The Panel #2: A Bulls Offseason Blog

[Crystallas]

The Panel: Bulls Pre-Off-Season Asset Busters 2011 |

Talking about the 5 guys coming off the books, the worth of our picks, and who could come up in the central next season.

 

[AE23]

this looks epic! lemme see what we got here. AD is X, yes?

 

[X]

this looks epic! lemme see what we got here. AD is X, yes?

yup.

 

[AE23]

well done, but MAOR!

 

[X]

thoughts?

 

[AE23]

when i was done reading it, i thought there would be more, but then i dont mind reading, and can see why you wanted to keep it short

 

[X]

when i was done reading it, i thought there would be more, but then i dont mind reading, and can see why you wanted to keep it short

Yeah, I think part of the reason to keep it short is b/c it makes it easier on the writers to a.) get it done and b.) not get off-topic. now, if we could get closer to 5-6 participants, the length of the article would be slightly better, imo...but we'll get there eventually.

 

[Bullsman24]

just let me know if you need any more participants, I would love to contribute. I really like the columnist approach to the article.

 

[clonetrooper264]

Yeah, I think part of the reason to keep it short is b/c it makes it easier on the writers to a.) get it done and b.) not get off-topic. now, if we could get closer to 5-6 participants, the length of the article would be slightly better, imo...but we'll get there eventually.

Well if you're willing to take anyone off of this board, I'll throw in my opinion in a couple things here and there if needed.

 

[X]

just let me know if you need any more participants, I would love to contribute. I really like the columnist approach to the article.

Well if you're willing to take anyone off of this board, I'll throw in my opinion in a couple things here and there if needed.

Cool Deal...we'll get back to you all. Ideally it grows into it's own beast...I can't see how board contribution could be deemed as a bad thing.