jc456
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,547
- Liked Posts:
- 825
Sure they are, they only have drew brees where the vikings have...Matt Castle and Christian Ponder. You know those HOFers.Are the Saints comparable to the Vikings?
Sure they are, they only have drew brees where the vikings have...Matt Castle and Christian Ponder. You know those HOFers.Are the Saints comparable to the Vikings?
No one wants to address McCown's 2-11 third down performance against the Vikings.
I picked the team that is now 9-4, where a team McCown lost to was 2 -8 and 1. And then beat the Cowboys with a worse defense than the 2-8 and 1 team. And the defense that gave up 328 yards to Calvin Johnson. At home.
200 yards rushing by Adrian Peterson?
Sure they are, they only have drew brees where the vikings have...Matt Castle and Christian Ponder. You know those HOFers.
Or was it Cutler?
So a Cutler loss is on Cutler and McCown loss is on the D. Nice!
How many points did McCown put up on the #29 ranked D in the league? Oh, and like the other poster, so a Cutler loss is only on him and a McCown loss is on the D. LOFL200 yards rushing by Adrian Peterson?
For gaudy pass numbers and not scoring more than 23 points...yes
McCown threw for 355 yards, completed 64% of his passes, 2 TD's, 0 Int's against Minnesota...meanwhile the defense gave up 246 yards rushing to Minnesota, 211 of them to AP, a 6.2 yard/rush against our defense. So where is any of this loss on McCown?
How many points did McCown put up on the #29 ranked D in the league? Oh, and like the other poster, so a Cutler loss is only on him and a McCown loss is on the D. LOFL
If you have Matt Forte, Brandon Marshall, Alshon Jeffery, and company on your offense, you absolutely HAVE to score more than 20 on the Vikings.
Don't get me wrong, it's a great story, and I'd rather see them win than lose.
I feel bad for the McCown supporters. There's no way they can win the argument. Even if Cutler walks, McCown is still somebody's backup. Still, they try to argue why a 35+ McCown is some great option for the future. It's sad they are that football stupid.
2-11 on third down. When it matters most.
2-11 on third down. When it matters most.
So what was your point then with the porous D? Don't they play for both QBs? So McCown did his job well. I can say that. I'm not bashing McCown. I'm just saying the HC made a decision and we should all except his decision and stop bad mouthing the starting QB that was 4 and 4 when he got hurt.where did I say any of that? I have been the most vocal on here about how fucking dumb it is to attribute wins/losses to a qb because this is a team game...try again
Are the Saints comparable to the Vikings?
Not to take away from McCown's play, but this says a lot about the HC who put him in a position to play that well.
You do know the Bears historically play bad at the Metrodump...correct?
2-11 on third down. When it matters most.
How can he when he isn't playing? And I thought you weren't talking about QBs. Nice.So why isn't the more talented Cutler outplaying the backup?