Gordon has never been more popular

Diddy1122

I ain't your pal dickface
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
4,459
Liked Posts:
1,155
Location:
Chicago
Last summer, you had a hard time finding anyone who thought the Bulls were losing much when they let Ben Gordon get away.

Now, all of a sudden, it has become obvious to - of all people - even Scott Skiles that Gordon had certain skills not easily replaced.

After the Bucks' loss to the Lakers on Wednesday night, Skiles was discussing the return of Michael Redd when he came dangerously close to understanding Gordon.

"(Redd has) bought into the system we're trying to play. I liken it a little to having Ben Gordon in Chicago," Skiles said. "If a guy can score, you have to give them the freedom to take their shots and make their plays.

"On occasion a guy is going to take a bad one because he is feeling it or whatever. They have to have the freedom to do that."

Of course, that freedom didn't exist when Skiles would yank Gordon off the floor any time he took a shot Skiles didn't like.

Skiles helped his favorite player, Kirk Hinrich, get that big, five-year extension on Halloween 2006, worth $47.5 million, and Skiles helped create the anti-Gordon sentiment in Chicago.

Granted, Gordon wasn't going to win you an NBA title this year, but he would have helped win some games, and he would have helped down the road when the Bulls get that title-worthy roster they believe they can still build.

But if they were being honest, Bulls management types would have told you when they lost Gordon that they thought they didn't need him.

You wonder what they think now that they have a team that can't score.

Furthermore, the Bulls are a team without a true go-to guy in the clutch, and someone who can provide that instant, fourth-quarter offense.

Gordon was fearless, as all great shooters have to be, especially with the clock winding down.

He had his faults, lots of them, and we all know what they were, especially on defense, but he filled a role and served a purpose, for better and sometimes worse.

And today the Bulls simply have no one with the guts to take those shots down the stretch, so it's become apparent that they miss Gordon, even to those who didn't much like him.

Fearless gunners are hard to find, which is why they make lots of money, and why most teams don't let them get away.

It's just a bit funny that it took Gordon leaving for him to become so popular in Chicago.

http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=345021

Skiles helped create the anti-Gordon sentiment in Chicago? Umm...not quite Roz. Try looking in the mirror once & you'll find the real culprit...YOU & the rest of the Special person media in this town. Skiles was a big BG fan. He put him in the starting lineup when all the drones & media asswipes were foaming at the mouth with anger. I don't seem to remember Skiles saying "You can't win with a small backcourt" or "Ben is best suited as a 6th man" or "Ben's defense is a hinderance on the court".

I like the fact that some of the media is starting to realize what we really lost this offseason, but enough with trying to shift the blame. Ben was run out of town by our assclown owner, his media minions, & the millions that populate the drone army.
 

Kush77

New member
Joined:
Mar 15, 2009
Posts:
2,096
Liked Posts:
150
Typical Chicago media wind sock. Now Gordon is missed and the things that he brings to the table (things that Fred and I have said over and over and over again on our shows over the last two years) are now written about by these clowns.
 

st. park

New member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2009
Posts:
49
Liked Posts:
0
What a half-assed article. Why is it that whenever a Chicago sports media figure even tries to compliment BG, he has to preface it with this "despite all of his flaws" bullshit. You can list flaws for every single damn player in this league.
 

Top