Michael Redd, & the Chicago Bulls...Does It Mix? (Article)

Chi-Town Brahma

New member
Joined:
Jun 2, 2010
Posts:
2,376
Liked Posts:
264
Location:
1407 Graymalkin Lane
DISCLAIMER: It's a Bleacher Report article. Which means nothing, but I felt it should be discussed for the hell of it.

Is Michael Redd the Main Free Agent Target
for the Chicago Bulls?

05-Michael-Redd_thumb.jpg


This summer, Chicago Bulls fans can expect any front office activity to revolve around three words that describe the philosophy of Gar Forman.

Cheap. Conservative. Unimaginative.

Dwight Howard is making overtures that he is not signing an extension with the Orlando Magic. The Bulls possess the young players (Omer Asik, Taj Gibson, Joakim Noah, etc.) and the draft picks (No. 28 and No. 30 this year, plus a future lottery pick from Charlotte) to swing a trade for a viable shooting guard, and the Bulls front office is planning to consider some very high-risk, high-reward, low-compensation free agents.

At the top of their list? Milwaukee Bucks SG Michael Redd—aka The Wounded Deer.

Where has Mr. Redd, the consummate sharpshooter, been for the past three years?

He's been making an annual salary of $18 million while sitting in the best seats the Bucks can offer—right at the end of the bench. His injuries have kept him on the shelf, but he is reportedly healthy and the Bulls are ready to pounce.

Where have we heard this story before? The Bulls sign an aging, injury prone player as a fix to errors made in the past.

Can you say Carlos Boozer?

The only difference with Booz was that the Bulls had to pony up $80 million to gain his services as a bench player who will be on the annual DNP list.

Michael Redd is attractive to the Bulls for two reasons:

1. When healthy, Redd has never shot less than 44 percent from the field. He is an automatic 15-point scorer the moment he steps on the floor.

2. He will come cheap. Probably in the $3 million-$4 million range and won't cost the Bulls any of their "beloved" Bench Mob or draft picks.

Redd doesn't play defense. He does provide another "coach" on the floor and a positive influence in the locker room.

Of course, most of the time he is wearing "street clothes" in the locker room.


Source: Is Michael Redd the Main Free Agent Target for the Chicago Bulls? | Bleacher Report



Discuss..
 

Crystallas

Three if by air
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
20,014
Liked Posts:
9,558
Location:
Next to the beef gristle mill
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
Throwing darts at a dartboard, are we BR? :D
 

BigP50

04-21-2012
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
7,856
Liked Posts:
548
Location:
Lincoln, Nebraska
If he was healthy I would love to have him.
 

Chi-Town Brahma

New member
Joined:
Jun 2, 2010
Posts:
2,376
Liked Posts:
264
Location:
1407 Graymalkin Lane
If he was healthy I would love to have him.

Won't lie...that would be a great scenario IF he was healthy enough he would be an under-the-radar type of steal in the off-season.

I just doubt he would be any healthy than Boozer. Actually....he is a lot more of a liability than Boozer when it comes to injuries. Redd would still be a decent addition regardless.

It's a fact the Bucks fans would hate to see him (1) on the Bulls (2) Healthy & playing on the Bulls. :lol:
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,617
Liked Posts:
7,414
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
As a bench player on like a 3 million dollar salary, I can see it. Imo he wouldn't be much better than Kyle Korver. He can create his own shot though, so he's like a homeless man's Ray Allen sort of. Or maybe Korver with added ball handling. xD But honestly, I doubt we even look at him.
 

BNB

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 9, 2011
Posts:
15,598
Liked Posts:
8,384
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  2. Oakland Raiders
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
If he was healthy and a little younger, I would love to have Redd.

Now I doubt he can stay healthy for more than a month. So I'll pass on him.
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,617
Liked Posts:
7,414
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
If he was healthy and a little younger, I would love to have Redd.

Now I doubt he can stay healthy for more than a month. So I'll pass on him.

I think he'd pull a Boozer and injure himself before training camp. xD
 

Scoot26

Administrator
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
41,336
Liked Posts:
28,436
Redd is a shell of his former shelf. Really not worth it in my opinion.
 

Chicagolove

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 28, 2010
Posts:
215
Liked Posts:
36
If this were 06-07 Redd, then **** yes.
Now? Not too sure. He's aging and injuries have taken their toll on him.
 

james k

New member
Joined:
Apr 27, 2011
Posts:
59
Liked Posts:
14
Location:
midwest
I wouldn't mind seeing him as a reserve to add more shooting to a Bulls squad which relies way too much on Korver's streaky tendencies. The way that I see it, if Peja could catch on with Dallas and be somewhat effective in a pinch, why wouldn't the Bulls look into a similar situation in Redd--he should come cheap if they wanted to sign him. If he doesn't come cheap, then the FO won't waste their time on him.
 

RamiTheBullsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
9,505
Liked Posts:
1,733
Redd probably doesn't have anything left to give. This is a lot like asking if the Bulls should get a shorter, injury-prone Peja Stojakovic.
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Michael Redd doesn't help the Bulls beat Miami.
 

Top