's entirety), or kill it. When business need to give up 95%+ of their profit it is hard to keep something floating....now some of that giving up it towards salaries; and some wayyyyyy to high, IMO.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
They can thank the smart phone industry for tanking the flip. My parents got one in a raffle I believe. I think they used it twice in the last couple of years that they had it.
 

jaxhawksfan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
2,490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Back in Jax
I guess in the end it all comes down to perspective. I see corporations in general as a person or group of people who produce products or perform services that people want to pay for. They price them as the market will bear, and they usually have to employ people to do the work because they can't do it all by themselves. They pay these people what they believe the work should pay. They take the initial risk because they believe they can succeed and make tons of money. When they no longer make the kind of money that makes the risk worthwhile, they close the company. The person or group of people didn't start the company to provide jobs for people, they started it to make money.
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,852
Liked Posts:
2,553
I have no problem with a company killing off failing parts of their organization. I am a big proponent of letting things that are failing fail. And I won't take this part political. And it's not like they didn't try to turn around the failing parts of the company for several years before cutting them loose. I don't really have a problem with what they are doing and in the long run they will be a much stronger company with much higher profits who will be able to expand in the areas they are strongest and hire back a lot of these lost jobs into a sector of the company that will be much more likely to sustain them.
 

Top