Puerto Rico Statehood election

TSD

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
5,014
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Plainfield, IL
Last vote was in 1998.



Apparently the big change here is that in previous votes, voters that went to the polls could basically opt out (select none of the above) which many did because they didn't understand what they were choosing. Now they dont have that option to select. This could be interesting, considering there are allegedly no republicans or democrats in Puerto Rico. Although, say Puerto Rico does vote statehood, I am going to guess which ever party in congress thinks it will go against them politically is going to try to block it.





[font=Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif][background=rgb(248, 245, 243)]The 2012 vote is different because it has two parts. The first question asks voters if they want to move away from Puerto Rico’s territorial status.[/background][/font]

[font=Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif][background=rgb(248, 245, 243)]The second part asks voters to choose three options other than remaining a territory: becoming a U.S. state, an independent country, or a freely associated nation with legal ties to the United States.[/background][/font]

[font=Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif][background=rgb(248, 245, 243)]Back in 1998, voters in Puerto Rico were given four options: statehood, independence, a commonwealth, or none of the above. The majority picked “none of the above” as an option.[/background][/font]
 

sth

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
2,851
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Billings, Montana
I think that the likely winner will be to stay with territorial status. Statehood might get some votes. I don't think independence will get any support. The US takes pretty good care of PR.
 

The Count Dante

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
2,745
Liked Posts:
0
My guess is PR wont become a state. I may be speaking out of my ass, but I recall the last time it went to vote, there was concern the Federal tax would crush PR.
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
We lose 5 infamy is release them but also lose 5 prestige if we do. They aren't rebellion yet so I say let them be.

(Inside joke to TSD)
 

TSD

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
5,014
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Plainfield, IL
My guess is PR wont become a state. I may be speaking out of my ass, but I recall the last time it went to vote, there was concern the Federal tax would crush PR.



From the article it seems most voters have no idea in hell what any of the options entails (hence the vast majority choosing "none of the above") in the previous vote, which included remaining a territory as an option, By that assumption, they dont want to be a territory, commonwealth, or independent or they dont know what it means.
 

TSD

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
5,014
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Plainfield, IL
We lose 5 infamy is release them but also lose 5 prestige if we do. They aren't rebellion yet so I say let them be.

(Inside joke to TSD)



Great Britain just got a free people casus belli on the United States.
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
Great Britain just got a free people casus belli on the United States.



Yeah but all their troops are in India so who gives a ****. Anyway the German-American Axis of Doom will crush Britain.
 

TSD

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
5,014
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Plainfield, IL
Yeah but all their troops are in India so who gives a ****. Anyway the German-American Axis of Doom will crush Britain.



Remember it is now the "peoples commonwealth of Britain".
 

TSD

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
5,014
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Plainfield, IL
Did it rebel again thought it was the Worker's Party or some shit?



workers commonwealth peoples commonwealth, same difference.
 

KMChechASS69r

New member
Joined:
Jul 26, 2012
Posts:
293
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Somewhere this side of sanity.
Yeah, we don't need them dumping their fucking Iguana problem on us either. Next thing they'd want is there own baseball stadium which would only drive up ticket costs cuz MLB teams will pass off the travel costs to the fans. Bri's right, we got enough states. AND, with that many poor people, well...
 

Larmer83

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
991
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Not far from 127th and Archer
Puerto Rican statehood...I could care less.



Puerto Rican bootyhood...Admit it as a state.



The smokin hot female ass in the USA will increase two fold if PR is admitted as a state. Unfortunately, this will not affect the balance of trade.



OK. So that's sexist. I don't care. But from a personal perspective, it's absolutely true.
 

KMChechASS69r

New member
Joined:
Jul 26, 2012
Posts:
293
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Somewhere this side of sanity.
Puerto Rican statehood...I could care less.



Puerto Rican bootyhood...Admit it as a state.



The smokin hot female ass in the USA will increase two fold if PR is admitted as a state. Unfortunately, this will not affect the balance of trade.



OK. So that's sexist. I don't care. But from a personal perspective, it's absolutely true.



PR pootytang! Love it. I'm sure I could find something I could trade for that!
 

bookjones

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
3,869
Liked Posts:
5
Location:
Uptown baby!
We have too many states now.



Who can say what too many states is though---statehood has always been an ever morphing American geo-socio-political experiment. When were were at 48 there were those who didn't see a point in adding 49 and 50 back in 1959.



I say bring it on PR! And in the event it must stay at 50 I'd do a Texas for Puerto Rico trade straight up in a heartbeat and not even think twice about it. Heh.
 

mikita's helmet

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
7,876
Liked Posts:
1,107
Location:
Anacortes, WA via Glenview, IL
I say bring it on PR! And in the event it must stay at 50 I'd do a Texas for Puerto Rico trade straight up in a heartbeat and not even think twice about it. Heh.



hell, yeah, though I'd like Austin to be like West Berlin.



Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens and at age 18 have to register for the draft.



So if IPuerto Ricans can die in our wars, if they want to be a state, they should be admitted
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
hell, yeah, though I'd like Austin to be like West Berlin.



Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens and at age 18 have to register for the draft.



So if IPuerto Ricans can die in our wars, if they want to be a state, they should be admitted



Can't argue with that logic at all.
 

bookjones

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
3,869
Liked Posts:
5
Location:
Uptown baby!
hell, yeah, though I'd like Austin to be like West Berlin.



Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens and at age 18 have to register for the draft.



So if IPuerto Ricans can die in our wars, if they want to be a state, they should be admitted



Austin is pretty damn sweet. True dat. Well you know how it is with TX, they're always lobbing secession threats into the atmosphere anyway and since they like to proclaim how they could be split into 5 separate countries if they secede I say we just keep the one with Austin in it and along with PR make it 50.5 states! Or, we could treat it like some crazyass American Vatican City!
 

mikita's helmet

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
7,876
Liked Posts:
1,107
Location:
Anacortes, WA via Glenview, IL
Austin is pretty damn sweet. True dat. Well you know how it is with TX, they're always lobbing secession threats into the atmosphere anyway and since they like to proclaim how they could be split into 5 separate countries if they secede I say we just keep the one with Austin in it and along with PR make it 50.5 states! Or, we could treat it like some crazyass American Vatican City!



With this caveat...



As long as we make sure that US Citizens residing in our nation's capital, cannot vote for the President, or be represented by a voting member in either the House or the Senate, I'm with ya 100%.
 

Top