I've read a lot of bad articles (mostly on Bleacher Report) and I have no problem with parenthetical comments (I use them myself sometimes) but I think Kelly got a little carried away (They are all over the place!).
You say he's a Bulls fan but the article reads like it was written by a Spurs fan who is trying to make excuses for his favorite team losing.
The article starts with a bad headline ("streets ahead?" I'm not even sure what that expression means.), poses the question, "Did the Spurs take the night off?" and then never argues either side to answer it.
What does he mean by this: "Rose was clearly the catalyst, shooting 18-28 and tossing in a couple of great (for him) dimes in transition on his way to eight assists." Is he saying that those shots would be routine for most players, but they were a great accomplishment for him?
... At least there were no spelling or punctuation errors. Good for him.
