Pez68
Fire Waldron
- Joined:
- Oct 31, 2014
- Posts:
- 5,020
- Liked Posts:
- 835
Won't see many worse interceptions than that one. Lol
Won't see many worse interceptions than that one. Lol
Where there is smoke, there is fire?
Daniels and Fautanu both on IR. Does that balance it out?While this is true the Dallas D was missing it's best players. This was a game that the Pitt O should have carried more of the load.
Not completely. Parsons and Lawrence are far more important to the D than Daniels and Fautanu are to Pitts O. You are talking 2 Pro Bowl DL vs a solid OL and a rookie still trying to find his feet. Combined their replacements gave up like 3 pressures.Daniels and Fautanu both on IR. Does that balance it out?
Correction— Parsons is All-Pro. (Just practicing my pedantry degree)Not completely. Parsons and Lawrence are far more important to the D than Daniels and Fautanu are to Pitts O. You are talking 2 Pro Bowl DL vs a solid OL and a rookie still trying to find his feet. Combined their replacements gave up like 3 pressures.
So having 3 starters on IR on oline, no Patterson, and most importantly, no Warren means nothing and Pittsburgh should just march down the field with zero resistance from the poor, talentless Dallas defense?Not completely. Parsons and Lawrence are far more important to the D than Daniels and Fautanu are to Pitts O. You are talking 2 Pro Bowl DL vs a solid OL and a rookie still trying to find his feet. Combined their replacements gave up like 3 pressures.
So having 3 starters on IR on oline, no Patterson, and most importantly, no Warren means nothing and Pittsburgh should just march down the field with zero resistance from the poor, talentless Dallas defense?
Ok, that was a little over the top, but let's just say A) Pittsburgh's offense isn't very good B) they are missing 3 starters on the oline that wasn't very good to start with. Unless you believe Daniels PFF rating. That would definitely make him more important.
Point is both teams weren't at full strength. One of the already had struggles running the ball.
I would say Dallas caught a break.
Got nothing to do with Fields. I didn't say except for Fields. I said the offense was bad, even before the injuries. That should be taken as including Fields but it lets me know your perspective.Except I already pointed out the OL replacements didn't really give up a significant amount of pressure. Like yes in theory it could have been a problem. In reality it wasn't.
They should score more than 17 points. Yall really have a low bar for Fields.
Dallas is significantly worse on D without Parsons and Lawrence. By contrast the Steelers are not significantly worse on offense without Daniels and TF.Got nothing to do with Fields. I didn't say except for Fields. I said the offense was bad, even before the injuries. That should be taken as including Fields but it lets me know your perspective.
Again Dallas is ranked 15th in Defense 13th against the rush. Pittsburgh is 19th in offense. They can't run the ball so that leaves Fields passing.
How does this imply they should play better against Dallas when we both agree they are bad? Dallas without Lawrence and Parsons should be able to stop them right?
I believe Michael Mayer entered rehab from what I’m hearing.Players ruled out for Sunday include Derek Carr, Taysom Hill, Cesar Ruiz, Pete Werner, Kamari Lassiter, Jimmie Ward, Robert Woods, Rhamondre Stevenson, Jonathan Taylor, Jamal Adams, Nick Chubb, Grant Delpit, Ethan Pocic, Devonte Wyatt, Zay Jones, Darius Robinson, Austin Corbett, Josey Jewell, Taylor Moton, Tommy Tremble, Micah Parsons, Eric Kendricks, Josh Reynolds, Gus Edwards, Nick Herbig, Alex Highsmith, Cordarrelle Patterson, Davante Adams, Michael Mayer, Malik Nabers.
What you seem to be missing is that diminished Dallas is still better than a diminished Pittsburgh.Dallas is significantly worse on D without Parsons and Lawrence. By contrast the Steelers are not significantly worse on offense without Daniels and TF.
You ask any NFL coach whether Parsons and Lawrence are bigger losses than Daniels and TF they would say yes.