- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 17,641
- Liked Posts:
- 11,801
- Location:
- wv
Andrew Luck over Wilson without a moments hesitation.
Luck is by far the best young qb in the nfl right now and it's not even close imho
Andrew Luck over Wilson without a moments hesitation.
Wilson had the worst season of his career last year. Running QBs don't get better and tend to age poorly given their dependence on physical attributes. Wilson being in the league three years doesn't really matter at this point because he isn't getting better, and I doubt he outlasts Rivers/Ben/Rodgers/Romo as starters.
Luck is by far the best young qb in the nfl right now and it's not even close imho
lol. I guess as a Bears fan you are spoiled by your QB winning enough games to get to the playoffs nearly every year. And all of the SB victories.
Rodgers is 70-33 in regular season and 6-5 in the playoffs. What is your point?
Rodgers is the best QB around. I'm responding to the idea that he had carried the Packers any where.
Luck is by far the best young qb in the nfl right now and it's not even close imho
Now for the real question: would you want the Bears to pay $25M/year to sign Wilson?
Were Brady and Rodgers playing with an all time top few defense their first few years & topped off with a great ground and pound running game?
Russ doesn't carry his team like Rodgers and it isn't even close
Wilson had the worst season of his career last year. Running QBs don't get better and tend to age poorly given their dependence on physical attributes. Wilson being in the league three years doesn't really matter at this point because he isn't getting better, and I doubt he outlasts Rivers/Ben/Rodgers/Romo as starters.
I consider the playoffs an accomplishment. I watched a lot of non-playoff Packer seasons. Rodgers got hurt and they went 8-7-1 and still made the playoffs. If by anywhere, you mean the Super Bowl? Well you have lofty goals for your team. The playoffs are just fine by me watching the Packer teams I grew up with.
You mean like how the Packers were 6-2 in games in which Rodgers threw more than 3 passes in 2013, while they were 2-5 -1 otherwise without him? That kinda carrying a team doesn't work for you?Rodgers is the best QB around. I'm responding to the idea that he had carried the Packers any where.
#1defenses combined with top 5 running games make slightly better than average QB's seem elite.
Jim McMahon would disagree
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well since he went 39-7 with a SB ring as a starter with such, and since the premise of this thread is that mediocre passing stats don't determine worth, winning does. McMahon was elite during that stint.Jim McMahon would disagree
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So you're saying that teams can win SB's with #1 defenses and great running games and QB's that just make a few plays when needed? Interesting.Trent Dilfer's elite 2000 season would also disagree.
So you're saying that teams can win SB's with #1 defenses and great running games and QB's that just make a few plays when needed? Interesting.
So you're saying that teams can win SB's with #1 defenses and great running games and QB's that just make a few plays when needed? Interesting.
But Baltimore gave up 108 and 100 more points in the seasons bookending Trents SB with Balt. Are you ignoring his effect on the defense? Or is that just a R Wilson effect?
So, QB's that have #1 D's and great running games can seem elite while truthfully not being so...except, of course, R Wilson. Hell, he took Seattle's above average defense made them #1 3 years running and carried them to a SB victory, all while abstaining from sex and fielding phone calls from God. Truly Elite.Nope, I'm merely pointing out how elite these QBs seemed
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk