- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 9,995
- Liked Posts:
- 3,624
My favorite teams
I don't want to dig things up from the past about how I felt the DH would not be implemented in the NL due to taking on more salary, etc., but this does impact trade talks and other things. From Bleacher Nation-
No National League Designated Hitter in Next CBA? And Other Bullets
...
Twitter said:Jayson Stark Verified account @jaysonst Jayson Stark Retweeted Scott Kliesen
I don't see anything changing with the DH. Sorry!
Scott Kliesen @skliesen
@jaysonst All those words, and not once did you mention DH. I had heard there was a push to expand DH to NL. You must not think so.
Keep in mind, that’s someone who’s been reporting on the CBA, talking to both sides, for weeks. If you’re a proponent of the DH in the NL, you can consider your gut punched. I remain deeply frustrated by the inequity between the leagues by having a rule that inarguably favors the AL, but I have always questioned whether the appetite was going to be there for owners to approve the addition of what amounts to another high-paid position. I doubt AL owners feel strongly either way (and probably would lean against it), and I suspect most NL owners don’t want it. My hope has been that the players’ union would push for the NL DH in the next CBA as a way to increase revenues going to players, as part of a broader financial negotiations. Maybe that won’t happen.
http://www.bleachernation.com/2015/...ignated-hitter-in-next-cba-and-other-bullets/