ESPN Guys on the Bulls and the Playoffs

Hoover

New member
Joined:
Apr 7, 2009
Posts:
26
Liked Posts:
0
I still think it's amazing how little respect BG gets in Chicago. Is there anyway we can trade BG for Deng?
 

dougthonus

New member
Joined:
Mar 13, 2009
Posts:
2,665
Liked Posts:
9
I'm interested to know what they say, but not interested enough to recap it.

I'd pay $100 for a program that could take any video submission and then transcribe it for me automatically. I don't want to spend 5 minutes watching a video that can probably be summed up in text I could read in 10 seconds.
 

dougthonus

New member
Joined:
Mar 13, 2009
Posts:
2,665
Liked Posts:
9
Hoover wrote:
I still think it's amazing how little respect BG gets in Chicago. Is there anyway we can trade BG for Deng?

Probably not.
 

??? ??????

New member
Joined:
Apr 2, 2009
Posts:
2,435
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Columbia, MO
All of the analysis was Jamal Mashburn with the Mike Yam asking the questions.

[ul][li]Won't win a series, but I look for special things in the future from the Chicago Bulls.[/li]
[li]I don't see where Luol Deng fits in right now. Chemistry is at an all time high. Get along, play unselfish basketball. This core group right now is very impressive. Playing well for first year coach Vinny Del Negro[/li]
[li]Rose understands now that there are three levels to the NBA. Preseason, regular season, and postseason. Intensity really jumps up in the postseason. He will now know how to play playoff basketball. The intensity is a lot different from regular season.
[/li]
[li]Ben Gordon will get a chance to show his tools, that he should be paid big money in Chicago.[/li][/ul]
 

Ralphb07

New member
Joined:
Mar 29, 2009
Posts:
490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Palm Bay FL
The more I think about I feel Gordon will be back and there's one main reason why

Paxson and VDN like him more than Kirk. Who is starting right now? Who plays 40 minutes regardless and 35 at the very least. The playoffs helps Gordon staying too. I think he will be signed and Kirk will be the one gone.

We'll go into the season with Rose-Gordon-Deng and Salmons will come off the bench backing up both Gordon and Deng.
 

charity stripe

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
364
Liked Posts:
1
BG seems to be getting more national attention these days. I think there is a good chance he will make the all-star team next season, regardless of what team he is on.
 

??? ??????

New member
Joined:
Apr 2, 2009
Posts:
2,435
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Columbia, MO
charity stripe wrote:
BG seems to be getting more national attention these days. I think there is a good chance he will make the all-star team next season, regardless of what team he is on.

I think if he signs with Cleveland or Miami, he will be a lock for the Allstar team. If he stays with the Bulls, I think he will be a very strong contender.
 

senrad

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
203
Liked Posts:
1
Location:
Florida
Hoover wrote:
I still think it's amazing how little respect BG gets in Chicago. Is there anyway we can trade BG for Deng?

Solid lulz in this post.

Mashburn makes a good point relating to team chemistry. Everybody seems to be on the same page for once.
 

the_future420

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
29
Liked Posts:
0
Ralphb07 wrote:
The more I think about I feel Gordon will be back and there's one main reason why

Paxson and VDN like him more than Kirk. Who is starting right now? Who plays 40 minutes regardless and 35 at the very least. The playoffs helps Gordon staying too. I think he will be signed and Kirk will be the one gone.

We'll go into the season with Rose-Gordon-Deng and Salmons will come off the bench backing up both Gordon and Deng.

It would be a travesty if Deng started over Salmons next year but thats probably what will happen simply because Wesley can be the first sub at either the 2 or the 3 and Deng can really only play sf
 

fola

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
388
Liked Posts:
1
Location:
Los Angeles
dougthonus wrote:
I'm interested to know what they say, but not interested enough to recap it.

I'd pay $100 for a program that could take any video submission and then transcribe it for me automatically. I don't want to spend 5 minutes watching a video that can probably be summed up in text I could read in 10 seconds.

I tell you what, give me the $100 (per hour) and i'll traanscribe whatever you need :)
 

??? ??????

New member
Joined:
Apr 2, 2009
Posts:
2,435
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Columbia, MO
the_future420 wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:
The more I think about I feel Gordon will be back and there's one main reason why

Paxson and VDN like him more than Kirk. Who is starting right now? Who plays 40 minutes regardless and 35 at the very least. The playoffs helps Gordon staying too. I think he will be signed and Kirk will be the one gone.

We'll go into the season with Rose-Gordon-Deng and Salmons will come off the bench backing up both Gordon and Deng.

It would be a travesty if Deng started over Salmons next year but thats probably what will happen simply because Wesley can be the first sub at either the 2 or the 3 and Deng can really only play sf

Vinny said he was going to move Deng to the bench and Salmons into the starting lineup, even if the injury didn't occur. So if Salmons is the better player next year, I think he will get the start over Luol. Rose, Gordon, Thomas, and Noah are pretty much locks as starters if they come back next year, imo, with largely the same team in place. Salmons/Deng will have to fight for the starting small forward spot.
 

fola

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
388
Liked Posts:
1
Location:
Los Angeles
dougthonus wrote:
There's a large difference between $100 and $100 an hour.

Alright, fine. $50.

You drive a hard bargain Thonus.
 

The Mule

New member
Joined:
Dec 11, 2011
Posts:
722
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Vancouver
Yes, some idiotic, subhuman douchebag was shooting people yesterday, but in the world of smart people scientists something great happened. The rover, Curiosity, landed on Mars and sent back some amazing photos. Now that it's landed this little robot will allow for some amazing research. Humanity, you are not always the worst.



http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/0...ity-makes-historic-landing-beams-back-photos/
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
Yes, some idiotic, subhuman douchebag was shooting people yesterday, but in the world of smart people scientists something great happened. The rover, Curiosity, landed on Mars and sent back some amazing photos. Now that it's landed this little robot will allow for some amazing research. Humanity, you are not always the worst.



http://news.national...ms-back-photos/



Oh look another fucking robot *yawn* wake me up when NASA does something cool like build a base on the Moon or sends you know PEOPLE to Mars.



Sorry I understand it is probably scientifically valuable. But it isn't sexy. It is really just old hat. I had a rant on the boards awhile ago about NASA needing two faces (Public sexy one, less private more scientific one). No need to rehash it but yeah sending robots to Mars just doesn't do it for me. I think the Voyager probe is more interesting since last I heard we still were getting data from it and it is beyond the solar system, so that thing is still cool. Sending the billionth robot to mars....meh
 

The Mule

New member
Joined:
Dec 11, 2011
Posts:
722
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Vancouver
Oh look another fucking robot *yawn* wake me up when NASA does something cool like build a base on the Moon or sends you know PEOPLE to Mars.



Sorry I understand it is probably scientifically valuable. But it isn't sexy. It is really just old hat. I had a rant on the boards awhile ago about NASA needing two faces (Public sexy one, less private more scientific one). No need to rehash it but yeah sending robots to Mars just doesn't do it for me. I think the Voyager probe is more interesting since last I heard we still were getting data from it and it is beyond the solar system, so that thing is still cool. Sending the billionth robot to mars....meh



Good thing the robots on Mars are not there to "do it for you." Because that would be awkward and potentially messy.



Getting data about the atmosphere on Mars seems relevant to our interests since we are totally fucking up our planet and can glean a lot about how their shit potentially got fucked up. Beyond the solar system stuff actually seems "sexier" to me as it is not in fact that relevant to our more immediate concerns and seems like more of a jerking off mission. Wheeee! Look at what we can do way out here is super far out outer space, mofos!



I don't think there is ever going to be anything 'sexy' about NASA, nor do I think it's a bad idea to get people interested in any level of research or exploration since most people are not paying attention to anything remotely scientific or research oriented in their daily lives. Unless reading about celebrity Botox on Gawker is considered scientific research.



Should we stop exploring parts of the ocean because it's totally "been there, done that?" Should we abandon cancer or AIDS or mental illness or other types of research because we're, like, over it? I think not.



Mostly, I posted this to just make a point that humans are not all pieces of giant garbage and have the capacity to do something better than shoot up the damn place. Even though something horrible has happened somewhere, something great and, I think, innovative, happened somewhere not that far away.
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
Good thing the robots on Mars are not there to "do it for you." Because that would be awkward and potentially messy.



Getting data about the atmosphere on Mars seems relevant to our interests since we are totally fucking up our planet and can glean a lot about how their shit potentially got fucked up. Beyond the solar system stuff actually seems "sexier" to me as it is not in fact that relevant to our more immediate concerns and seems like more of a jerking off mission. Wheeee! Look at what we can do way out here is super far out outer space, mofos!



I don't think there is ever going to be anything 'sexy' about NASA, nor do I think it's a bad idea to get people interested in any level of research or exploration since most people are not paying attention to anything remotely scientific or research oriented in their daily lives. Unless reading about celebrity Botox on Gawker is considered scientific research.



Should we stop exploring parts of the ocean because it's totally "been there, done that?" Should we abandon cancer or AIDS or mental illness or other types of research because we're, like, over it? I think not.



Mostly, I posted this to just make a point that humans are not all pieces of giant garbage and have the capacity to do something better than shoot up the damn place. Even though something horrible has happened somewhere, something great and, I think, innovative, happened somewhere not that far away.



So putting a person on a celestial body isn't sexy? ya know like we did in 69'



Here's my thing I'm sure this robot will collect valuable data. However the hype to me seems silly, it is just another robot.
 

nana

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
662
Liked Posts:
0
The otters approve of this great achievement!



111203875_0d552a39ec_z.jpg




[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oBv2y1MPnv4[/youtube]
 

Top