- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 14,990
- Liked Posts:
- 14,794
We have all seen them. Little crosses or whatnot set up in locations where someone loses a loved one in a collision.
Is it just me, or is that just a shitty way to remember someone?
I understand the point...memorializing a lost loved one... but the execution and location is just terrible.
Reason being, Your loved one lived a rich, full life. They had things they loved to do, places they loved to be.
....yet you choose to set up a summation of their life at the spot of their death- where they were terrified, in agony, confused, and ultimately finished. You then go there to put new flowers or pictures down at the exact spot of the worst few seconds of their existence. The least enjoyable single spot they have occupied in their lives.
Seems like the most horrible way possible to pay tribute to them.
Why not memorialize them at a place they loved?
Am I off base on this?
Is it just me, or is that just a shitty way to remember someone?
I understand the point...memorializing a lost loved one... but the execution and location is just terrible.
Reason being, Your loved one lived a rich, full life. They had things they loved to do, places they loved to be.
....yet you choose to set up a summation of their life at the spot of their death- where they were terrified, in agony, confused, and ultimately finished. You then go there to put new flowers or pictures down at the exact spot of the worst few seconds of their existence. The least enjoyable single spot they have occupied in their lives.
Seems like the most horrible way possible to pay tribute to them.
Why not memorialize them at a place they loved?
Am I off base on this?