Nick Foles would be better for us with this style of play

Status
Not open for further replies.

mbison

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 20, 2012
Posts:
864
Liked Posts:
973
Location:
Oak Park
Now that we are a run first team and our oline is protecting better. I believe Nick Foles would be a better option for us in the playoffs because 1. He can stretch the field and 2. I can trust him more with the football. What do you guys think?
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
36,418
Liked Posts:
33,366
Location:
Cumming
Now that we are a run first team and our oline is protecting better. I believe Nick Foles would be a better option for us in the playoffs because 1. He can stretch the field and 2. I can trust him more with the football. What do you guys think?

No. End thread and take a vacation
 

dweebs19

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 16, 2011
Posts:
9,049
Liked Posts:
5,404
we're back on this Nick Foles thing? didn't we just see Foles in this type of playcalling? You know what, with this type of playcalling, the Bears will lose with Mitch anyway...so why not? put Foles back in there. Maybe he has one more magic playoff ride
 

Hbkrusso

Objective Fanboy
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
17,641
Liked Posts:
11,801
Location:
wv
Its super obvious mitch is the issue ask around here and considering all foles success as a bear he certainly shouldnt lose his jerrb cause he got hurt
Lets give the people what they want
Plus it will get Foles ready for next season
 

Chicago Staleys

Realist
Joined:
Sep 24, 2012
Posts:
13,108
Liked Posts:
8,504
You know nothing about football. Sorry. Have you even watched the offensive scheme since Foles was benched?
 

legendxofxlink

Whistle Dixie
Joined:
Apr 25, 2014
Posts:
10,761
Liked Posts:
10,854
Location:
Tennessee
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nashville Predators
  1. ETSU Buccaneers
  2. Tennessee Volunteers
Absolutely not, save foles for your 2021 starting QB season.
 

mbison

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 20, 2012
Posts:
864
Liked Posts:
973
Location:
Oak Park
we're back on this Nick Foles thing? didn't we just see Foles in this type of playcalling? You know what, with this type of playcalling, the Bears will lose with Mitch anyway...so why not? put Foles back in there. Maybe he has one more magic playoff ride

We Never saw Foles with this type of play with this team. Montgomery barely had 50 yards a game rushing
 

dweebs19

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 16, 2011
Posts:
9,049
Liked Posts:
5,404
We Never saw Foles with this type of play with this team. Montgomery barely had 50 yards a game rushing
if Nagy is going to call the plays anyway, I say go for it. If Lazor calls the plays, I'd rather see Mitch. Foles almost beat the Saints last time.
 

Bearfanfromnewjersey

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
4,856
Liked Posts:
2,306
Now that we are a run first team and our oline is protecting better. I believe Nick Foles would be a better option for us in the playoffs because 1. He can stretch the field and 2. I can trust him more with the football. What do you guys think?

I think you are as dumb as a box of rocks
 

tcmtrinity

Active member
Joined:
Dec 7, 2020
Posts:
855
Liked Posts:
443
I like the way you think. We need your kind in Springfield. But more in DC.
 

sevvy

Get rich, or try dying
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
13,573
Liked Posts:
19,538
Location:
Charlotte, NC
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
Yikes.
 

JesusHalasChrist

N.eg it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Donator
Joined:
May 18, 2014
Posts:
9,983
Liked Posts:
12,075
Location:
murica
Fuck it. Let's try All Day Bray.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top