How the Packers ‘screwed themselves’ with Aaron Rodgers contract

botfly10

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
32,899
Liked Posts:
26,043

How the Packers ‘screwed themselves’ with Aaron Rodgers contract


With the Green Bay Packers well over the salary cap to enter the offseason, an obvious solution would have been restructuring quarterback Aaron Rodgers’ contract.

In theory, it should have been a win-win proposition. The Packers could have created at least $13.6 million of critical breathing room to handle the COVID-reduced salary cap and possibly add players to a championship-caliber roster, while the “beautiful mystery” that was Rodgers’ future would have been solved to the quarterback’s liking, Bill Huber of SI.com's Packers Central reports.

Instead, Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst skipped a simple roster bonus-to-signing bonus conversion. Then, he renegotiated several other contracts to get beneath the cap. With each contract that was redone, it seemingly became apparent that flexibility at the game’s most important position was to the team’s liking. In 2022, based on the play of Rodgers and the development of Jordan Love, the team could go in one direction or the other.

Sensing his fate was completely out of his hands, despite producing one of the great seasons in NFL history, Rodgers attempted to take control over his future.

“They kind of screwed themselves,” a high-ranking NFL team executive said. “You play with fire, you get burned. He’s smart enough to know they did kind of hedge and basically say, ‘If he’s not playing well this season, we’re going to move on.’ He’s really trying to call their bluff. To them, why should we guarantee beyond 2021? But look at the situation. Because they didn’t do that, understanding who they’re dealing with, now they’re in a situation where the dude might not show up.”

A restructured contract presumably would have kept the Packers out of the predicament they’re in now, with organized team activities starting next week and the reigning MVP unlikely to be on the practice field.

The executive would have given Rodgers the restructured deal. His reason, however, goes beyond conventional wisdom. Given the importance of the position, Rodgers would be tradeable at almost any price. So, if Love made such a big jump in play this summer that the organization felt confident it would keep winning with him replacing Rodgers in 2022, the Packers could have still made the move next offseason.

“Denver’s so desperate for a quarterback, they don’t care about paying him $30 million guaranteed a year because they need a quarterback,” he said. “A quarterback’s contract is never not tradable unless they’re awful, especially a guy like Aaron.”

It would be costly cap-wise, to be sure, but the cache of draft picks could be used on a makeover of the roster.

That’s neither here nor there at this point, though. Rodgers’ deal wasn’t restructured and, because of it, the two sides appear to be at a standstill. Rodgers reportedly wants out of Green Bay while Gutekunst, coach Matt LaFleur and team President Mark Murphy have made it clear they want him in 2021 and “beyond.”

 

botfly10

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
32,899
Liked Posts:
26,043

Source: Rodgers-Packers Standoff ‘Realest Game of Poker’

“They kind of screwed themselves,” a high-ranking NFL team executive said. “You play with fire, you get burned.”

GREEN BAY, Wis. – With the Green Bay Packers well over the salary cap to enter the offseason, an obvious solution would have been restructuring quarterback Aaron Rodgers’ contract.

In theory, it should have been a win-win proposition. The Packers could have created at least $13.6 million of critical breathing room to handle the COVID-reduced salary cap and possibly add players to a championship-caliber roster, while the “beautiful mystery” that was Rodgers’ future would have been solved to the quarterback’s liking.

Instead, Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst skipped a simple roster bonus-to-signing bonus conversion. Then, he renegotiated several other contracts to get beneath the cap. With each contract that was redone, it seemingly became apparent that flexibility at the game’s most important position was to the team’s liking. In 2022, based on the play of Rodgers and the development of Jordan Love, the team could go in one direction or the other.

Sensing his fate was completely out of his hands, despite producing one of the great seasons in NFL history, Rodgers attempted to take control over his future.

“They kind of screwed themselves,” a high-ranking NFL team executive said. “You play with fire, you get burned. He’s smart enough to know they did kind of hedge and basically say, ‘If he’s not playing well this season, we’re going to move on.’ He’s really trying to call their bluff. To them, why should we guarantee beyond 2021? But look at the situation. Because they didn’t do that, understanding who they’re dealing with, now they’re in a situation where the dude might not show up.”

A restructured contract presumably would have kept the Packers out of the predicament they’re in now, with organized team activities starting next week and the reigning MVP unlikely to be on the practice field.

The executive would have given Rodgers the restructured deal. His reason, however, goes beyond conventional wisdom. Given the importance of the position, Rodgers would be tradeable at almost any price. So, if Love made such a big jump in play this summer that the organization felt confident it would keep winning with him replacing Rodgers in 2022, the Packers could have still made the move next offseason.

“Denver’s so desperate for a quarterback, they don’t care about paying him $30 million guaranteed a year because they need a quarterback,” he said. “A quarterback’s contract is never not tradable unless they’re awful, especially a guy like Aaron.”

It would be costly cap-wise, to be sure, but the cache of draft picks could be used on a makeover of the roster.

That’s neither here nor there at this point, though. Rodgers’ deal wasn’t restructured and, because of it, the two sides appear to be at a standstill. Rodgers reportedly wants out of Green Bay while Gutekunst, coach Matt LaFleur and team President Mark Murphy have made it clear they want him in 2021 and “beyond.”

The executive, who has general manager aspirations, has thought through how he’d handle the crisis.

“If you get to the point where he’s like, ‘Listen, I’m not coming in regardless. I don’t care what you do. You guys can fire everyone. I just don’t want to be there. I’m not showing up.’ If it gets to that point that the guy doesn’t want to be there, I’m of the mind-set that if you don’t want to be there, OK, we’ll move on,” he said.

“It’s extremely different when you’re talking about your franchise quarterback. That’s what makes this unique. In any other case, if he really pushes, there’s a breaking point where, ‘If you don’t want to be a part of what we’re doing, maybe it just isn’t a good fit.’ The tough part for Gutey is, regardless of what Mark Murphy or any of the people he reports to says, I don’t know if he’ll ever truly have a commitment from the entire group. You need a fully committed organization to say, ‘We’re moving on from Aaron. These are the ramifications, short term and long term, and we’re willing to do this for the health of the organization.’ If he moves on, they’re going to suck – or definitely not be as good unless he quickly pivots and brings in a competent vet from somewhere else. If that’s the case, they’re not going to be good and he’s probably going to get fired. So, that’s what makes this a little tough to move on, which probably forces him to dig his heels in and make Aaron show up.”

Of course, Rodgers doesn’t have to show up. He could threaten to retire, in which case the Packers not only wouldn’t have their quarterback but they wouldn’t get a blockbuster batch of picks and/or players via a trade.

So, in the end, who will blink first?

“This is like the realest game of poker,” the executive said. “He’s all in and he’s trying to make you go all in. You’re either going to push all your chips in and say, ‘I’m all in’ and see if you call his bluff. Based on what I know, I would dig in and make him show up.”

 

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
43,365
Liked Posts:
23,604
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
If Rodgers want out, he should show up to closed practices seemingly in poor shape and throw a bunch of dirt balls and picks, asked to have his shoulder iced on the sidelines.
 

Bust

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 5, 2020
Posts:
9,549
Liked Posts:
4,298
If you think about it most of the original teams couldn't wait to unload the player and contract

Eagles and Wentz
Rams and Goff
Texans will be soon with Watson
and your packers...
 

Canth

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 23, 2016
Posts:
3,769
Liked Posts:
5,349
It will be interesting to see if there is any more trade chatter next week once the post June 1 cap stuff comes into play. Did the Packers change their OTA schedule at all? Ie, are they seeing anything in any sort of practice from Love right now that would play into that decision?

And as far as the Texans go, they may now want to try and dump Watson, but I doubt they get anything like they could have gotten for him back in Feb/Mar timeframe. With all those allegations and such an uncertain future, no one is going to give up the crazy amount of draft capital that was previously discussed until there is some resolution to all that.
 
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
6,186
Liked Posts:
2,570
Location:
New York State(sucks)
I thought I saw a report that Vegas was in on the Rodgers sweepstakes. That is if there really is a Rodgers sweepstakes to begin with.

I would love it if Rodgers ended up in Vegas. That would be a potential huge step towards my dream of a Bears vs Raiders Superbowl.
 

botfly10

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
32,899
Liked Posts:
26,043
this shit makes a pretty compelling argument that whichever way the packers want to handle Rodgers, keep him or trade him, they fucked it up royally

fuckin hilarious
 

Ej63090

Anti-Exultant Cruise Dire
Joined:
Dec 6, 2014
Posts:
2,095
Liked Posts:
995
How many teams changed their starting QB this off-season? Has to be one of the most dynamic if both Rodgers and Watson move.

-Bears
-Lions
-Rams
-Colts
-Saints
-Panthers
-Broncos
-Jets
-Jags
-WFT
 

Midway Fields

CCS Quarterback Guru
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
8,258
Liked Posts:
6,005
Location:
Hometown Jimmy
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
How many teams changed their starting QB this off-season? Has to be one of the most dynamic if both Rodgers and Watson move.

-Bears
-Lions
-Rams
-Colts
-Saints
-Panthers
-Broncos
-Jets
-Jags
-WFT
Bridgewater is not starting week1 for the Broncos.
 

Milky

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
3,372
Liked Posts:
3,226
How many teams changed their starting QB this off-season? Has to be one of the most dynamic if both Rodgers and Watson move.

-Bears
-Lions
-Rams
-Colts
-Saints
-Panthers
-Broncos
-Jets
-Jags
-WFT
Pats (eventually)
9ers (possibly/eventually
Dolphins (sort of)
Eagles (sort of)

Damn near half the league will have a different starter at some point this season compared to last.
 

WindyCity

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Dec 12, 2011
Posts:
30,816
Liked Posts:
35,414
I don’t think they can trade him.

The question becomes how much of an A hole is he going to be while playing for them this season.
 

JoJoBoxer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
12,366
Liked Posts:
7,599
If Rodgers want out, he should show up to closed practices seemingly in poor shape and throw a bunch of dirt balls and picks, asked to have his shoulder iced on the sidelines.
"Bring in a competent vet from somewhere else" sure sounds like Foles.

Pace will have replaced all draft picks lost for Fields by the trade deadline.
 

Visionman

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 28, 2017
Posts:
7,995
Liked Posts:
4,723
That “anonymous NFL Executive” quoted in the article doesn’t have a clue how the salary cap and trades work.

If GB had converted that money into a signing bonus, it would be GB that would have to take that extra cap hit in a trade, not the other team. Not restructuring makes him more tradeable, at least for GB...
 

Britbuffguy

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 29, 2017
Posts:
6,027
Liked Posts:
4,497
Location:
Madison, WI
I don’t think they can trade him.

The question becomes how much of an A hole is he going to be while playing for them this season.
Or going forward if they find a way to keep him around another 3 years. Thing with Favre, is they just got sick of his offseason bullshit. If they cave and let Rodgers win this summer, what will demand next offseason?

I think if Love showed any signs of being decent, they'd rid the team of the diva antics that troubled Favre's final years.
 

ThatGuyRyan

Dongbears is THE worst
Donator
Joined:
Nov 29, 2014
Posts:
16,712
Liked Posts:
17,159
Location:
Texas
this shit makes a pretty compelling argument that whichever way the packers want to handle Rodgers, keep him or trade him, they fucked it up royally

fuckin hilarious
That's all I care about, they have a goon running the franchise now and I love it.
 

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
43,365
Liked Posts:
23,604
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
It will be interesting to see if there is any more trade chatter next week once the post June 1 cap stuff comes into play. Did the Packers change their OTA schedule at all? Ie, are they seeing anything in any sort of practice from Love right now that would play into that decision?

And as far as the Texans go, they may now want to try and dump Watson, but I doubt they get anything like they could have gotten for him back in Feb/Mar timeframe. With all those allegations and such an uncertain future, no one is going to give up the crazy amount of draft capital that was previously discussed until there is some resolution to all that.
They'll keep Watson until there's a determination on his fate and try to get out of that guaranteed money due to a breach in the conduct clause.
 

Nail Polish

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
27,693
Liked Posts:
10,461


"Rodgers has a $500,000 workout bonus in his contract, but his absence on Monday suggests he’s fine foregoing it while he remains at an impasse with the team about his future."
 

DrGonzo

Dump VJJ
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
9,512
Liked Posts:
5,408
Location:
Albuquerque, NM
“A quarterback’s contract is never not tradable unless they’re awful..."

Paging Matt Ryan -
 

botfly10

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
32,899
Liked Posts:
26,043
That “anonymous NFL Executive” quoted in the article doesn’t have a clue how the salary cap and trades work.

If GB had converted that money into a signing bonus, it would be GB that would have to take that extra cap hit in a trade, not the other team. Not restructuring makes him more tradeable, at least for GB...

I think you missed the point he was making
 

Top