- Joined:
- Jun 9, 2011
- Posts:
- 15,516
- Liked Posts:
- 8,287
- Location:
- Chicago
My favorite teams
Which do you prefer?
Also, which is more cost effective?
I personally prefer renting to buying because I like having my options open, and buying seems too "permanent" to me. I'd hate buying a house only to want to live somewhere else in a few years, regretting my decision.
I also see these articles stating that buying is cheaper because the average rent paid by people in Illinois is $1,100 a month, while the average mortgage is ~ $900 a month. But there's a lot more payments you're responsible for when buying as opposed to renting. If you own, you pay gas, water, electricity, property tax, home insurance, and you're responsible for all repairs. When you rent, often times heat/water and occasionally electricity are included in your rent. There is no annual property tax you pay, and you aren't paying for things that break (unless you broke it of course.)
For example's sake... Let's say you bought a $200,000 home, and put down 40k to avoid the PMI. This is a 30-year fixed mortgage.
Mortgage - 825/month
Property Tax - 300/month
Insurance - 80/month
Energy Bill (Electricity/Gas) - 280/month
Water- 70/month
Home Repair - 170/month (on average over the life of the house)
I'm going to leave out home improvement and lawn car costs. This can vary a lot.
That comes out to 1,775/month, which is 675 more than the average rent cost.
After 30 years, that's 243,000 more spent on owning as opposed to renting. Add the 40k you put down, and that's 283,000.
The biggest appeal of owning is that it's an investment, and you can sell it to make money back when you're done with it. Ok that's fine, but during that same time, if you were renting and saved over 200,000, that money could have been invested elsewhere, and you could have been making more money throughout all that time instead of waiting decades to see a return.
I suppose if you get lucky, you could buy a house in an okay neighborhood that becomes a great neighborhood over the years, and the value of your home could sky rocket as a result, but there are only so many people that benefit in a way like this.
Am I off base here? Or is the real benefit of owning simply saying that it's yours? And if so, is it really worth that much?
Also, which is more cost effective?
I personally prefer renting to buying because I like having my options open, and buying seems too "permanent" to me. I'd hate buying a house only to want to live somewhere else in a few years, regretting my decision.
I also see these articles stating that buying is cheaper because the average rent paid by people in Illinois is $1,100 a month, while the average mortgage is ~ $900 a month. But there's a lot more payments you're responsible for when buying as opposed to renting. If you own, you pay gas, water, electricity, property tax, home insurance, and you're responsible for all repairs. When you rent, often times heat/water and occasionally electricity are included in your rent. There is no annual property tax you pay, and you aren't paying for things that break (unless you broke it of course.)
For example's sake... Let's say you bought a $200,000 home, and put down 40k to avoid the PMI. This is a 30-year fixed mortgage.
Mortgage - 825/month
Property Tax - 300/month
Insurance - 80/month
Energy Bill (Electricity/Gas) - 280/month
Water- 70/month
Home Repair - 170/month (on average over the life of the house)
I'm going to leave out home improvement and lawn car costs. This can vary a lot.
That comes out to 1,775/month, which is 675 more than the average rent cost.
After 30 years, that's 243,000 more spent on owning as opposed to renting. Add the 40k you put down, and that's 283,000.
The biggest appeal of owning is that it's an investment, and you can sell it to make money back when you're done with it. Ok that's fine, but during that same time, if you were renting and saved over 200,000, that money could have been invested elsewhere, and you could have been making more money throughout all that time instead of waiting decades to see a return.
I suppose if you get lucky, you could buy a house in an okay neighborhood that becomes a great neighborhood over the years, and the value of your home could sky rocket as a result, but there are only so many people that benefit in a way like this.
Am I off base here? Or is the real benefit of owning simply saying that it's yours? And if so, is it really worth that much?