mdj89
New member
- Joined:
- Dec 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 37
- Liked Posts:
- 3
- Location:
- Burton, TX
Could the white sox actually move to another city because of there fan attendance at the ball park?
- Status
- Joined:
- Jun 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 7,127
- Liked Posts:
- 3,072
- Location:
- Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
lol no.
brett05
867-5309
- Joined:
- Apr 28, 2009
- Posts:
- 27,226
- Liked Posts:
- 4,579
- Location:
- Hell
Of course. But the attendance is kinda on track for the team. And I believe they are committed to be here for sometime contractually.
BigSoxHurt35
New member
- Joined:
- Jul 20, 2010
- Posts:
- 2,248
- Liked Posts:
- 443
JFC delete this Special person thread. Could the cubs actually move because they play worse than a AAA team?
- Joined:
- Dec 9, 2013
- Posts:
- 13,107
- Liked Posts:
- 4,276
They should. The ballpark is always empty. Only one of the five major teams in this city that can't fill it's stadium. They don't belong in this town.
Tampabear
Active member
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 653
- Liked Posts:
- 245
- Location:
- Tampa Bay
The question should be could they move to another city because they lose too much money? Local broadcasting, corporate sponsorship, and shared national broadcast revenue are all factored in. The answer is obviously NO. The comment not belonging in town as 1 of 5 teams that can't fill the stadium is idiotic at best. Using that criteria well over 20 of the MLB teams, including the Yankees, don't belong in their their towns.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
closed due to the stupidity of this thread.
Sent from my Rotary Phone using Tapatalk
Sent from my Rotary Phone using Tapatalk
- Status