- Joined:
- Aug 17, 2011
- Posts:
- 43,000
- Liked Posts:
- 23,219
- Location:
- Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
Na, Nagy should have been replaced as play caller.You know Trubisky should’ve been benched.
Na, Nagy should have been replaced as play caller.You know Trubisky should’ve been benched.
Na, Nagy should have been replaced as play caller.
My post had nothing to do with that. I don't like Mitch. Foles gets creamed and throws picks yesterday. Last game was with a different Saints team and we also had fewer weapons this one without a deep threat even though Wims fucked up. He only got back there because they didn't respect him and they were right. Saints were taking away the short field where Foles does his work and it would only be worse with an immobile QB. There's a reason that Romo was talking about us going deep early.You’d think Trubisky would get lucky once and overcome a good defense and “bad play calling” but it just never happened. Not once in 4 years.
My post had nothing to do with that. I don't like Mitch. Foles gets creamed and throws picks yesterday. Last game was last game with a different Saints team and we also had fewer weapons this one without a deep threat even though Wims fucked up. He only got back there because they didn't respect him and they were right. Saints were taking away the short field where Foles does his work and it would only be worse with an immobile QB. There's a reason that Romo was talking about us going deep early.
How about football instead of bias.
This is accurate. Mitch and Nagy can be equally to blame. But if Nagy has such little faith in Mitch that he can't allow him to throw a pass with 1:50 on the clock and two timeouts left in the half, he needed to move to Foles right then and there. That's a coaches decision. He has an option and he chose not to use it and the only explanation is because he was afraid of how it would look. Nothing could look worse to me though than what he actually did, which was give up and do nothing.Listen, I don’t like Foles either but he gave the Bears the best chance to win yesterday and Nagy failed to make the correct coaching decision.
It’s not about bias, it’s about what gives the Bears the best chance to win that day.
That's just it. It didn't matter. Mitch had a 97 rating throwing to backups without that bomb. He missed a couple reads and was tentative on a run or 2 where Nick is dead, BFD. It was not on him. He was a lot more accurate than last week where he sucked.This is accurate. Mitch and Nagy can be equally to blame. But if Nagy has such little faith in Mitch that he can't allow him to throw a pass with 1:50 on the clock and two timeouts left in the half, he needed to move to Foles right then and there. That's a coaches decision. He has an option and he chose not to use it and the only explanation is because he was afraid of how it would look. Nothing could look worse to me though than what he actually did, which was give up and do nothing.
My post had nothing to do with that. I don't like Mitch. Foles gets creamed and throws picks yesterday. Last game was with a different Saints team and we also had fewer weapons this one without a deep threat even though Wims fucked up. He only got back there because they didn't respect him and they were right. Saints were taking away the short field where Foles does his work and it would only be worse with an immobile QB. There's a reason that Romo was talking about us going deep early.
To be fair, not sure Foles does any worse but I sure wouldn't expect much better. My issue is that this isn't about the QB and you're the one making it so.
How's Garoppolo doing? ?
How about football instead of bias.
Pretty awesome. I got hate from both a Mitch lover and hater in this post. How's that for unbiased, LOL.My post had nothing to do with that. I don't like Mitch. Foles gets creamed and throws picks yesterday. Last game was with a different Saints team and we also had fewer weapons this one without a deep threat even though Wims fucked up. He only got back there because they didn't respect him and they were right. Saints were taking away the short field where Foles does his work and it would only be worse with an immobile QB. There's a reason that Romo was talking about us going deep early.
To be fair, not sure Foles does any worse but I sure wouldn't expect much better. My issue is that this isn't about the QB and you're the one making it so.
How's Garoppolo doing? ?
How about football instead of bias.
Weren't the Saints without 2 of their best players that game?Foles already did better against the Saints. With a much worse offensive line.
And Trubisky does his work short, not Foles
Foles already did better against the Saints. With a much worse offensive line.
And Trubisky does his work short, not Foles
Nick has a 5.9 ypa. Mitch is 6.9. Intended air yards is 7.9 for Mitch and 8 .0 for Foles. Lots of jaundiced eye in this thread.Foles already did better against the Saints. With a much worse offensive line.
And Trubisky does his work short, not Foles
This is accurate. Mitch and Nagy can be equally to blame. But if Nagy has such little faith in Mitch that he can't allow him to throw a pass with 1:50 on the clock and two timeouts left in the half, he needed to move to Foles right then and there. That's a coaches decision. He has an option and he chose not to use it and the only explanation is because he was afraid of how it would look. Nothing could look worse to me though than what he actually did, which was give up and do nothing.
Yeah, but Nick Foles didnt give them the best chance to win. And you’re an idiot if you believe that.
I have no problem hanging the loss on the offense. I had really hoped they would stick with David Montgomerey and run him or short pass to him to control the clock. Defense did their part minus some missed tackles and several men down. I don't know you could ask for much more until they were gassed in the 3rd quarter. I definitely would not have assumed that the defense would be able to do that going in but the offensive game plan was complete crap and the fact that carries were pulled away from from DM to give to Patterson and even Nall is pathetic unless DM had some undisclosed injury.This game was entirely on the O. I'm not a big fan of Pagano but they caused 3 fumbles and held NO to 21 (they average 30). Saints had the ball for 38 fricking minutes and 74 plays because our O couldn't sustain anything. We had 239 total yards and under 200 without the last garbage drive where the Saints were already celebrating.
Weren't the Saints without 2 of their best players that game?
Yes..I disliked you...and I just did it againAre you disliking me after Mitch scored 3 points.
How the fuck can you dislike me.
You should be slurping my baby batter.
That shit we watched was an embarrassment.