Sources: Hawks Looking To Make A Big Move

DACUBBIEKILLA

New member
Joined:
Feb 9, 2011
Posts:
69
Liked Posts:
30
Location:
Channahon IL.
Well who is out there for a solid 2nd line center, because we need someone to help hossa and put sharpie back with towes and kane. i know its asking alot but we also need big nasty tough guys to put infront of the net to make some play's happen too.

WHITESOXHATER
OUT!!!!!!
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
Well who is out there for a solid 2nd line center, because we need someone to help hossa and put sharpie back with towes and kane. i know its asking alot but we also need big nasty tough guys to put infront of the net to make some play's happen too.

WHITESOXHATER
OUT
!!!!!!

bold: you are too much :)

at this point i agree 100%. We need a 2nd line center like 4 weeks ago. defense should not be the BIG move at the deadline.
 

DACUBBIEKILLA

New member
Joined:
Feb 9, 2011
Posts:
69
Liked Posts:
30
Location:
Channahon IL.
What are u not buying? we do need these positions filled we lost so much in team chemistry from last year. and our new role players really cant be even called role players !
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
What are u not buying? we do need these positions filled we lost so much in team chemistry from last year. and our new role players really cant be even called role players !

I dont know what his thoughts are since he wasnt really being descriptive. if anyone thinks they can win as is they are mistaken. There are obvious issues in house, and issues with the lines that need to be corrected.
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
We cant have bottom 6 guys playing in the top 6. I dont mind Brouwer with Kane and Toews but Kopecky getting PP time and etc has to stop. Also by getting a Center Sharp can move back to the wing and worry a bit more about offense than playing center and having t play two way a bit more, I personally think he is more effeciv on the Wing
 

DACUBBIEKILLA

New member
Joined:
Feb 9, 2011
Posts:
69
Liked Posts:
30
Location:
Channahon IL.
So thanks for the team sign and when do we get our website?
 

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
Stalberg/Skille for honey roasted peanuts.
 

bobferg

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Oct 16, 2010
Posts:
1,186
Liked Posts:
275
Location:
Indianapolis
Also by getting a Center Sharp can move back to the wing and worry a bit more about offense than playing center and having t play two way a bit more, I personally think he is more effeciv on the Wing

Sharp needs to worry about defense, he is one of the worst 5-5 defensive players in the league right now.
 

Everyday I'm Byfuglien

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Oct 8, 2010
Posts:
3,194
Liked Posts:
1,463
What are u not buying? we do need these positions filled we lost so much in team chemistry from last year. and our new role players really cant be even called role players !

I particularly don't buy the Seabrook rumors. Lose him and the team has zero physical players on the blue line. He's a good player. I think they keep him.

You can buy into all the vague, cryptic rumors you want. Until someone starts naming names from both teams involved, they really are completely worthless.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
I particularly don't buy the Seabrook rumors. Lose him and the team has zero physical players on the blue line. He's a good player. I think they keep him.

You can buy into all the vague, cryptic rumors you want. Until someone starts naming names from both teams involved, they really are completely worthless.

This
 

southern_cross_116

New member
Joined:
May 24, 2010
Posts:
1,748
Liked Posts:
1,012
Location:
Australia
Stalberg/Skille for honey roasted peanuts.

That's probably about all you'd get for them, too ( well actually honey roasting might be gravy- I would have figured raw, and non-organic :D. ) ... in terms of what either would mean to a team looking to shore up for a playoff run. But I suppose if it is the Hawks doing the shoring up -then maybe they might be able to go.

What I don't get, seriously, is guys complaining about the team's top 6 forwards when if you look at the depth chart on D --- then within 12 months you;ll be bemoaning the lack of depth on defense (which if anyone has paid attention to -isn't exactly deep either ... Jassen Cullimore playing this season anyone? )... Nick Boynton as a top 5 guy? And Hjallmarsson's being over-rated and not developing at all this season... plus playing a 19 year old who doesn't appear to be able to buy an assist.

So the answer is deal your legitimate number 2 having a career season?

I doubt that is the problem really; it seems like the Defense is just plain too shallow this season and if you gut it any more, you will not be seeing much change in the results unless they go even further downhill.

Personally, aside from loving the unsubstantiated rumours, I could buy that it is playing hard ball with Seabrook's agent trying to get an extension done now. However, if I were Seabrook, I would be in it for the money - so Stan is in a bit of a spot I bet.
 
Last edited:

Captain Iago

Giver of Occular Proof
Donator
Joined:
May 24, 2010
Posts:
5,905
Liked Posts:
1,974
That's probably about all you'd get for them, too ( well actually honey roasting might be gravy- I would have figured raw, and non-organic :D. ) ... in terms of what either would mean to a team looking to shore up for a playoff run. But I suppose if it is the Hawks doing the shoring up -then maybe they might be able to go.

What I don't get, seriously, is guys complaining about the team's top 6 forwards when if you look at the depth chart on D --- then within 12 months you;ll be bemoaning the lack of depth on defense (which if anyone has paid attention to -isn't exactly deep either ... Jassen Cullimore playing this season anyone? )... Nick Boynton as a top 5 guy? And Hjallmarsson's being over-rated and not developing at all this season... plus playing a 19 year old who doesn't appear to be able to buy an assist.

So the answer is deal your legitimate number 2 having a career season?

I doubt that is the problem really; it seems like the Defense is just plain too shallow this season and if you gut it any more, you will not be seeing much change in the results unless they go even further downhill.

Personally, aside from loving the unsubstantiated rumours, I could buy that it is playing hard ball with Seabrook's agent trying to get an extension done now. However, if I were Seabrook, I would be in it for the money - so Stan is in a bit of a spot I bet.

After reading the article, that's what I totally buy.
 

Top