What is Q's love affair with John Scott?

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
The hell was this clown on the ice in a one goal game?

Is Q this stupid? Skille scratched over him? :obama:
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
skille could have been scratched due to in house reasons that the media doesnt know about. hustle in practice, maybe sore ( but not injury report worthy ) could be getting sick. who knows? i hope there is a reason like that, and it isnt just q loving scott.
 

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
I wonder if Skille's time is running out here. Just my 2 cents.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
yea...Tab Bamford wrote about that this morning.


Skille getting traded? maybe
 

Relapse

Leddy > Cullimore
Joined:
Dec 4, 2010
Posts:
518
Liked Posts:
189
I would be flat out furious if Jack Skille was traded. He has been given garbage ice time most of this season and still creates a ton of scoring chances, mostly on his own. When he was needed to play a larger role, due to injuries, he played great. Skille is one of a handful of players I can honestly say say give full effort every game and shift. I have no fucking clue why the coaching staff is trying to hold him back.

I do not get it, we reached for him in the draft knowing he was a project player. He finally has developed his game that we can start reaping the benefits of sinking a high first round selection on him and now we choose to waste his talent? At a point where we need cheap players to contribute.

I have been behind almost every decision Stan Bowman and Coach Q have made but the Skille situation pisses me off and is so puzzling. His play on the ice does not lie.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
if skille were to get dealt, i would be pretty pissed off.
 

southern_cross_116

New member
Joined:
May 24, 2010
Posts:
1,748
Liked Posts:
1,012
Location:
Australia
I'm going to take this opportunity to point out that a guy speculating on a blog does not an actual trade make.

I don't get what the big deal actually is. I saw the team trade their number 1 center one summer, personally I think I could take them trading a guy who hasn't yet realized his potential. It isn't nearly as big of a deal as made out - not the least bit because it has all been based upon some guy ruminating on a Blog.

Web 2.0- gotta love it ... everyone is an expert :p .
 

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
Positive: John Scott was in the press box where he belongs.

party0049.gif
 

southern_cross_116

New member
Joined:
May 24, 2010
Posts:
1,748
Liked Posts:
1,012
Location:
Australia
... and the team lost anyways.

Which ought to prove, even to you -that bitching about the guy is pointless. The guy isn't an impact player.
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
I readte stat somewere that when John Scott played and has fought, the team only had like 2 losses, I will double check on this stat to be 100% sure
 

Relapse

Leddy > Cullimore
Joined:
Dec 4, 2010
Posts:
518
Liked Posts:
189
I readte stat somewere that when John Scott played and has fought, the team only had like 2 losses, I will double check on this stat to be 100% sure

Please do not bother because you know it is irrelevant and would simply be a coincidence.
 

Captain Iago

Giver of Occular Proof
Donator
Joined:
May 24, 2010
Posts:
5,905
Liked Posts:
1,974
I readte stat somewere that when John Scott played and has fought, the team only had like 2 losses, I will double check on this stat to be 100% sure

Please do not bother because you know it is irrelevant and would simply be a coincidence.

Lots of crap out there; it's wrong. Hawks are 3-4 when Scott actually has an opponent bold enough to drop 'em.
 

Top