Shakes
Iconoclast
- Joined:
- Apr 22, 2009
- Posts:
- 3,857
- Liked Posts:
- 142
We often have players labelled as bad defenders, or not trying on the defensive end, or being lockdown defenders. But after the Skiles and Del Negro experiences in Chicago, can we really be so sure that it's the players?
Now obviously no experiment on how much a coach means is perfect, because you never get exactly the same players, injuries, etc. But Skiles this year improved the Bucks 5 points per 100 possessions. He showed a pretty similar effect in his other coaching stops.
Of the players who played enough minutes to qualify this season, 19 players had a +5 or better defensive impact on 82games defensive +/- list. When you consider Skiles' +5 is in effect over the whole 48 minutes, there were only 4 players in the entire league who had as big a defensive impact statistically as Milwaukee changing its coach did.
Is the real 2010 question not whether we can get a star player, but a star coach to return us to league leading defence?
Now obviously no experiment on how much a coach means is perfect, because you never get exactly the same players, injuries, etc. But Skiles this year improved the Bucks 5 points per 100 possessions. He showed a pretty similar effect in his other coaching stops.
Of the players who played enough minutes to qualify this season, 19 players had a +5 or better defensive impact on 82games defensive +/- list. When you consider Skiles' +5 is in effect over the whole 48 minutes, there were only 4 players in the entire league who had as big a defensive impact statistically as Milwaukee changing its coach did.
Is the real 2010 question not whether we can get a star player, but a star coach to return us to league leading defence?