- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 37,291
- Liked Posts:
- 36,037
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 21,035
- Liked Posts:
- 9,917
I won’t say that Fields lost the game simply because if and when the Packers needed to score, Rodgers would have made sure it happened. The Bears defense is mediocre at best.
That said, Fields was bad. He was going against a terrible secondary missing 3 of their 4 starters. He can’t see open receivers.
That said, Fields was bad. He was going against a terrible secondary missing 3 of their 4 starters. He can’t see open receivers.
Dstone5553
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Nov 5, 2017
- Posts:
- 710
- Liked Posts:
- 513
Your last sentence reveals the troll in this post.
Or you are an idiot.
Coin flip.
Myk
85in25
- Joined:
- Sep 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 12,282
- Liked Posts:
- 5,059
You want analysis? Trubisky rightfully had less confidence in his arm and took off running early. That worked because the Bears can't get WRs open.
Fields rightfully has more confidence in his arm (and has possibly been told not to take off running 1st chance he gets because that is generally not a great NFL QB or a long lived one). Since we basically have the same team and same plays that's working as good or better than it did when Trubisky was hobbled and stopped from running.
Analysis: It's a freakin rookie QB's 3rd start!
Actual games say Trubisky had about one series where he looked good against the Packers in 4 years. Fields had 2 times he looked good against the Packers in one game, his 3rd NFL start.
Fields isn't looking like a QB you should cut in his 1st year. Trubisky on the other hand was close to being that bad his 1st year, not quite but close (he also had a worse team and worse HC).
Feeva
Active member
- Joined:
- Nov 4, 2012
- Posts:
- 123
- Liked Posts:
- 111
On the Bills chump, as in playing in the place of Mitch
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 853
- Liked Posts:
- 570
Same shit...different day
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 853
- Liked Posts:
- 570
Burn!!!
Aesopian
Hooters Waitress
- Joined:
- Jan 6, 2015
- Posts:
- 16,391
- Liked Posts:
- 8,791
- Location:
- Jupiter
My favorite teams
Probably pretty well like you said its unfair to compare since Mitch is an experienced veteran and the better player but your own accord.
- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 37,291
- Liked Posts:
- 36,037
You're still upset that Mitch was garbage and all of us knew it before you.
Don't talk about burns when you're still nursing injuries from 2019.
Midway Monsters
Active member
- Joined:
- Apr 15, 2016
- Posts:
- 295
- Liked Posts:
- 206
The coaches were not doing Fields any favors with some of those calls. Deep routes when they just need to get in field goal range?
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,723
- Liked Posts:
- 19,871
- Location:
- Charlotte, NC
My favorite teams
This is where we spend so much time trying to understand the whys. I just can't figure it out. I don't think anyone in the world can. If only there was a constant here that we could point to. But clearly there isn't. It's an unsolvable problem.
Perspective
Active member
- Joined:
- Dec 23, 2020
- Posts:
- 471
- Liked Posts:
- 363
This site is full of idiots
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 853
- Liked Posts:
- 570
How did your Golden Boy play today? And I was over Mitch the moment he signed elseware...seriously so sad that you cant let him go, does he owe you money or something? Or better yet did he screw your old lady, or man...no judgement either way
BearsJR
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Oct 7, 2012
- Posts:
- 2,850
- Liked Posts:
- 1,404
An enigma wrapped in a riddle for sure.
- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 37,291
- Liked Posts:
- 36,037
I can let him go. However i cannot sit by as posters with agendas are already bringing out the firing squad when Mitch got 40 something games to disappoint you. Over him the moment he signed in Buffalo lmao, took you 4 years? Moron
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 853
- Liked Posts:
- 570
Yea it sure seems that way, pretty sure you bring him up at least once a thread, often times unprovacted by anyone else...but yea seems like you can let him go ? And yes while Mitch was still on the team I called out the good and shitty play when it was warranted, crazy concept I get that, and he was a white QB...but as soon as he went to another team he was now their problem and I began to put my focus on the current crop of Bears QBs....moron
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 27,749
- Liked Posts:
- 10,511
I will support any QB the Bears put on the field, but today, Justin was not very good
- Joined:
- Jun 20, 2010
- Posts:
- 39,426
- Liked Posts:
- 29,033
- Location:
- In the mod forum planning your ban
Without the int his stat line is fine and he didn’t deserve the int
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 27,749
- Liked Posts:
- 10,511
I agree with that statement, but he still didnt play very well overall..There were open receivers downfield on a few plays and he didn't see them..But, Im still a supporter of his
- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 37,291
- Liked Posts:
- 36,037
Not buying it. You're a bitter Trubisky apologist who was fine letting him slide by in years 3 and 4 but as soon as Justin Fields struggles you're all over him. Prob time to become a Bills fan and follow Mitch if you're going to shit on the Bears future QB.
Sad little guy.
Staff online NOW
-
bamainatlantaYou wake him up, you keep him up