Packers win over SF makes Bears game vs. NE less meaningful

Rory Sparrow

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
4,850
Liked Posts:
3,250
The Packers were kind of in a 'must-win' situation against the Niners last night...lose at home to a mediocre opponent, get your bye, then your next two games are against the Rams and Patriots? Ouch.

The good news for the Bears is that the Packers looked like a one-man show and in some ways the Packers defense getting shredded by CJ Beathard is just as bad as the Bears giving up 541 yards to Brock Osweiler's offense. The bad news is that the NFC North is now a total clusterfuck, and IMO it will remain that way for the next several weeks until the Bears hit the part of their schedule where they play the other divisional teams.

I think there is a big difference between the Bears being 4-1 and the Bears being 3-2. The combination of the Bears 'snatching defeat from the jaws of victory' against the Dolphins and the Packers benefiting from the fact that a) Richard Sherman is still in the NFL, b) the Niners thought the last drive of the game was a good time to matchup Sherman on Davante Adams, and c) Richard Sherman still thinks he is on the Seahawks and can get away with spinning WRs around 15 yards downfield, means that the Bears cannot simply sneak away with the division. If the Bears lose to the Patriots, then they are still essentially in the same position...fighting with all the other NFC North clubs for a postseason spot. It's highly possible that the Vikings and Lions win against AFC Least teams, the Bears lose to the Pats, and the Packers sit at home, making the new standings:

Vikings 4-2-1
Packers 3-2-1
Lions 3-3
Bears 3-3

The Lions would hold the tiebreaker over Chicago due to a better divisional record.

I think had the Bears won over Miami and the Packers lost, it would be seen as a two-horse race between the 4-1 Bears and the 3-2-1 Vikes, with the pressure on the Bears to beat NE to maintain their division lead. The dream scenario would be for the Bears to beat NE and hold a 2.5 game lead over the Vikings (5-1 vs. 3-3-1). Since that no longer exists, I think the Bears v. Pats game is just another non-divisional game on the schedule. Perhaps that is the completely opposite way to think about things, IDK.
 

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
43,293
Liked Posts:
23,536
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Why this game against a winning team was so important and was getting way too overlooked and dismissed by Bear fans. Gotta win the ones you're supposed to if you want to make the postseason.
 

Rory Sparrow

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
4,850
Liked Posts:
3,250
Why this game against a winning team was so important and was getting way too overlooked and dismissed by Bear fans. Gotta win the ones you're supposed to if you want to make the postseason.

That was always the knock on Lovie Smith..."He never beats good teams"...but he always beat the bad teams, which seemed to work out fairly well.
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
18,857
Liked Posts:
4,656
Too Early to tell, and most of this won't be decided until they are further into the divisional schedule as you mentioned. Isn't one of the tie breakers "common opponents"? I think the division is starting to shake out like i expected it would, with the exception that the Bears are a more serious contender now, after the Mack trade. Still think GB is a pretender, Bears have a decent chance at a WC spot, and the Lions have an outside shot. Still see the Vikes as the commanding favorite to win the division. Of course, any one key injury to any of these teams could really change things.
 

iueyedoc

Variant Also Negotiates
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
21,232
Liked Posts:
26,230
Location:
Mountains to Sea
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
That was always the knock on Lovie Smith..."He never beats good teams"...but he always beat the bad teams, which seemed to work out fairly well.
Bears fans version of fairly well is making the playoffs 3 of 9 yrs, a career record of 92-90, and 1 playoff appearance in 1 of his last 6 seasons. Lovie Smith is just the least toothless contestant in the Bears 30 year coaching version of the Miss W. Virginia beauty pageant.

Sorta sad what we have been beaten down to accept as good.
 
Last edited:

Mdbearz

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 9, 2014
Posts:
4,519
Liked Posts:
3,133
Location:
Harford County, MD
This makes my head hurt....

While I would love us to be 4-1, we are not, so no sense in trying to make sense of the playoff picture until we have more divisional games under our belt.

We have 3 Non-divisional games coming up, and we need to play each game as if it matters, because it does. Imagine if we beat the Pats and then lose to the Jets and Bills?

We can play the "what-if" game, but I think it is important to approach the Pats as a must win, even though it would be an upset if we do win.
 

Rory Sparrow

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
4,850
Liked Posts:
3,250
Bears fans version of fairly well is making the playoffs 3 of 9 yrs, a career record of 92-90, and 1 playoff appearance in 1 of his last 6 seasons. Lovie Smith is just the least toothless contestant in the Bears 30 year coaching version of the Miss W. Virginia beauty pageant.

Sorta sad what we have been beaten down to accept as good.

Lovie's record with Bears was 81-63, not 92-90. Not sure where you are getting your numbers.
 

bearmick

Captain Objectivity
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
37,894
Liked Posts:
41,320
The Packers might be a one man show, but that one man is better than the whole Bears team combined. I still think they'll win the division by a game over the Vikings.
 

BNB

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 9, 2011
Posts:
15,246
Liked Posts:
7,973
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  2. Oakland Raiders
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
FWIW - According to this site, if the Bears beat the Patriots, they have a ~46% chance of winning the division and a ~70% chance of making the playoffs.

If they lose, they have a ~32% chance of winning the division and ~53% chance of making the playoffs.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...yoff-picture.html#chi-ne-7=win&event=champion


I wish we could see some of their simulations historically to see how accurate it is. Obviously injuries can throw things off... but still fun to look at it.
 

WestCoastBearsFan

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 25, 2017
Posts:
17,088
Liked Posts:
11,480
My favorite teams
  1. Los Angeles Lakers
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Los Angeles Kings
  1. Clemson Tigers
GB doesn’t worry me. They will take 2 L’s against NE and the rams so they will fall even more behind in the standings. We just have to pray we some how beat New England and we have to at least split the series with Minnesota this year. Which doesn’t seem impossible but certainly won’t be easy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Penny Traitor

バカでも才能は一つ
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
11,556
Liked Posts:
15,452
Location:
Chicago
Lovie's record with Bears was 81-63, not 92-90. Not sure where you are getting your numbers.
92-90 is his NFL career record...so it includes a lot of Tampa Bay losses.

As to the OP...every win matters, but it is true that if the Bears are going to lose...these AFC match-ups are the time to get it out of your system.

(Although 0-4 would really suck)
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
18,857
Liked Posts:
4,656
FWIW - According to this site, if the Bears beat the Patriots, they have a ~46% chance of winning the division and a ~70% chance of making the playoffs.

If they lose, they have a ~32% chance of winning the division and ~53% chance of making the playoffs.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...yoff-picture.html#chi-ne-7=win&event=champion


I wish we could see some of their simulations historically to see how accurate it is. Obviously injuries can throw things off... but still fun to look at it.

This whole division will come down to injurys.
 

jonimus

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 27, 2011
Posts:
930
Liked Posts:
609
Yeah, I agree. The difference of being 9-7 vs 8-8 or 10-6 vs 9-7 is huge. Divisional games are obviously the most important but that's only if it comes down to a tie breaker. At the end of the year, that tie breaker would hold no ground if we 'just won one more game' against any team.

Gotta stick with the meatball mentality and just worry about the next game at this point.


This makes my head hurt....

While I would love us to be 4-1, we are not, so no sense in trying to make sense of the playoff picture until we have more divisional games under our belt.

We have 3 Non-divisional games coming up, and we need to play each game as if it matters, because it does. Imagine if we beat the Pats and then lose to the Jets and Bills?

We can play the "what-if" game, but I think it is important to approach the Pats as a must win, even though it would be an upset if we do win.
 

Midway Fields

CCS Quarterback Guru
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
8,256
Liked Posts:
6,005
Location:
Hometown Jimmy
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
The Packers might be a one man show, but that one man is better than the whole Bears team combined. I still think they'll win the division by a game over the Vikings.

Only if he learns to play defense at the same level.
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
18,857
Liked Posts:
4,656
GB doesn’t worry me. They will take 2 L’s against NE and the rams so they will fall even more behind in the standings. We just have to pray we some how beat New England and we have to at least split the series with Minnesota this year. Which doesn’t seem impossible but certainly won’t be easy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Until one of those things happen, you have to worry though. With the Bears luck, they will lose to NE but knock Brady out of the game in the 4th quarter. Then two weeks later, a GB team will beat a crippled NE team.
 

iueyedoc

Variant Also Negotiates
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
21,232
Liked Posts:
26,230
Location:
Mountains to Sea
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
92-90 is his NFL career record...so it includes a lot of Tampa Bay losses.

As to the OP...every win matters, but it is true that if the Bears are going to lose...these AFC match-ups are the time to get it out of your system.

(Although 0-4 would really suck)
Yep my bad. Looked at the wrong #'s. That said, 1 playoffs in his last 6 seasons with the Bears and 3 of 9 overall with a total of 3 playoff wins in 9 seasons. I don't think he needs to worry about get sized for a HOF jacket or even a HOReallyGood jacket.
 
Last edited:

WestCoastBearsFan

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 25, 2017
Posts:
17,088
Liked Posts:
11,480
My favorite teams
  1. Los Angeles Lakers
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Los Angeles Kings
  1. Clemson Tigers
Until one of those things happen, you have to worry though. With the Bears luck, they will lose to NE but knock Brady out of the game in the 4th quarter. Then two weeks later, a GB team will beat a crippled NE team.

I was thinking about it last night. Our defense is significantly better than KC and while our offense isn’t on par with KC it’s getting better each week. I definitely think it’s possible we beat New England.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Rory Sparrow

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
4,850
Liked Posts:
3,250
92-90 is his NFL career record...so it includes a lot of Tampa Bay losses.

So Bears fans were still upset with Lovie when he was losing at Tampa? Wow, I knew CCS had angst issues, but I didn't realize they were so pronounced. I can only imagine how the Illini's football struggles have put a damper on the Bears season for the fans.

John Fox's record was 141-130 with two Super Bowl appearances, so not sure why Bears fans wanted him fired.
 

Top