Bearshomer
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,517
- Liked Posts:
- 1,503
If Cutler was consistently in the range of Rivers, Romo, Ryan, and Stafford in terms of his play, how good would the Bears have been?
If he hypothetically were on that level, we would have had a legitimate chance to win the Super Bowl between 2010-2012 (mainly 2010-2011), when we our defenses ranged from good enough to great.
Our defense was pretty bad in the last few years with Cutler, so I doubt we would have made much noise, even if he were a top 10 QB.
If Cutler performed better the Bears win the SB 2010. Those god-awful Mel Tucker defenses never exist because Lovie doesn't get fired & the Bears are probably mainstays in the play-offs. Hard to guess beyond that because I can think of at least one Cutler injury that doesn't happen because he doesn't throw the pick & get hurt chasing it down.
If we where paying Cutler.. then we wouldn't of payed MackCutler with this defense would have been fun.
Cutler with this defense would have been fun.
Cutler had 7 offenses to learn in 8 seasons. The only thing I wonder is he had 1 only to master how good would he have been? As to OPs question ---- SBs. We had everything but a QB some years.
Other Qb's went thru different offenses and still performed. That's why they're paid millions. Plus....jay got those OC's & coaches fired. Remember? jay couldn't mesh with them so they were fired. Remember?