Cubs To Determine Deadline Approach

daddies3angels

Is it next year yet?
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
10,038
Liked Posts:
819
Location:
Peoria IL
Members of the Cubs' front office will meet early next week to determine their approach for this summer’s trade deadline, according to Bruce Levine of ESPNChicago.com. The team intends to pursue top prospects and young players, but the details have yet to be determined, according to Levine.

It appears likely that the 30-44 Cubs will become sellers, in which case some pricey veterans could become trade bait. Aramis Ramirez won’t be one of them, since he won’t approve a trade, but Carlos Zambrano, Alfonso Soriano and Kosuke Fukudome may find themselves on the trade market. Zambrano and Soriano have said they wouldn’t block trades.

GM Jim Hendry and assistant GM Randy Bush will direct top Cubs scouts during the meetings. Hendry will advise the scouts to monitor the clubs he believes match up best as possible trade partners for Chicago.


MLB Rumors - MLBTradeRumors.com

Of course there going to target top prospects but NO TEAM going to give any up for any players Cubs have avaible LMAO


EDIT: http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/news/story?id=6696180

another article on it
 
Last edited:

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
JH will meet top scouts July 1st and go from there. But they do that every year. The time is coming....per Sully.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
Mostly salary dump deals. If they get anything back it's icing on the cake. The goal should be to relieve payroll, not to restock the farm here.
 

cubsneedmiracle

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 28, 2010
Posts:
7,474
Liked Posts:
1,778
Mostly salary dump deals. If they get anything back it's icing on the cake. The goal should be to relieve payroll, not to restock the farm here.

I think we can do both.. It just won't be a drastic restock..

We should take some looks at guys who might be a little farther away but have high potentials.. Just need a lot of seasoning.

I'd be fine with doing that.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
I think we can do both.. It just won't be a drastic restock..

We should take some looks at guys who might be a little farther away but have high potentials.. Just need a lot of seasoning.

I'd be fine with doing that.

You presume that there are GMs less intelligent than our own :D
 

cubsneedmiracle

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 28, 2010
Posts:
7,474
Liked Posts:
1,778
You presume that there are GMs less intelligent than our own :D

No of course not..

In every system there are always guys that have high ceilings but are very far away.

Knowing that.. we should be able to pry a few of these players away while shedding salary.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
It is called getting rid of "bad" money. The Ricketts are looking for salary relief. Dont expect another GM to be like "yeah Il take that contract, and hell,,,,,il give you some prospects too" cmon now lets not get crazy.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
It is called getting rid of "bad" money. The Ricketts are looking for salary relief. Dont expect another GM to be like "yeah Il take that contract, and hell,,,,,il give you some prospects too" cmon now lets not get crazy.

they have to give us something...it is a "trade" afterall
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
It is called getting rid of "bad" money. The Ricketts are looking for salary relief. Dont expect another GM to be like "yeah Il take that contract, and hell,,,,,il give you some prospects too" cmon now lets not get crazy.

It depends what we are talking about here. If we are talking about Alfonso Soriano, of course just getting the waiver fee to be rid of the rest of his contract would be outstanding. If we are talking about Carlos Pena though that is a different story, especially if the Cubs pick up the deferred money.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
It depends what we are talking about here. If we are talking about Alfonso Soriano, of course just getting the waiver fee to be rid of the rest of his contract would be outstanding. If we are talking about Carlos Pena though that is a different story, especially if the Cubs pick up the deferred money.

totally different on the pena situation and the cubs picking up the def money.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
totally different on the pena situation and the cubs picking up the def money.

So again I don't think the Cubs will be too active, but I think two guys will be dealt and possibly more. Here is my breakdown of the situation:
1B Carlos Pena-I think is the biggest chip we have. If the Cubs pick up the deferred money he is only making 5 million. That is a steal for a left handed bat that will hit you 30 homeruns, get on base, and play a very good 1B. The Cubs ought to be able to get a legitimate prospect or two for him.

Kosuke Fukudome-The Cubs would love to be rid of him, and this year there might be a market for him. He is overpaid for his production at 13.5 million, but a team should be interested in a guy with an OBP over .400 and capable of playing all 3 OF spots. The amount of money should determine what the Cubs are able to get for him. If the Cubs pick up a fair chunk of the salary, you should be able to get some actual prospects back.

Aramis Ramirez-Is not going to be traded. He has said that he won't accept a trade, but more importantly his 14 million dollar team option becomes guaranteed if he is traded. No team is going to take him on with that option year kicking in.

Alfonso Soriano-Is not going to be traded. Soriano may be more than content to play for whoever, but the Cubs won't be lucky enough to find someone to pay for him. And if the Cubs are going to have to pay for him, they might as well get the .800 OPS production out of him that he provides.

Carlos Zambrano-Again I don't think is going to be traded because he is worth more to the Cubs than other teams. A lot of people seem to think that the Cubs will have to pay the vast majority of the salary and get nothing back to move him. If that is the case, the Cubs are better off getting the production if they are going to have to pay for him.

Ryan Dempster-Can basically plug in the same information about Aramis Ramirez here. Dempster's option is a player option and if he pitches like he has since May 1st, he will earn that player option.

John Grabow-Hasn't been good, but teams are always looking for relievers, particularly left handed relievers. He makes 4.8 million so you aren't getting much for him even if you pick up some of the salary, and you probably have to get anyone interested in him.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
They should just DFA Grabow.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
They should just DFA Grabow.

I think the Cubs get nothing back for him but I could see them picking up half his salary and trading him for a PTBNL that turns into a small amount of cash down the road.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
I think the Cubs get nothing back for him but I could see them picking up half his salary and trading him for a PTBNL that turns into a small amount of cash down the road.

We can ask the question a different way...if you were a GM of a contending club, would you want John Grabow?
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
We can ask the question a different way...if you were a GM of a contending club, would you want John Grabow?

Want John Grabow? Of course I don't want John Grabow or think that he is the piece that gets my team over the hump. That said teams are always looking for relievers, and there are a number of teams that could use Grabow as a lefty in the pen. Just a quick glance through the stats for relievers in the National League these three teams popped up: Washington, Milwaukee, Arizona.

Are we going to get anything for Grabow? No of course not, but I wouldn't be shocked if the Cubs could find a contender that needed a lefty handed reliever that didn't want to part with anything to get it.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
Want John Grabow? Of course I don't want John Grabow or think that he is the piece that gets my team over the hump. That said teams are always looking for relievers, and there are a number of teams that could use Grabow as a lefty in the pen. Just a quick glance through the stats for relievers in the National League these three teams popped up: Washington, Milwaukee, Arizona.

Are we going to get anything for Grabow? No of course not, but I wouldn't be shocked if the Cubs could find a contender that needed a lefty handed reliever that didn't want to part with anything to get it.

Certainly it's possible, but I think the Cubs are better off just releasing him :D
 

Top