OT: Stamkos Scores 60 Goals On Last Day Of Season.

Status
Not open for further replies.

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Re: OT: Stamkos Scores 57 And 58: Will He Hit 60?

Yea he probably will

Sent Via Tapatalk On DROID RAZR MAXX
 
HawkWriter

HawkWriter

New member
Joined:
Aug 18, 2011
Posts:
3,491
Liked Posts:
1,341
DewsSox79 said:
its all because of martin st louis. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Once again, reading comprehension...have at it anytime you choose. Otherwise, your posts will continue to be meaningless shots at something that doesn't exist.
 

Captain Iago

Giver of Occular Proof
Donator
Joined:
May 24, 2010
Posts:
5,905
Liked Posts:
1,974
Scoring is down overall, though, right?

Good for him.
 
Everyday I'm Byfuglien

Everyday I'm Byfuglien

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Oct 8, 2010
Posts:
3,194
Liked Posts:
1,463
Just did a quick search to confirm what I posted. Holy smokes...

Goals.jpg


Source: Boylen: Power plays, not goal scoring, down in NHL - Yahoo! Sports

I knew penalties were down, but I didn't know it was quite that drastic.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
HawkWriter said:
Once again, reading comprehension...have at it anytime you choose. Otherwise, your posts will continue to be meaningless shots at something that doesn't exist.
Click to expand...

HawkWriter said:
That's fine, that is your opinion.

As I said before...in MVP talk I think Malkin improves his teammate a lot more than Stamkos does with his, and I think St.Louis is what really helps Stamkos out big time.

My opinion, I backed it up with thought, opinion, some stats, and not smiley faces.
Click to expand...

HawkWriter said:
I like Malkin for it because the Pens have had a whole lot of injuries to deal with. Crosby, Letang, others. Without Malkin I think that team is in deep shit.

I think the Lightning stick around where they are because I think St. Louis is a big part of what motors that team. Mike Babcock was asked last year about containing Stamkos and he made a comment that it is St. Louis that makes that team run and is the one they have to be worried about.

Malkin makes things happen on his own, while Stamkos is a complete snipe show that finds the soft spot in the ice...but he usually has to have someone dish him the puck. Really nothing wrong with that overall except if talking MVP, but I really do think that without St. Louis you see Stamkos dip in goals because Stamkos isn't the type of guy that has the puck on his stick for very long in a game. St. Louis is one of the most underrated players in the NHL in my eyes, doesn't get the credit he deserves.

I will also say that Malkin seems to elevate his teammates more so than Stamkos does.

Just my opinion based on what I have seen.
Click to expand...

discredit his numbers because of St Louis. Its right there in your posts.

I think 60 goals helps out a team no?

I wonder what his "dip in goals" would actually be at if there was no st louis. 50? :rolleyes:
 
DMelt36

DMelt36

Bolland > You
Joined:
May 27, 2010
Posts:
13,969
Liked Posts:
8,434
Stamkos is just too good. Love watching the kid play.

I think it's time to invest in my first non-Blackhawks hockey sweater.
 
HawkWriter

HawkWriter

New member
Joined:
Aug 18, 2011
Posts:
3,491
Liked Posts:
1,341
DewsSox79 said:
discredit his numbers because of St Louis. Its right there in your posts.

I think 60 goals helps out a team no?

I wonder what his "dip in goals" would actually be at if there was no st louis. 50? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I still stand by what you quoted, however what you are saying that I "say" is completely different than my quotes. Never once did I say it was all because of St. Louis or that he would be nothing without him, I always recognize the talent he is but I believe people don't recognize the talent St. Louis is.

I do believe Stamkos would dip without St. Louis, but I always note that Stamkos is an amazing talent and easily top 10 in the league.

Stamkos is the type of player that needs someone to feed him the puck. He finds the soft areas and then is a snipe show. He needs someone like St. Louis to help him out because he isn't the type of guy to carry a play or carry the puck. Flat out, that is what I see in his game. Especially when talking MVP, which is what all those quotes were from...I have said Malkin improves his teammates more than a Stamkos does to his.
 
Last edited:

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
HawkWriter said:
I still stand by what you quoted, however what you are saying that I "say" is completely different than my quotes. Never once did I say it was all because of St. Louis or that he would be nothing without him, I always recognize the talent he is but I believe people don't recognize the talent St. Louis is.

I do believe Stamkos would dip without St. Louis, but I always note that Stamkos is an amazing talent and easily top 10 in the league.

Stamkos is the type of player that needs someone to feed him the puck. He finds the soft areas and then is a snipe show. He needs someone like St. Louis to help him out because he isn't the type of guy to carry a play or carry the puck. Flat out, that is what I see in his game. Especially when talking MVP, which is what all those quotes were from...I have said Malkin improves his teammates more than a Stamkos does to his.
Click to expand...

So again lets minus out St Louis and put him on another team, a team that doesnt have the St Louis type player, he still scores 45-50 goals without question. Top 10, more like top 5/6.
 
HawkWriter

HawkWriter

New member
Joined:
Aug 18, 2011
Posts:
3,491
Liked Posts:
1,341
DewsSox79 said:
So again lets minus out St Louis and put him on another team, a team that doesnt have the St Louis type player, he still scores 45-50 goals without question. Top 10, more like top 5/6.
Click to expand...

Okay, so then you agree with me that he would dip in goals with out a St. Louis who helps out Stamkos big time. 10 - 15 goals is a pretty good sized dip. So basically you are arguing to just argue?

Also, I have been saying he is easily top 10...so saying more like 5/6 isn't that much off at all. I could probably make a case for him in the top 5, but he would be closer to the bottom of that for me.
 
TheChicagoFan

TheChicagoFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 15, 2010
Posts:
6,122
Liked Posts:
1,642
Location:
Misery
Stamkos is a beast. No question. He's a goalscorer. He's not the best player in the league though.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
HawkWriter said:
Okay, so then you agree with me that he would dip in goals with out a St. Louis who helps out Stamkos big time. 10 - 15 goals is a pretty good sized dip. So basically you are arguing to just argue?

Also, I have been saying he is easily top 10...so saying more like 5/6 isn't that much off at all. I could probably make a case for him in the top 5, but he would be closer to the bottom of that for me.
Click to expand...

If he still score 50 goals without a "st louis" he is still fucking amazing. The dip is not significant and does not make st louis god, im also sure that stamkos can make any playmaker much better.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
OT: Stamkos Scores 57 And 58: Will He Hit 60?

59.


Sent from a Pay Phone at 7/11 using Tapatalk
 
Uman85

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
What's the record for goals in a season?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

10,928members
95,600threads
4,530,678posts
408online users

Members online NOW

  • Member
  • Admin
  • Mod
  • Donor
  • HOF
Total: 408 (members: 36, guests: 372)

Staff online NOW

Top