Cubs to acquire Rick Porcello?

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
He is going to get paid more than he has produced so far as a big leaguer. For the Cubs it would offer a young pitcher ith some upside that could improve with just a move to the NL.
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Camp for Porcello. Get it done Theo.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
Nah Detroit should just commit to being the over the hill gang and trade Porcello for Soriano.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
I don't believe this rumor until it shows up on MLBTR :cubstroll:
 

Shawon0Meter

PLAYOFFS?!?
Donator
Joined:
Feb 9, 2011
Posts:
5,444
Liked Posts:
2,774
Location:
Minnesota
I can't trust a guy with under 2000 twitter followers
 

daddies3angels

Is it next year yet?
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
10,038
Liked Posts:
819
Location:
Peoria IL
Porcello be nice backend SP but dont think Cubs would give up much in trade. My guess Barney be the biggest piece
 

JosMin

Entirely too much tuna
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Nov 22, 2011
Posts:
8,201
Liked Posts:
3,271
Location:
Jeffersonville, Indiana
Porcello be nice backend SP but dont think Cubs would give up much in trade. My guess Barney be the biggest piece

Why would the Cubs trade Barney when the Tigers already have Omar Infante under contract through next year and have a young prospect in Eugenio Suarez who's being touted as a second baseman as opposed to a shortstop?
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
Why would the Cubs trade Barney when the Tigers already have Omar Infante under contract through next year and have a young prospect in Eugenio Suarez who's being touted as a second baseman as opposed to a shortstop?

Because bacon cheeseburger.

If they wanted to get Porcello they'd probably trade someone like Brett Jackson or Vitters instead as a starter. Barney is valuable as a cheap 2B who doesn't suck.
 

Kleats

New member
Joined:
Sep 27, 2012
Posts:
411
Liked Posts:
66
Location:
Mokena
I think Barney is going to gradually get better and better so I wouldn't trade him ( unless they can get a solid solid young pitcher for him ) . And I'm talking the kind who will be around for at least 5+ yrs .
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
I think Barney is going to gradually get better and better so I wouldn't trade him ( unless they can get a solid solid young pitcher for him ) . And I'm talking the kind who will be around for at least 5+ yrs .

He's still young enough. They'd basically be extending him through his prime and the money is probably a wise investment for the glove alone. The bat needs improvement though.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
I can't trust a guy with under 2000 twitter followers

to you and your thanker....he would have a lot more if he never left 670 the score. he was a beat reporter for quite sometime and pretty good with his craft.
 

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
What about Carlos Marmol, 4-5 million for Porcello? The Tigers do need RP and their close Valverde is gone. I think they have had interest in Marmol too, it seems like a fair deal to me and I would do it.
 

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
Please get him.

He's terrible and I would love the Tigers to keep him, but for whatever reason, he owns the Sox (as most shitty pitchers do).
 

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
The Chicago Cubs are once again linked to starting pitcher Rick Porcello of the Detroit Tigers. George Ofman tweeted a few days; "now that Miggy has won the MVP, will the Tigers deal Rick Procello to the Cubs? Told there is a little smoke here".

The Cubs have been linked to Porcello for about a year now. Manly when the Tigers and Cubs were discussing starting pitcher Matt Garza. Porcello was one of the names being mentioned to come over in a trade for Garza. But as you know, the trade didn't happened and the Tigers went to play B Anibal Sanchez.

Since Porcello's rookie season, his stats have gone down and made him a likely trade candidate. The Tigers haven't found a trade partner yet, but it seems like Porcello will be traded this Winter.

As a Tiger, Porcello is 48-42 with a 4.55 era, 384 strikeouts and has walked 180 in 691.2 innings. He does not walk much, but he is a contact pitcher. That can have it's ups and downs as a MLB pitcher. As I said before, his stats do not look great. However, he'll only be 24 on December 27th and the Cubs can wait for him. Porcello can be a project and the Cubs can take their time on him.

I had a trade proposal (all speculation on my part):

Cubs get:
SP Rick Porcello

Tigers get:
RP Carlos Marmol
6 million

Cubs' reasoning: The Cubs want to trade Marmol and have been trying for a while now. They want to move on from Marmol and by this trade, they'll be able to. Porcello will come in and be inserted into the starting rotation right away. Porcello can then work on his stuff each and every game.
Tigers' reasoning: The Tigers seem like the want to trade Porcello as soon as they can. They will get a valuable RP for a season at 3.8 million. They do need arms and a closer. Their closer for the past few seasons (Jose Valverde) is expected to find another team through free agency. Also, Porcello is going to cost too much money via arbitration and the Tigers don't want to pay him.

The Cubs and Tigers could make the trade bigger too. The Tigers have had interest in 2B Darwin Barney and the Cubs like 3B Nick Castellanos. I don't know if the Cubs can land Castellanos as he was nearly listed "untouchable" a few months ago. He'll cost too much to obtain and I don't even know if the Tigers would even trade him.

The Winter Meetings is about 3 weeks away and maybe we will hear more about Porcello leading up to the meetings, plus other trade candidates.

http://www.chicitysports.com/2012/11/17/could-the-chicago-cubs-trade-for-rick-porcello/
 

daddies3angels

Is it next year yet?
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
10,038
Liked Posts:
819
Location:
Peoria IL
everything i been reading they have a kid they want closing next year. But to me this would make sense for insurance for DET
 

Top