- Joined:
- May 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,947
- Liked Posts:
- 3,118
Joel Sherman for the NY Post wrote this article about the importance of organizations and chemistry and its importance in comparison to offseason moves. Here are some quotes.
I don't know as if I agree with this article, but it is interesting that many of the teams that were the big "winners" of free agency are struggling right now. I would fall into the category of people who scoff at chemistry, but there is a reason that the Cards are able to field a winner consistently with a payroll typically below the Cubs. So maybe there is something to that.
let me float one I have been thinking about a lot recently because of how well the Yankees, Rangers, Cardinals and Braves have played despite a spate of key injuries: When teams try to speed up the contention process by injecting stars, they fail to recognize that there is no way to accelerate what too simplistically has been called chemistry over the years. I think it is more about culture; about having a steady core, philosophy, self-assurance and leadership that flows from the top down — from the front office to the clubhouse — and stays intact year after year.
“I know the sabremetric community scoffs at the idea or notion that people ‘know how to win,’ ” an AL executive said. “I get their snickering and sometimes it is overused, but that doesn’t mean it does not exist, it just means it is overused. I think there is something to having players, leadership and a philosophy that is set up not to panic. I am not sure how it is created, my best guess is through continuity — the more people are around each other, work together, play together, etc., the more trust is built
I don't know as if I agree with this article, but it is interesting that many of the teams that were the big "winners" of free agency are struggling right now. I would fall into the category of people who scoff at chemistry, but there is a reason that the Cards are able to field a winner consistently with a payroll typically below the Cubs. So maybe there is something to that.