Tall Glass Of Jeffery
New member
- Joined:
- Sep 19, 2014
- Posts:
- 1,158
- Liked Posts:
- 331
- Location:
- Las Vegas
Khalil Mack is an example of a player that ticked all the boxes except that elite level competition.
Production - 100 tackles, 18.5 for loss, 10.5 sacks, 3 picks and 7 pds in 13 games his senior year.
Senior Bowl - DNP. Many thought this might hurt his stock. It didn't.
Combine - Blew it up. One of the top performers in the 40, vertical jump, broad jump and shuttle.
Off Field - Clean. No arrests, drugs or items that made his team look bad.
As for Spence:
Production - 63 tackles, 22.5 for loss, 11.5 sacks, 0 picks and 0 pds in 11 games his senior year.
Senior Bowl - Blew it up. Consistently won all week and had a good bowl game.
Combine - TBD
Off Field - Lied about having trace elements of Ecstasy, a hard drug, in his blood. Was later admitted to a treatment center (i.e. rehab) and was then cut by Ohio State.
Is Spence as good at Mack? I'm unsure. From watching some of Spence's old tape and remembering Mack as the prospect they are both similar at the point of attack, but Mack was extremely good in space. He could play any LB spot in any system whereas Spence seemed at his best going forward.
It's an interesting comparison, but I think there are some tangible differences between the two prospects.
I remember Mack getting a lot of Von Miller comparisons because they both could do it all. Miller was also exceptional in space, which was on display this past Superbowl when he would cover RBs/TEs step for step.
Only comparison I'm using is the small school comparison...not comparing them as players. I'm just saying I don't think him playing at a small school should hurt his stock and I've yet to here that label for him.