The QB lost us this game

CHIBEAR

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 5, 2020
Posts:
1,397
Liked Posts:
1,005
he had all day to throw almost every time he dropped back to pass - the pack had no pass rush and their CBs suck - we should have scored at least 30 on them today ….
He didnt have all day to throw every time he dropped back thats a flat out ridiculous claim tor be making

As Ive been saying since camp the Bears shotgun passing scheme is flawed both in route construction and blocking scheme not to mention oline talent .

The Bears problems are not because of Fields but because the coach refuses to accept the limitations of his team and as a result keeps trying to plug a square peg into a round hole .

The Bears have the occasional success from the shotgun but the only sustained success the Bears have had has been from its jumbo and multiple TE packages with Fields under center but Nagy doesn't know how to scheme a passing attack from those packages and in this situation his lack of experience is what is hurting the team more than Fields .

We ran the ball at over 5 ypc again and the coach cant scheme an attack to take advantage of it and even more so his over reliance on personnel packages with inferior personnel that dont really fool the defenses . We waste a lot of possessions doing $hit we have no business doing simply because the coach refuses to accept the limitations of his team .


When you look back at some of the successful Bears teams they have all understood their limitations and maximized what they do well this coaching staff seems to be frown upon it and would rather keep chasing something its not
 
Last edited:

JurisFrog

Active member
Joined:
Mar 16, 2021
Posts:
155
Liked Posts:
195
You know what you're getting from Dalton, a mediocre starting QB who shits the bed in big games.

With this team, Dalton might get you another win or two. But that's still likely 7 or 8 wins. And then you have not gotten Fields the reps he needs.

You're so deep on Andy's dick that you can taste your own ass, we get that. But this really isn't about Dalton have a little better chance to beat the Packers. It's about the long term future of the Bears, and you are too glued to Dalton's nutsack to pretend you care about that. You can't even spell Aaron Rodgers' name correctly. Any Bears fan could do that.

oh please. You’re just Butthurt that your savior Fields looked like a total goober today even with what Terry Bradshaw said on air was a dumbed-down limited offense. He can’t even run the simple stuff right. Fields isn’t a savior he’s a bust and I cannot wait to watch this Board completely melt down as you figure that out, week after week.

oh and auto-correct, dumbass.
 

Anytime23

Boding Well
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
37,292
Liked Posts:
36,037
Oh, you made sure to criticize some White QBs so that it won't seem like your criticisms of Fields has anything to do with race?

Way to dot your i's and cross your t's man!
you’re on it today!
 

didshereallysaythat

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2011
Posts:
21,035
Liked Posts:
9,917
Our secondary is good, even with all these injuries.
Not really. On the play where Greg Olson was saying the Bears needed to checkdown on 3rd and long to get a FG to make it 24-17 instead of rolling out with all deep routes, the slot receiver actually gets wide open on an in route but Fields takes his eyes off to scramble. And then there was the busted coverage that Fields did not see Robinson wide open that would have been a walk in touchdown. The problem is Fields can not read defenses yet.

The Packers opponents to date with their passing offense ranks:

Saints - 31st
Lions - 26th
49ers - 14th
Steelers - 15th
Bengals - 20th
Bears - 32nd

The Packers have one impressive victory over the 49ers and even that took a last second 55 yard FG to get. Their passing defense has not really been tested yet.
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
37,661
Liked Posts:
34,941
Location:
Cumming
I won’t say that Fields lost the game simply because if and when the Packers needed to score, Rodgers would have made sure it happened. The Bears defense is mediocre at best.

That said, Fields was bad. He was going against a terrible secondary missing 3 of their 4 starters. He can’t see open receivers.

Desai is much better than Pagano. He's not as fucking stupid, that's for sure, but Desai has Quinn playing at a high level. That being said, he's waaay too passive on defense and every week there are still coverage breakdowns. That's on the scheme and coaching. The whole coaching staff needs to go
 

dennehy

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 29, 2015
Posts:
11,446
Liked Posts:
12,487
Location:
Jewels to get a case of Squirt
oh please. You’re just Butthurt that your savior Fields looked like a total goober today even with what Terry Bradshaw said on air was a dumbed-down limited offense. He can’t even run the simple stuff right. Fields isn’t a savior he’s a bust and I cannot wait to watch this Board completely melt down as you figure that out, week after week.

oh and auto-correct, dumbass.
I feel like being butthurt is coming on to a board pretending you're a fan of a team but really you just love one mediocre player, and then doing something like chastising an entire fan base because they don't like your butt buddy enough. You are triggered, and also super deep on Andy Dalton's dick. It's funny when you use the term 'savior' to describe someone unironically, because your feelings for him run way deeper than that.

Dalton is not the future of this team, pretty simple. Great guy, mediocre starting QB, not on the Bears one or two years from now.

Auto correct works for last names? LOL, that's about as plausible as one of your courtroom arguments.
 
Last edited:

BearsJR

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 7, 2012
Posts:
2,850
Liked Posts:
1,404
Guessed? Do you have a memory? No one put together garbage yards as well as Trub once the game was over. That's what he was best at.

I haven't bee around here long, but long enough to see all those calling Montgomery a bust that first year when it was fairly obvious to most of us he was the real deal. I have to assume Perspective and anyone agreeing with him were on of those by their judgement of Fields.
Umm Matt Stafford, AKA Stat Padford entered the chat.
 

10veitout

Quack quack 🦆
Joined:
Mar 11, 2013
Posts:
4,774
Liked Posts:
345
Not really. On the play where Greg Olson was saying the Bears needed to checkdown on 3rd and long to get a FG to make it 24-17 instead of rolling out with all deep routes, the slot receiver actually gets wide open on an in route but Fields takes his eyes off to scramble. And then there was the busted coverage that Fields did not see Robinson wide open that would have been a walk in touchdown. The problem is Fields can not read defenses yet.

The Packers opponents to date with their passing offense ranks:

Saints - 31st
Lions - 26th
49ers - 14th
Steelers - 15th
Bengals - 20th
Bears - 32nd

The Packers have one impressive victory over the 49ers and even that took a last second 55 yard FG to get. Their passing defense has not really been tested yet.

I would say our victory over the Bengals was impressive. They are 4-2.

One open WR on a play doesn't make a secondary lol.

Our secondary was top 10 last season, and then we added Stokes, a very good player so far. We arent even doing poorly with injuries.
 

didshereallysaythat

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2011
Posts:
21,035
Liked Posts:
9,917
I would say our victory over the Bengals was impressive. They are 4-2.

One open WR on a play doesn't make a secondary lol.

Our secondary was top 10 last season, and then we added Stokes, a very good player so far. We arent even doing poorly with injuries.
The Bengals are not good dude. Atleast on offense. Burrow might end up good but their offensive line is even worse than the Bears and that is saying something.

If the Packers secondary is healthy, yes they are good and were last year. But they are not. They lost Stokes today and were without their starting corners. They signed a guy off the street. A good offense would have taken advantage of that. The Bears are not a good offense.
 

Perspective

Active member
Joined:
Dec 23, 2020
Posts:
471
Liked Posts:
363
Yes it is lol. It was top 10 last season, and we added Stokes, who is a baller.

We only had one bad secondary performance this season, week one. We are holding up in spite of injuries.
Mahomes, Lamar Jax, Kyler Murray will destroy your D
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
45,848
Liked Posts:
35,139
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
Defense played well enough
Running game was great
The protection was fine all day

The QB threw a dumb int …. Missed a wide open ARob for what would have been a TD … had all day to throw and could not throw to anyone playing against a team with no CBs

Andy Dalton or even Mitch Trubisky wins this game …
 

Mighty Joe Young

Living in Troll's Heads Rent-Free for Decades
Joined:
Feb 8, 2021
Posts:
10,574
Liked Posts:
9,188
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
He didnt have all day to throw every time he dropped back thats a flat out ridiculous claim tor be making

As Ive been saying since camp the Bears shotgun passing scheme is flawed both in route construction and blocking scheme not to mention oline talent . The options on most pass plays are

The Bears problems are not because of Fields but because the coach refuses to accept the limitations of his team and as a result keeps trying to plug a square peg into a round hole .

The Bears have the occasional success from the shotgun but the only sustained success the Bears have had has been from its jumbo and multiple TE packages with Fields under center but Nagy doesn't know how to scheme a passing attack from those packages and in this situation his lack of experience is what is hurting the team more than Fields .

We ran the ball at over 5 ypc again and the coach cant scheme an attack to take advantage of it and even more so his over reliance on personnel packages with inferior personnel that dont really fool the defenses . We waste a lot of possessions doing $hit we have no business doing simply because the coach refuses to accept the limitations of his team .


When you look back at some of the successful Bears teams they have all understood their limitations and maximized what they do well this coaching staff seems to be frown upon it and would rather keep chasing something its not

Its ironic isn't it that a poster named Perspective has none of it.
 

onebud34

Packer Fan
Donator
Joined:
Aug 16, 2011
Posts:
22,334
Liked Posts:
12,232
Location:
Favorite Corner Bar
My favorite teams
  1. Minnesota Twins
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Minnesota Wild
This is some interesting perspective
 

Mighty Joe Young

Living in Troll's Heads Rent-Free for Decades
Joined:
Feb 8, 2021
Posts:
10,574
Liked Posts:
9,188
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
read this …. Carefully ….where the guy says Fields had all day to throw


Hrm. I read this C-A-R-E-F-U-L-L-Y.

Looks like you didn't though!

"Bears quarterback Justin Fields had all sorts of time to throw in the first half"​
"For Chicago's offensive line, it wasn't great, but there was progress."​

Seems to me you either didn't read it carefully yourself, or neglected to tell the whole story on purpose, dipshit! :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:


:parrot:
 

Anytime23

Boding Well
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
37,292
Liked Posts:
36,037
OP: Fields had all day to throw all game
his source: Fields was harassed in the second half
 

Perspective

Active member
Joined:
Dec 23, 2020
Posts:
471
Liked Posts:
363
Hrm. I read this C-A-R-E-F-U-L-L-Y.

Looks like you didn't though!

"Bears quarterback Justin Fields had all sorts of time to throw in the first half"​
"For Chicago's offensive line, it wasn't great, but there was progress."​

Seems to me you either didn't read it carefully yourself, or neglected to tell the whole story on purpose, dipshit! :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:


:parrot:
Hey dipshit …. From the article “…Four sacks will always be too many …. the plays on which he had all day to throw”

the article also clearly talks about coverage sacks, which is a kind way of saying the QB cannot read defenses and held onto t he ball too long leading to sack ….

Like I said …. He had all day to throw … was playing against garbage CBs and yet could
Not score points in a game where the OL, D and WR/TE came to play …. Dalton wins this game hands down

and like I said before, this does
Not mean Fields is a bust … but it shows that if we want to win games now, Dalton is the better choice … it’s all good though ….
 

Top