Cubs neighbors want more open space, less parking in triangle project

85Bears4life

Bears Hall Of Famer
Donator
Joined:
Aug 12, 2010
Posts:
8,292
Liked Posts:
3,054
Cubs neighbors want more open space, less parking in triangle project - Chicago Sun-Times

The Cubs are asking architects to redesign the long-stalled triangle building promised in exchange for a 1,791-seat expansion of the Wrigley Field bleachers, armed with a survey that shows area residents want less parking and more open space.
dt.common.streams.StreamServer.cls


The original plan called for a seven-story building dominated by a parking garage. The design also included an upscale restaurant, retail stores specializing in Cubs merchandise, team offices, below-ground batting cages and a rooftop garden.

The Internet survey conducted June 7-12 by Atlanta-based Alexander Babbage Inc. asked residents within a mile of the ballpark what features they favored.

The results were overwhelming.

Of the 785 responding residents, only 22 percent want the Cubs to build the 400 parking spaces included in the planned development approved by the City Council.

The rest want to eliminate parking altogether at that location or dramatically reduce the number of spaces to leave more open space.

Specific outdoor activities favored in an open-air plaza include: holiday festivals (81 percent); live music (79 percent); movies in the park (78 percent); a permanent outdoor skating rink (56 percent), and viewing parties for Cubs road games (51 percent).

Inside the smaller building, residents want: a casual dining restaurant (75 percent); a sports museum (59 percent), and an upscale food market or deli (55 percent). Less desirable elements include: upscale dining (42 percent); a hotel (38 percent); a bakery (36 percent), and a bowling alley (36 percent).

The survey also showed 85 percent of Wrigley neighbors want more concerts at the ballpark, such as the upcoming July 31 and Aug. 1 shows by Paul McCartney, and 89 percent appreciate “neighborhood protections” tied to those events.

Around the same time as the Internet survey, sources said the Cubs conducted a telephone poll to gauge public support for using tax dollars to help renovate Wrigley. The poll specifically tested public sentiment for using taxes on amusements, restaurant meals and hotel rooms to help pay for it. Those results have not yet been analyzed.

The triangle building has already been redesigned once by former Cubs owner and Tribune Co. CEO Sam Zell.

Now, it’s back to the drawing board. Sources said the redesign might include a shorter structure built around an open square filled by an ice rink in the winter and a farmer’s market and outdoor concerts in the summer. Lost retail and parking revenues could be recouped by selling corporate naming rights to the plaza.

“By building more open space, we change the economics of both the construction and the potential for commercial space. We have to find the right balance,” said Mike Lufrano, Cubs general counsel and executive vice president of community affairs.

Lufrano said he’s not surprised by the thumbs-down on parking. “Bringing 400 additional cars right to the center of Clark and Addison adds traffic to the heart of the intersection that gets the most congested during Wrigley Field events,” he said. “If we can find a solution that moves the parking somewhere else, many of our neighbors would appreciate it. It won’t eliminate the parking. It’ll just find a better location for it.”

The final price tag for the triangle building will determine how much public support Cubs Chairman Tom Ricketts needs to rebuild Wrigley.

Mayor Rahm Emanuel has called Ricketts’ plan to use 35 years’ worth of amusement tax growth to renovate the 97-year-old stadium a “nonstarter.”

Financing alternatives include: reviving Zell’s failed plan to have the state buy and renovate Wrigley; modifying the amusement tax plan to give the city some growth; creating a tax-increment financing district around Wrigley; using historic preservation tax credits or broadening the boundaries of a 1 percent tax on downtown restaurant meals used to finance McCormick Place. That boundary now extends as far north as Diversey.

Another, more controversial idea is the sale of personal seat licenses similar to the Soldier Field PSLs that helped provide the Chicago Bears’ contribution to their taxpayer-supported stadium.

If the Cubs can’t get any taxpayer assistance, there’s another possibility: scrap the triangle building altogether and pump all of the Ricketts family money into the landmark stadium.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
How about the area residents thank their lucky stars that the Cubs are driving up their property values and the local economics and shut the **** up and let the Cubs do whatever they want to maximize profits?
 

daddies3angels

Is it next year yet?
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
10,038
Liked Posts:
819
Location:
Peoria IL
More money spent not on the team. I know wrigley needs to be worked on but rather them put money to CHAMPIONSHIP team.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
More money spent not on the team. I know wrigley needs to be worked on but rather them put money to CHAMPIONSHIP team.

The issue is that because of the stadium condition and the lack of revenue streams other than Wrigley and merchandising, there's a lot that has to go into stadium upkeep that can't be spent on the team.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
Earlier I thought it was crazy that the Cubs would leave Wrigley, and I still think a lot of this is leverage. But each time something like this pops up, you would have to think that it makes it that much more likely the Cubs might head to the suburbs.
 

daddies3angels

Is it next year yet?
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
10,038
Liked Posts:
819
Location:
Peoria IL
Wrigley doesn't need to be worked on, it needs to be replaced.

i completely agree. My dad and i were talking and there has been one consistent thing in cubs history. There have been tons of different players, different managers, and different owneres but only 1 thing that has been around since they havent won a World Series and that is Wrigley Field. I truly its really hard to build a team there cause you cant predict the way the park will play from day to day. One day wind blowing in where u need a fast team and then the next the wind blowing out and team needs power hitters. Cubs need a 40 man active roster at wrigley
 

The Bandit

vick27m
Donator
Joined:
Oct 18, 2010
Posts:
2,076
Liked Posts:
579
Location:
The open road
We need a new damn stadium. I love Wrigley but its time. It is in a horrible spot. And the residents need to stfu its been there longer then they have been.
 

Rick

New member
Joined:
Apr 11, 2011
Posts:
874
Liked Posts:
315


This is just another reason why the Cubs need to get the **** out of Wrigley and build a state of the art stadium elsewhere. That neighborhood is going to continue to be a thorn in the Cubs' side as long as they're playing at Wrigley.

But I'd rather see Wrigley left as is and have all this money be put into the team. Winning the World Series should be the top priority.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Hello suburbs!
 

Top