Rise
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 8,208
- Liked Posts:
- 7,923
- Location:
- Mom's Basement
I don't understand why they were so in love with Bisaccia and risked losing their current STs coach over a guy who's units were comparable. Obviously Bisaccia was going to be a really hot name with all of the coaching turnover and him helping the Raiders get to the playoffs. The reward didn't seem worth the risk. With a franchise that's undergoing so much change at every single level, you would have hoped there could have been some stability. Losing your best coach when you didn't need to is dumb.
The Giants coach is better overall ST coach than all of them. That said Bisaccia had more value than just a ST coach.
Why they hired this guy who is clearly the worst option of the 4, is a mystery. It’s what the Bears do though, these little moves add up to being the difference and why they have only one constant, and it’s losing.