- Joined:
- Jul 2, 2011
- Posts:
- 485
- Liked Posts:
- 165
- Location:
- Texas
Just curious. He was had for under 2 mill by a team that can't win with a two goal head start. Surely he'd have signed with us for less.
Yes, he's 36, but he's a consistent 50 point scorer. That'd put him in the top 5 for us. It would also have allowed us to put Sharp back on a wing with Toews and Kane.
We could have gone:
Kane - Toews - Sharp (fierce scoring line)
Brunette - Prospal - Hossa (some size and some scoring)
Bickell - Bolland - Stalberg / Carcillo (checking line I suppose)
Smith - Kruger - Frolik (speed, speed, and a little more speed)
He just wasn't that much money and he has been productive his entire career at center (other than a few injury shortened seasons, and he still produced when not hurt in those years).
He's never been a point a game guy, but he's solid and he distributes the biscuit.
Anybody have any ideas as to why we didn't go after this guy, considering how cheap he was, how injury-prone Bolland is, and how nice it ould be to move Sharp back to wing?
Yes, he's 36, but he's a consistent 50 point scorer. That'd put him in the top 5 for us. It would also have allowed us to put Sharp back on a wing with Toews and Kane.
We could have gone:
Kane - Toews - Sharp (fierce scoring line)
Brunette - Prospal - Hossa (some size and some scoring)
Bickell - Bolland - Stalberg / Carcillo (checking line I suppose)
Smith - Kruger - Frolik (speed, speed, and a little more speed)
He just wasn't that much money and he has been productive his entire career at center (other than a few injury shortened seasons, and he still produced when not hurt in those years).
He's never been a point a game guy, but he's solid and he distributes the biscuit.
Anybody have any ideas as to why we didn't go after this guy, considering how cheap he was, how injury-prone Bolland is, and how nice it ould be to move Sharp back to wing?