Rogers is great, no doubt. But if I were a GB fan I'd be pretty disappointed that in spite of having two Hall of Fame QB's in a row, a span of 28 years, that between the two of them GB has only three Super Bowl appearances with 2 victories.
For comparison, in that same time span the Bears have had a carousel with a few decent/good (McMahon, Kramer, Miller, Cutler), but mostly bad (too many to list) QB's with none of them even remotely considered to be Hall of Fame caliber. And yet the Bears have two Super Bowl appearances with 1 victory. GB wins the comparison, but don't you think that logically there should be more separation between the teams in victories than ONE Super Bowl?
So yeah, GB has been blessed with great QB play for 28 years, but it certainly can be argued they should have accomplished more with those guys.