How to fix the Catch "Rule"

ZenBear34

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 28, 2012
Posts:
4,379
Liked Posts:
3,749
Enough with the nonsense. A catch should be defined as possession with two feet down in bounds. End of story. None of this completing the process or football move b.s.

Stop leaving it up to interpretation.
 

botfly10

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
32,895
Liked Posts:
26,027
Seems simple enough to me.

What the fuck is the deal with the football move anyway? What is even the point of that?
 

Monsieur Tirets

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 8, 2012
Posts:
8,682
Liked Posts:
4,309
the rules are fine really, its just that they flip flop in regards to how they interpret said rules.

its really quite simple... hold onto the fucking ball. case closed. you take it out of the refs hands completely that way.
 

ZenBear34

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 28, 2012
Posts:
4,379
Liked Posts:
3,749
Seems simple enough to me.

What the fuck is the deal with the football move anyway? What is even the point of that?

I have no idea, and it seems to change week to week and ref to ref. Two feet/knee down in bounds and its a catch. If that happens and the the receiver drops it, its a fumble.
 

ZenBear34

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 28, 2012
Posts:
4,379
Liked Posts:
3,749
the rules are fine really, its just that they flip flop in regards to how they interpret said rules.

its really quite simple... hold onto the fucking ball. case closed.

No, they're not. That's why there's room to interpret. A rule is a rule. If there's an interpretive quality its a guideline.
 

Top