- Joined:
- May 10, 2010
- Posts:
- 11,225
- Liked Posts:
- 788
"I'm about 60% positive the Cubs will either sign Pujols or Fielder."
What the hell does that even mean? As opposed to 50% or 70%? C'mon, that's as ridic statement as anybody can make.
As for Fielder, it'll take a lot more then 7 years, $110 million as you posted. You're roughly about $25 million below of what the start up talk will be, and then it just depends how well his agent works the interested teams and how many interested teams there will be.
"I'm about 60% positive the Cubs will either sign Pujols or Fielder."
What the hell does that even mean? As opposed to 50% or 70%? C'mon, that's as ridic statement as anybody can make.
As for Fielder, it'll take a lot more then 7 years, $110 million as you posted. You're roughly about $25 million below of what the start up talk will be, and then it just depends how well his agent works the interested teams and how many interested teams there will be.
Didn't Gonzo sign an extension?
While we probably have a better chance at Fielder....I doubt we get either
I hope Pena hits .300, 45 HR's and 130 RBI's and we don't need to worry about it
I hope Pena hits .300, 45 HR's and 130 RBI's and we don't need to worry about it
I hope Pena hits .300, 45 HR's and 130 RBI's and we don't need to worry about it
He won't. Steroid era is over.
To get the fat contract we'd be dumb enough to give him..
--
I do like Pena. I just don't think he can do it top notch every year.
Won't get anywhere near .300.