- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 12,227
- Liked Posts:
- 3,847
only give up Paredes, Wesneski, and Cam Smith, dealing Smith hurts, but otherwise a great deal !!!
they will move Bellinger to free up some of the needed funds to keep Tucker, nice try thoughCubs overpaid for one year rental..
Tauchman signed with the White Sox days ago and Madrigal's been gone for weeks.No way they aren't going to get a long term deal done with Tucker. They'll have to take whatever they can get for Bellinger and maybe Tauchman is worth something.
3b has been a glaring problem for years. Morel is a distant memory. Paredes was never more than just a guy though he started hitting at the end of the season when it didn't matter. Wisdom was never an every day player and Mastrobuoni is not a long term answer. I like Madrigal more than most of CCS seems to but he can't stay healthy for more than five minutes.
I don't think they overpaid for him as he is a good player but he IS a rental unless they change the way they do things.Cubs overpaid for one year rental..
the sox and bears have 2 in that same period of time, so try not ti pound your chest and jack off about itGood player. But they won't give the money he will be looking for to anyone. It will be a rental. And @hyatt151 run of two teams and one championship over 60 years, rolls on.
they did with Bellinger when he hit free agency, and I'm confident they will extend him whether he hits free agency or notI don't think they overpaid for him as he is a good player but he IS a rental unless they change the way they do things.
No way they aren't going to get a long term deal done with Tucker. They'll have to take whatever they can get for Bellinger and maybe Tauchman is worth something.
3b has been a glaring problem for years. Morel is a distant memory. Paredes was never more than just a guy though he started hitting at the end of the season when it didn't matter. Wisdom was never an every day player and Mastrobuoni is not a long term answer. I like Madrigal more than most of CCS seems to but he can't stay healthy for more than five minutes.
Too late!the sox and bears have 2 in that same period of time, so try not ti pound your chest and jack off about it
One in 60 plus years....LOLOLOLOLOLOL. Nice choice of teams. Look at the teams under my avatar, dumbass. I've been witness to 11....even the fucking White Sox won one. You really know how to pick'em, ace.the sox and bears have 2 in that same period of time, so try not ti pound your chest and jack off about it
Good to knowTauchman signed with the White Sox days ago and Madrigal's been gone for weeks.
I agree any move like this is dumb if they don't re-sign him. I'd offer him 10 years 450 million today.More i've been thinking about it the more it doesn't make sense to me unless the cubs seriously will attempt to re-sign him which is contrary to the early reporting. Like i get the idea of it being a win now type thing but "winning now" by creating a giant hole at 3B which you had last year and cost you? You're essentially swapping Belli and Tucker as players in terms of "adds". Even if you say tucker is +5 wins over Belli which would be a monster season that gets you to 88 minus whatever you lose vs Parades at 3B vs their current hole.
Like if they were a 90 win team last year and did this then I can sorta see the logic of trying to win now and figuring it out later because you could probably have a realistic shot at a title. But the cubs are at least 1 big piece probably 2 away from that. Having said that, I don't think it's a guarantee the cubs get it done but I sorta have to believe the idea of this trade is to re-sign him. Tucker also kinda fits the mold of player they have been going for. Solid defender. Seems to be a high character guy a la dansby. Contact profile vs masher.
If they aren't actually prepared to go to like $400 mil then i have serious questions about the front office. Like what are we doing here?
I agree any move like this is dumb if they don't re-sign him. I'd offer him 10 years 450 million today.
I dont think the 3b hole is an issue though because I think they could sign a FA better than Paredes. I also think shaw or triantos will be the best 3b they've had since Bryant
More i've been thinking about it the more it doesn't make sense to me unless the cubs seriously will attempt to re-sign him which is contrary to the early reporting. Like i get the idea of it being a win now type thing but "winning now" by creating a giant hole at 3B which you had last year and cost you? You're essentially swapping Belli and Tucker as players in terms of "adds". Even if you say tucker is +5 wins over Belli which would be a monster season that gets you to 88 minus whatever you lose vs Parades at 3B vs their current hole.
Like if they were a 90 win team last year and did this then I can sorta see the logic of trying to win now and figuring it out later because you could probably have a realistic shot at a title. But the cubs are at least 1 big piece probably 2 away from that. Having said that, I don't think it's a guarantee the cubs get it done but I sorta have to believe the idea of this trade is to re-sign him. Tucker also kinda fits the mold of player they have been going for. Solid defender. Seems to be a high character guy a la dansby. Contact profile vs masher.
If they aren't actually prepared to go to like $400 mil then i have serious questions about the front office. Like what are we doing here?