Ricketts stated "World Series", if he gets his way.

mountsalami

New member
Joined:
Aug 19, 2012
Posts:
854
Liked Posts:
1,129
Location:
Rectal Cavity
Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s refusal to sell bonds for a $500 million renovation of Wrigley Field is poised to help extend a debt rally that has pushed the city’s relative borrowing costs to a four-year low.

The Chicago Cubs Major League Baseball franchise, which hasn’t won a championship since 1908, would finance the upgrades to the 99-year-old ballpark based on a plan the team and city released last week. Cubs Chairman Tom Ricketts, who co-founded bond underwriter Incapital LLC and tried to get Chicago and Illinois to help pay for construction, said the team will win the World Series if the proposal is approved.

Chicago Wins Lowest Cost Since ’09 Making Cubs Pay John Zich/Bloomberg
People walk past Wrigley Field, home of the Chicago Cubs baseball team in Chicago, Illinois.

People walk past Wrigley Field, home of the Chicago Cubs baseball team in Chicago, Illinois. Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel has warned retirement obligations may consume about 20 percent of the budget within four years.

Emanuel’s decision to withhold public money shows he’s focusing on the strains of the city’s pension costs, said Laurence Msall, president of the Civic Federation, a Chicago nonprofit group specializing in government finances. The Democratic mayor has warned retirement obligations may consume about 20 percent of the budget within four years. The stadium move may also extend gains that have shrunk the yield penalty on some city obligations to the lowest since 2009.

“Chicago has to worry about how to fund essential parts of city government -- this would have been a distraction,” said Shawn O’Leary, senior research analyst in Chicago for Nuveen Asset Management, which oversees about $95 billion of munis. “It would have been an additional strain on their finances.”

‘Precedential’ Deal
The third-most-populous U.S. city’s resistance to stadium debt differs from municipalities including Miami. Voters there will decide via referendum next month whether to support part of a $350 million improvement to Sun Life Stadium for the National Football League’s Dolphins.

Chicago’s deal has the potential to be “precedential” because it wouldn’t be issuing bonds to support a privately owned sports team, said Donald Haider, a former city finance director. He was involved in negotiations with the Chicago Bears that led to a revenue bond sale for sky boxes at Soldier Field in 1979, backed by parking receipts.

Wrigley renovation plans provoked resistance from then- Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley and Governor Pat Quinn in 2010 because the Ricketts family was pushing for the state to sell $300 million of tax-exempt bonds to finance the deal. Emanuel, who took office in May 2011, repeatedly said he didn’t want taxpayer money used.

Rating Threat
Tom Ricketts is a son of TD Ameritrade Holding Corp. founder Joe Ricketts. The family bought the team in 2009 from the Tribune Co.

Emanuel, 53, a former investment banker, U.S. congressman and President Barack Obama’s ex-chief of staff, faces pressure from ratings companies as the city recovers from the 18-month recession that ended almost four years ago. Moody’s Investors Service put Chicago’s Aa3 bond rating on review for downgrade last week, citing “large adjusted net pension liabilities.” The grade is the company’s fourth-highest mark.

The Emanuel administration has warned that retirement contributions will cost about $1.2 billion within four years if the state legislature doesn’t restructure the system, up from $476 million last year.

Deficit Dilemma
Chicago faced a deficit of $298 million before the approval in November of the 2013 spending plan, which would eliminate the projected gap without raising fees or taxes. Chicago Public Schools said last month it intends to close 54 schools as part of a plan to eliminate a $1 billion shortfall.

With municipal interest rates below their five-decade average, investors looking to pad returns have sought Chicago debt for their relatively higher yields.

Buyers this month demanded as little as 0.24 percentage point of additional yield to own tax-exempt Chicago general- obligation bonds maturing in January 2032 rather than benchmark munis due the same year, data compiled by Bloomberg show. That’s the smallest spread since 2009. The bonds also traded this year at the lowest yield since their 2007 issuance.

The ballpark deal isn’t complete yet, and any agreement may yet add to the city’s burden, said Haider, a professor of management at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management, which is based in Evanston, Illinois.

Landmark Status
After the proposed renovation agreement was announced April 15, Ricketts said he wants a landmark status tax break and doesn’t want to pay Chicago for expanding the venue onto public sidewalks and streets. These concessions, if adopted by the city council, would indirectly put part of the cost of renovations on the backs of taxpayers.

The most important point was “having the flexibility to run Wrigley Field and the Cubs like a business,” said Dennis Culloton, a spokesman for the Ricketts family. “This comes pretty close to achieving that.”

“Wrigley Field is a cherished institution in Chicago and the Wrigleyville community, but it is not the taxpayers’ responsibility to rebuild this private venue,” Sarah Hamilton, Emanuel’s communications director, said in an e-mail. “The framework that we have reached allows the Cubs to restore the Friendly Confines and pursue their economic goals.”

Chicago and Illinois have spent taxpayer dollars to build or update stadiums for the Chicago White Sox and the Chicago Bears, and this deal charts a new course because it recognizes that neither the city nor the state can afford to commit funds for sports teams, Msall said.

Taxpayer Hook
“This Wrigley Field renovation breaks from the precedent of having the government on the hook for financing,” Msall said.

States and cities are poised to sell about $7.8 billion of bonds this week, the least since the period through April 5, Bloomberg data show. They issued about $20 billion in the past two weeks, the most this year.

Even with the supply wave, the yield on benchmark 10-year munis has fallen about 0.2 percentage point since the start of April. Municipal debt is set this month for its biggest return since November, in its fifth-straight April rebound.

At 1.75 percent, yields on AAA munis due in 2023 are about 104 percent of the interest rate on similar-maturity Treasuries, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

The ratio, a gauge of relative value, has been above 100 percent for seven straight trading days. The higher the percentage, the cheaper local debt is compared with federal securities.
 

KBisBack!

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,497
Liked Posts:
1,424
Notice how everything Ricketts has said since taking over the team revolves around "Winning The World Series"

He said it when he bought the team.

Theo and Co. said that was the goal every year when the new management team was brought in.

And now he is saying it again to get his way for more night games, more non baseball events, a huge jumbotron to sell advertisements on and a hotel across the street that he can charge $1000 a night per room during the season, basically more profits.

However the product on the field is further away from the World Series than at any point in my life and is well behind where the franchise was a decade ago.
 

mountsalami

New member
Joined:
Aug 19, 2012
Posts:
854
Liked Posts:
1,129
Location:
Rectal Cavity
I guess since the City of Chicago is not footing his bill.

A World Series run will just be by happenstance rather than trying to get the players signed to do so.

Let's hope we get lucky and are able to ride the golden arms of players cut from the mold of Volstad, Feldman, Germhole, and the likes.

At some point this Cubs Way, book of basics, is going to sink into these one and two year contracted players, at the same time, and a beautiful thing will happen.

Too bad it didn't happen this year because the new COMMITED slogan is now the new headlines at Command Central for us as fans to salivate over.
 

Franko725

New member
Joined:
Feb 9, 2011
Posts:
1,034
Liked Posts:
719
Location:
Terre Haute, IN
I am tired of hearing about all of the restraints that the Wrigleyville community wants to put on the Cubs. People want to live there because it is Wrigleyville. What the hell do they think would happen if the Cubs were to move? Property values in the area would drop. The bars would lose customers and money. The rooftop owners would have what exactly? A rooftop that makes them what money?

Yes, the Cubs should be able to play as many night games as they want. The White Sox don't have a cap on the number that they can play. They should also be able to bring in more revenue from other sources. They don't have the advertising revenue like other teams have. They have a terrible TV contract compared to what other teams have. But yet, everyone wants this team to spend all sorts of money on the roster. If they were bringing more in, they could spend more. It is a business after all, and they aren't in it to lose money.

I am ecstatic that they are not going to be using government money. It is awesome to see the owners put their own money into their park. So, let them build what they want. Wrigley is a dump after all. And I love the place, but it is still a dump. It would be amazing to go there and see an updated park.
 

KBisBack!

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,497
Liked Posts:
1,424
They have a terrible TV contract compared to what other teams have. But yet, everyone wants this team to spend all sorts of money on the roster. If they were bringing more in, they could spend more. It is a business after all, and they aren't in it to lose money.

No they don't. Their TV contract is not close to as bad as the PR campaign has convinced people that it is.

When you see the posted local TV revenue, that revenue does not include WGN since it is a superstation that is broadcast nationwide. If you include WGN with the local TV revenue, the Cubs are probably still in the top 10 in TV revenue.

And the Cubs already have been bringing in more money since the Ricketts bought the team.

Revenue has gone up in the three years they have owned the team. Payroll has gone done drastically.

So the theory that if they bring in more, they will spend more on revenue has already been proven false.

Yes it is a business and no one has ever said they should lose money. But it is also professional sports after all, and the object is to win games.
 

AmericanFlyer1

New member
Joined:
Apr 22, 2013
Posts:
81
Liked Posts:
97
So the theory that if they bring in more, they will spend more on revenue has already been proven false.

Yes it is a business and no one has ever said they should lose money. But it is also professional sports after all, and the object is to win games.


I think this is a concept that is hard to understand. They are dutiful sheep that always believe what they are told. This kind of "off the cuff", "think for yourself", "watch and see what they do" logic seems to evade some.

Some get downright pissed when you go against the logic they were told to believe.

Bottom line, this team sucks and if two years of this crap on the field is any measure of the "Ricketts" era...we have many more years of garbage to look forward to.
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
I never knew that adding a hotel and parties in the streets won a World Series. How the heck did the 05 Sox do it without that? Amazing.
 

ClydeLee

New member
Joined:
Jun 29, 2010
Posts:
14,829
Liked Posts:
4,113
Location:
The OP
I never knew that adding a hotel and parties in the streets won a World Series. How the heck did the 05 Sox do it without that? Amazing.

Getting a company to name the stadium and using the revenue instead of worrying about bitchy fan reaction.

Sent from Neverwhere using Taptalk
 

Boobaby1

New member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
2,236
Liked Posts:
1,180
I think this is a concept that is hard to understand. They are dutiful sheep that always believe what they are told. This kind of "off the cuff", "think for yourself", "watch and see what they do" logic seems to evade some.

Some get downright pissed when you go against the logic they were told to believe.

Bottom line, this team sucks and if two years of this crap on the field is any measure of the "Ricketts" era...we have many more years of garbage to look forward to.

And we are the landfill for that garbage.
 

KBisBack!

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,497
Liked Posts:
1,424
I think this is a concept that is hard to understand. They are dutiful sheep that always believe what they are told. This kind of "off the cuff", "think for yourself", "watch and see what they do" logic seems to evade some.

Ricketts is a very smart man.

He knows he can keep dangling the carrot of "Win The World Series" and many Cub fans will believe what ever he says.
 

AmericanFlyer1

New member
Joined:
Apr 22, 2013
Posts:
81
Liked Posts:
97
Ricketts is a very smart man.

He knows he can keep dangling the carrot of "Win The World Series" and many Cub fans will believe what ever he says.


He really is and I am not being sarcastic in saying that.

He has effectively cut the payroll by vast numbers; yet nobody seems to care.

He has effectively increased revenue by vast numbers and most are excited about it. Hotels, McDonald's, Media Deals, etc...

And at the same time, has put in inferior product, at the major league level, on the field and there are many fans out there excited to see just how "well" they can do.

Sprinkle in some "world series" talk and you have people drooling all over themselves about it.

Meanwhile, the Chicago Cubs are finding new ways to lose and the only thing they are fighting for is if they can be the worst team in the league this year. With some stiff competition....I think they have what it takes to achieve this goal as well.

From a business standpoint....brilliant.
 

Sunbiz1

New member
Joined:
May 6, 2010
Posts:
6,543
Liked Posts:
1,721
Ricketts is a very smart man.

He knows he can keep dangling the carrot of "Win The World Series" and many Cub fans will believe what ever he says.

You have to build a team to win at Wrigley, something that has never been accomplished...then you renovate the dump. Tom has it backwards.

If fans would actually attend games based on team performance as opposed to the Wrigley experience, then perhaps they would have a better product on the field in the future.
 

Boobaby1

New member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
2,236
Liked Posts:
1,180
He really is and I am not being sarcastic in saying that.

He has effectively cut the payroll by vast numbers; yet nobody seems to care.

He has effectively increased revenue by vast numbers and most are excited about it. Hotels, McDonald's, Media Deals, etc...

And at the same time, has put in inferior product, at the major league level, on the field and there are many fans out there excited to see just how "well" they can do.

Sprinkle in some "world series" talk and you have people drooling all over themselves about it.

Meanwhile, the Chicago Cubs are finding new ways to lose and the only thing they are fighting for is if they can be the worst team in the league this year. With some stiff competition....I think they have what it takes to achieve this goal as well.

From a business standpoint....brilliant.

Hell, all you have to do is look at the CBS board people and the Brewers/Cubs board people and look at how most defend each and every move made by the braintrust at hand.

It's been 105 years.....what's a few more? LOL

The way I see it is....

It's been 105 years.....we need to start winning yesterday. LOL
 

mountsalami

New member
Joined:
Aug 19, 2012
Posts:
854
Liked Posts:
1,129
Location:
Rectal Cavity
**** the BC board. They are a bunch of ESPN Special person castaways that have formed a needle workshop together.

May have been the single most pathetic website that I am personally ashamed to have been a part of.

Have never seen so many mental midgets huddled around one another.
 

KBisBack!

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,497
Liked Posts:
1,424
**** the BC board. They are a bunch of ESPN Special person castaways that have formed a needle workshop together.

May have been the single most pathetic website that I am personally ashamed to have been a part of.

Have never seen so many mental midgets huddled around one another.

That site was truly awful on all levels.
 

patg006

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,413
Liked Posts:
986
Location:
Chicago
**** the BC board. They are a bunch of ESPN Special person castaways that have formed a needle workshop together.

May have been the single most pathetic website that I am personally ashamed to have been a part of.

Have never seen so many mental midgets huddled around one another.

I only went there for you guys.....it was full of idiots, I'll say that.

I may trust a kindergartener to give me better information and debate;

Speaking of which, where's our special little wizard Chris J?
 

Franko725

New member
Joined:
Feb 9, 2011
Posts:
1,034
Liked Posts:
719
Location:
Terre Haute, IN
No they don't. Their TV contract is not close to as bad as the PR campaign has convinced people that it is.

When you see the posted local TV revenue, that revenue does not include WGN since it is a superstation that is broadcast nationwide. If you include WGN with the local TV revenue, the Cubs are probably still in the top 10 in TV revenue.

Tribune reported earlier this year that the Cubs get about 60 million a year from the TV contracts. Compare that to the 280 million a year that the Dodgers are getting. I would call that terrible.

Amazing how much more money you could put into the roster with another $220 million dollars in revenue. Obviously all the money wouldn't go into payroll, but a good chunk could.
 

KBisBack!

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,497
Liked Posts:
1,424
Tribune reported earlier this year that the Cubs get about 60 million a year from the TV contracts. Compare that to the 280 million a year that the Dodgers are getting. I would call that terrible.

Amazing how much more money you could put into the roster with another $220 million dollars in revenue. Obviously all the money wouldn't go into payroll, but a good chunk could.

So since the Cubs get less than the Dodgers, who just signed their deal, means their deal is awful??

Brilliant logic.

EVERY team's TV deal looks terrible compared to that.

How about compare that $60 million to the rest of the league and if it and see how it compares.

How about compare the Cubs $60M against the Brewers, Rockies, Royals and Rays at $20M or Miami and Pirates at $18??

Those numbers were taking from an article in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinal.

The listed the top teams as the Dodgers at $220M, Angels and Rangers at $150M, Yankees at $90M and Houston at $80M as the top teams.

So the Cubs $60M is really only terrible compared to three teams that just signed their new TV deals in the last three years and the Dodgers and Angels were just in the last year or so.

Total agenda at play whining about the Cubs 'terrible' TV deal.

Either agenda or just stupidity and being brainwashed by the Cubs PR campaign about how poor they are.
 

Top