It's not that he's wrong here, he very well be right, it's this business of using past failures to predict the future. There is no direct correlation between past Cubs contenders and this one. No players, no coaches and no key FO personnel. In fact if you want to just look at the randomness of numbers the Cubs are way past due to have luck go their way. This team isn't built on luck though. I do agree with him in that the playoffs are a different beast though. The playoffs are about setting your best lineup, having depth for different matchups and being able to win in different ways and still they can be considered very random. Rose like to say things and, again, maybe he's right but he's not offering evidence he's just guessing and relying on old tropes. I'll just kinda place ol' Pete to the side for now and just keep watching the games and what this FO does down the stretch thank you.