Washington
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
- Posts:
- 4,347
- Liked Posts:
- 3,545
Pace also had to hit on his day 3 picks because he was so horrendous with his day 2 picks. I would not use Pace as any sort of drafting template.
In his first draft, Poles hit on Braxton in the 5th. Kramer has provided OL depth from the 6th.
In his 2nd draft, Roschon in the 4th is still on the roster as RB depth and Terrell Smith has been good at CB from the 5th.
In his 3rd draft, he took a punter and it's too early to say what they have in Booker.
And in this latest draft, it's obviously way too early to really say anything about any of them.
IMO, Poles is basically batting about average on day 3 picks of what should be reasonable expectations of a GM. He is generally drafting traits at that point and seeing if they can develop into anything. I think that is a valid approach. Part of the problem too is that because he picked the wrong initial HC and hence coaching staff, the development side has been stunted, imo.
It will be very interesting to see with the new coaching staff if they can develop guys better and get more out of all the picks, days 2 and 3 especially. I would hope so, but until it happens, that is going to be a big question mark.
Trust me when I say I was not a fan of Pace but I just used a few of his examples. It was not to compare Pace to Poles.
The point I was trying to make was in regard to throwing away a pick for a year rental when you are a shitty team. You actually showed players and reasons why using that draft pick would be better than in essence throwing it away. I would rather have the punter with that pick versus having nobody after the year of the 1 year rental.