Trade down scenarios with a receiving target.

Which would yo take for the #2 overall

  • ATL --7,38,70 and Kyle Pitts

    Votes: 13 37.1%

  • LAR --10,41, 2024 1st, and D.Adams

    Votes: 17 48.6%

  • ARI-- 5,36 and D. Hopkins

    Votes: 3 8.6%

  • No stay at 2

    Votes: 2 5.7%
  • Total voters
    35
iueyedoc

iueyedoc

Variant Also Negotiates
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
21,645
Liked Posts:
26,701
Location:
Mountains to Sea
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
So names are starting to pop up as trade bait, all of which may be complete bullshit. That said would you make any of these deals if they were offered?
 
Butkus34

Butkus34

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 15, 2010
Posts:
2,038
Liked Posts:
1,953
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
Take the Raiders trade
 
Gustavus Adolphus

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,446
Liked Posts:
36,799
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
The only acceptable answer here is the Raiders option. If you included a 2024 pick with the Cardinals then I’d be tempted, but probably sticking with the Raiders.
 
Aesopian

Aesopian

Hooters Waitress
Joined:
Jan 6, 2015
Posts:
16,456
Liked Posts:
8,847
Location:
Jupiter
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
I'd love this trade...

Bears trade 2023 first round pick for Jets Garrett Wilson, 2023 first round pick, 2023 second round pick.

justin-fields-garrett-wilson.jpg

 
bamainatlanta

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
41,033
Liked Posts:
38,384
Location:
Cumming
Or talk to Indy about Buckner or Carolina about Moore or 3T Brown. Don’t really want 2 WR’s that are fast approaching their downside of their career.
 

JP Hochbaum

Well-known member
Joined:
May 22, 2012
Posts:
2,074
Liked Posts:
1,298
rawdawg said:
I don't want a WR over 30. I know Hopkins and Adams are still very good players, but if I'm giving up #1 or 2 overall pick, I want young players. Either picks or a WR like Higgins, Jeudy, DJ Moore.
Click to expand...
You aren't giving up a number 1, just losing out on the amount of picks in the return.
 

JP Hochbaum

Well-known member
Joined:
May 22, 2012
Posts:
2,074
Liked Posts:
1,298
bamainatlanta said:
Or talk to Indy about Buckner or Carolina about Moore or 3T Brown. Don’t really want 2 WR’s that are fast approaching their downside of their career.
Click to expand...
I made a thread about getting Buckner and Pittman in a trade down with Indy.
 
HearshotKDS

HearshotKDS

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 9, 2012
Posts:
7,923
Liked Posts:
8,169
Location:
Lake Forest
I take the "LAR" LVR trade in a heartbeat. Davante Adams contract would let Bears cut him for $0 dead money after '24, bad news is his contract is so backloaded you almost HAVE to cut him after '24. I still take a 2 year rental of stud WR in the end of his prime for the window along with multiple 1sts and a high 2nd - its imo the best mix of more draft lotto tickets along with someone who helps a lot RIGHT NOW when the Bears need to pivot from tanking to kicking ass.
 
bamainatlanta

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
41,033
Liked Posts:
38,384
Location:
Cumming
JP Hochbaum said:
I made a thread about getting Buckner and Pittman in a trade down with Indy.
Click to expand...
Colts aren’t moving Pittman though. They would like to keep their #1 for the QB that they will select. But they might have to move Buckner though.
 
Dejo

Dejo

Godfather of FTO
Joined:
Apr 4, 2011
Posts:
16,507
Liked Posts:
20,174
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Real Salt Lake
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Utah Jazz
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Utah Utes
I ended up picking the Pitts one, two top 10 picks essentially in that trade, but I would agree with most that the Raiders option is likely the best, primarily due to the pick next year, which has a solid chance of being another top 5 pick. That and watching GB melt when Davante scores as a Bear lol
 
Pretzel Logic

Pretzel Logic

“I have forced myself to contradict myself "
Joined:
Mar 20, 2022
Posts:
2,394
Liked Posts:
1,178
My favorite teams
  1. Pittsburgh Pirates
  1. Philadelphia 76ers
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Pittsburgh Penguins

ATL --7,38,70 and Kyle Pitts​


Please.
 
dentfan

dentfan

No gods! No Masters!
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
5,456
Liked Posts:
4,708
iueyedoc said:
So names are starting to pop up as trade bait, all of which may be complete bullshit. That said would you make any of these deals if they were offered?
Click to expand...
Pitts and keep two picks in the top 50? Yes please.

The biggest need we have it a threat underneath, either a Z or UTE, and Pitts would fill it.
 

rawdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
8,013
Liked Posts:
6,460
JP Hochbaum said:
You aren't giving up a number 1, just losing out on the amount of picks in the return.
Click to expand...
You aren't picking 1st or 2nd with these trade, so you lose out on that player. And my point is, if I'm not picking 2nd overall where I can find potentially the best player in the draft and have him for 5 years at a relatively cheap price, then I would like to have more to show for it than a lower pick and a 30+ year old WR, who most likely won't be good by the time that #2 pick reaches the end of his rookie deal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
10,946members
96,423threads
4,583,516posts
776online users

Members online NOW

  • Member
  • Admin
  • Mod
  • Donor
  • HOF
Total: 776 (members: 33, guests: 743)

Staff online NOW

Top